Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-20 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Louis Lagendijk writes: >> > >> > At openSUSE we use libusb-1 since openSUSE 12.2 >> > (i.e. we use libusb-1 since about April 2012) >> > via "configure --enable-libusb_1_0". >> > I am not aware of issues because of this. >> >

Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-19 Thread Louis Lagendijk
> > > > At openSUSE we use libusb-1 since openSUSE 12.2 > > (i.e. we use libusb-1 since about April 2012) > > via "configure --enable-libusb_1_0". > > I am not aware of issues because of this. > >

Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-19 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Johannes, Johannes Meixner writes: > Hello, > > On Jul 18 22:18 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt): >> I had expected at least some reaction to my announcement[1] >> of the switch to libusb-1.0 as the new default for USB but, >> failing any, I assume that everyone is happy and all is well. >> >>

Re: [sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-19 Thread Johannes Meixner
Hello, On Jul 18 22:18 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (excerpt): I had expected at least some reaction to my announcement[1] of the switch to libusb-1.0 as the new default for USB but, failing any, I assume that everyone is happy and all is well. [1]

[sane-devel] [janitorial] musl builder, PDF SANE Standard, __sane_unused__

2016-07-18 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi all, I had expected at least some reaction to my announcement[1] of the switch to libusb-1.0 as the new default for USB but, failing any, I assume that everyone is happy and all is well. [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2016-July/034654.html Since the switch, I have: