Hi!
Scanner protocol of Canon LiDE 600F is very high level. With a
structural analysis it is possible to see functional blocks of driver
code. With my knowledge till now I should be able to program a perl
script in a couple of days to do a first low resolution scan.
Can somebody confirm that
On Friday 18 January 2008 02:41:05 m. allan noah wrote:
I know nothing about the GL841, but the HP G4010 might be one (or so
check-usb-chip thinks).
we now have a user-provided usbsnoop attached to this bug report:
m. allan noah schrieb:
I know nothing about the GL841, but the HP G4010 might be one (or so
check-usb-chip thinks).
we now have a user-provided usbsnoop attached to this bug report:
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=410366aid=305050group_id=30186
Could someone who has seen
J?rgen Ernst schrieb:
Hi!
Scanner protocol of Canon LiDE 600F is very high level. With a
structural analysis it is possible to see functional blocks of driver
code. With my knowledge till now I should be able to program a perl
script in a couple of days to do a first low resolution scan.
In message 4790954F.9000204 at pirsoft.dnsalias.org, Pierre Willenbrock
pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org writes
m. allan noah schrieb:
I know nothing about the GL841, but the HP G4010 might be one (or so
check-usb-chip thinks).
we now have a user-provided usbsnoop attached to this bug report:
Pierre Willenbrock schrieb:
The LiDE 70 is a gl841 based scanner, and those are dumb scanners with
very few firmware.
I am wondering. According to
http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-lide-70.html I found that
the output of sane-find-scanner didn't identify this scanner as GL841
J?rgen Ernst schrieb:
Pierre Willenbrock schrieb:
The LiDE 70 is a gl841 based scanner, and those are dumb scanners with
very few firmware.
I am wondering. According to
http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-lide-70.html I found that
the output of sane-find-scanner didn't identify
