correction
scanimage --batch=preview.jpg --batch-count=1 --format=jpeg -d -x -y -l 0 -t 0
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> Because I will use the default resolution I will leave out that
> argument and I though about if the default scan area
Because I will use the default resolution I will leave out that
argument and I though about if the default scan area for -l and -t
might not always be 0 so maybe I should do this
scanimage --batch=preview.jpg --batch-count=1 --format=jpeg -d --test-picture=Grid -x -y -l 0 -t 0
On Thu, Jan 4,
On 04/01/18 19:14, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> I'm thinking my best bet is to use the default resolution with max x and max
> y.
Exactly. A resolution of 1 is too small. This works fine for me:
scanimage --batch=preview.jpg --batch-count=1 --format=jpeg -d test:1
--resolution=50 --test-picture=Grid
I'm thinking my best bet is to use the default resolution with max x and max y.
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
> I have been working on a php implementation of a scanner interface.
>
> I am making some progress. I have my code at
>
I have been working on a php implementation of a scanner interface.
I am making some progress. I have my code at
https://bitbucket.org/jeffsadowski/phpsaneng
(Not anywhere ready for mainstream as for now it just lists the
options selected when I hit scan.)
I'm at the point where I want to start