Le Monday 19 May 2008 23:33:08 Werner Holtfreter, vous avez ?crit?:
Am Montag, 19. Mai 2008 21:04:22 schrieb stef:
???could you try to run scanimage with debug logs enabled with the
following commands in a shell:
export SANE_DEBUG_GENESYS=255
export SANE_DEBUG_GENESYS_GL646=255
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:20:04 +0100, Chris Lale wrote:
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:01:08 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
well, i've just committed a patch to fix this, but please test, as i
never saw the error message in the first place...
Does anyone have a good procedure for
Hi,
I've recently upgraded to Ubuntu 8.04 and I discovered that I can't scan
in gray scale with my HP5470c.
The scan mode menu is not available in xsane (0.995), xscanimage
(1.0.14) or kooka (0.44).
From what I recalled, it used to be possible with Ubuntu 7.10. It
surely works fine under
Hello,
I'm trying to make canon lide 90 working under sane. But since weeks I don't
make progress.
I need some documentation/informations about cis clocking scheme.
For example, what are CCD TG, VSMP, BSMP, CCD RS, CCD CP, clock 1 3 and 4...
mentionned in Genesys GL842 datasheet ?
Thank you
there have been no recent changes to the hp5400 backend. can you
please verify that the grayscale option did appear in prior versions
of sane?
allan
2008/5/21 Guillaume guillcdv at gmail.com:
Hi,
I've recently upgraded to Ubuntu 8.04 and I discovered that I can't scan
in gray scale with my
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080521/487b9da5/attachment.htm
ok guys- take 3:
Six general points for sane 1.1.x:
- no changes to function calls
- no changes to structures
- 1.0 backends forward compatible with 1.1
- improve backend consistency
- support more advanced scanners
- improve cooperation with modern system services
Specific proposals:
1.
Maybe worth a try with Genius gt68xx backend ? (seems to work good for
vivid 1200X and XE).
Add your scanner USB IDs to the /etc/sane.d/gt68xx.conf file (at the
bottom) and recheck whether it gets detected with a scanimage -L and
scanimage -T
You can get your scanner USB IDs by issuing a:
To be exact, the message was: Failed to open device
'niash:libusb:002:006': Device Busy'. Now my scanner is an Agfa
Scanwise/Snapscan and I think the model is 1212u.
Any insight is appreciated.
--
--
-
Bobby Yu's Contact Information
Yahoo Address (Personal): bobbyyu1 at yahoo.ca
MSN Address
Hi,
From my point of view, everything is fine.
Regards,
?tienne.
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080522/a2bb323f/attachment.htm
The HP ScanJet 8250 scanner works great with VueScan, but doesn't work
with the SANE backend. I am on OS X 10.5.2. I saw that the avision
backend should be used, but so far, it doesn't seem to get past this
issue:
SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=1 scanimage test.pnm
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:59 -0700, yefer barandica wrote:
Thanks Nicolas for your help. I did what you told me but nothing
happens. It seems my scanner is based on a SQ113 chip technology and
not on a GT68 chip technology. I was reading a page where says that
if I want to use the SANE gt68xx
Dear listmembers,
having two scanners attached to my system I get calling scanimage -L
SCANNER1
SCANNER2
choosing the appropriate command sequence with scanimage -f I can get the very
same result, except it looks like
SCANNER1SCANNER2
is there any hidden way to force scanimage -f commandset to
Sorry, I deleted the message which mentions this, by mistake. But just in
case it would help, I have supported several camera chips from SQ. In case
that anyone intends to pursue the business of scanners running the
SQ113(is this the right number, I forget?), it is obviously possible that
Hi all,
A while back I got an Epson Perfection 4490 Photo and found out that the
16-bit scanning didn't work, so I made a patch for the epkowa driver to
fix the problem. I posted it on the avasys message board, but evidently
didn't do enough research to find out that I could've posted it here.
Now
I want to ask if anyone can tell me if there is any hope to have
support in sane for this model of scanner. Thanks in advance.
On 23.05.2008 20:45, Dieter Jurzitza wrote:
Dear listmembers,
having two scanners attached to my system I get calling scanimage -L
SCANNER1
SCANNER2
choosing the appropriate command sequence with scanimage -f I can get the
very
same result, except it looks like
SCANNER1SCANNER2
is
I am looking to see if functionality has been added to utilize the scan
button on an ADF scanner? I have read a few posts back in '04 in the
archives, and am wondering if any progress has been made.
Thanks,
Ron
Dear Abel, dear Listmembers,
thanks very much, this did the trick! I would never have thought about doing
it this way, though ;-)
Take care
Dieter Jurzitza
--
---
|
\
m. allan noah a ?crit :
why did you pick sane 1.0.12, is that the version that was on your last os?
I just picked the not too old one which would compile on my system to
see if it would make any difference.
After some web searching here is the ubuntu 7.10 version
it could be done in the backend, but it would be easier to use an
external program to do it, something from the netpbm package will do
it...
allan
On 5/25/08, Guillaume guillcdv at gmail.com wrote:
m. allan noah a ?crit :
why did you pick sane 1.0.12, is that the version that was on your
it would seem that a better long-term choice would be to correct
scanimage to output a \n after each scanner?
allan
On 5/25/08, Dieter Jurzitza dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de wrote:
Dear Abel, dear Listmembers,
thanks very much, this did the trick! I would never have thought about doing
it
On 5/24/08, Ron Joffe ron.joffe at gmail.com wrote:
I am looking to see if functionality has been added to utilize the scan
button on an ADF scanner? I have read a few posts back in '04 in the
archives, and am wondering if any progress has been made.
the fujitsu backend has supported all
there has been much work on this by Guillaume Gastebois and Pierre. it
sounds like the backend is not working well enough for general use
yet, but things are looking up?
allan
On 5/24/08, silvius chis silvanus2005 at gmail.com wrote:
I want to ask if anyone can tell me if there is any hope to
El Wednesday 21 May 2008 20:50:46 m. allan noah escribi?:
5. Several new well-known options for buttons and sensors. Backends
should use the closest one to the meaning of the label on the scanner
or the button's use in the manufacturer's software. Backends may also
use a different name if no
or perhaps scan2 or altscan?
allan
On 5/25/08, JKD jkdsoft at gmail.com wrote:
El Wednesday 21 May 2008 20:50:46 m. allan noah escribi?:
5. Several new well-known options for buttons and sensors. Backends
should use the closest one to the meaning of the label on the scanner
or the
Hi,
or perhaps scan2 or altscan?
No ! you need to keep to semantic ! altscan or scan is not
selfexplanatory. Please prefer film or scan-film.
We should also state whether we should use _ or - in option name. I
guess that the standard is lowercase + hyphen + digit.
?tienne.
Hi,
some scanners even have simplex / duplex buttons or even fine grained
to up/down arrows to setup resolution, color mode etc. (i.g. the
popular HP 7400).
In the Avision backend I know use a string option to spit out
a message the program can parse.
Going with the current trend, maybe a xml
Dear David,
I do not have a device for testing.
The SANE CVS might or might not work better. If it does not work
better on your device you could donate a device for testing and
it should be fixable quickly.
Alternative, if you know C, you could try and debug the problem.
Yours,
--
Ren?
Hi Allan,
can you explain the paper width option to me? Why can we
not simply use br x/y?
Actually I got a Fujitsu scanner here and find the duplicate
paper width option annoying at best.
Aside the already mentioned button to use some more extend-able
XML encoding instead of a hardcoded set, I
On 5/26/08, ?tienne Bersac bersace03 at gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
or perhaps scan2 or altscan?
No ! you need to keep to semantic ! altscan or scan is not
selfexplanatory. Please prefer film or scan-film.
i doubt any frontend is going to code distinct support for such a
unique button, but we
On 5/26/08, Ren? Rebe rene at exactcode.de wrote:
Hi,
some scanners even have simplex / duplex buttons or even fine grained
to up/down arrows to setup resolution, color mode etc. (i.g. the
popular HP 7400).
right- but what is the frontend going to do with that, read the user's
setting,
sorry rene- this should have gone to list...
On 5/26/08, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
On 5/26/08, Ren? Rebe rene at exactcode.de wrote:
Hi Allan,
can you explain the paper width option to me? Why can we
not simply use br x/y?
Actually I got a Fujitsu scanner
Hi,
but what is the frontend going to do with that, read the user's
setting, then turn the data back around and set the resolution and
duplex options? it seems that would be better done in the backend
itself.?
But the frontend should be aware that the device has changed some value,
at least
On 5/26/08, ?tienne Bersac bersace03 at gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
but what is the frontend going to do with that, read the user's
setting, then turn the data back around and set the resolution and
duplex options? it seems that would be better done in the backend
itself.?
But the
Hi,
ps: this time to the list as well :-)
m. allan noah wrote:
On 5/26/08, Ren? Rebe rene at exactcode.de wrote:
Hi Allan,
can you explain the paper width option to me? Why can we
not simply use br x/y?
Actually I got a Fujitsu scanner here and find the duplicate
paper width option
On 5/26/08, Ren? Rebe rene at exactcode.de wrote:
Hi,
ps: this time to the list as well :-)
m. allan noah wrote:
On 5/26/08, Ren? Rebe rene at exactcode.de wrote:
Hi Allan,
can you explain the paper width option to me? Why can we
not simply use br x/y?
Actually I
Hello,
I have started to change sane-frontends to handle new status code
from SANE
1.1 . But before any commit, I suppose one should tag current
sources.
new status code ?
Hmm where should I snoop to know what to change ?
I might have to update Sanity later...
Or maybe
Hello,
I have started to change sane-frontends to handle new status
code
from SANE
1.1 . But before any commit, I suppose one should tag current
sources.
new status code ?
Hmm where should I snoop to know what to change ?
I might have to update Sanity later...
Hello,
I work on, but don't know when It'll be good working.
I want to ask if anyone can tell me if there is any hope to have
support in sane for this model of scanner. Thanks in advance.
Sam V. posted recently a bug report with a 64 bits kernel, running the
pixma backend and a MF-4270 Canon MFP.
Details here:
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?group_id=30186atid=410366func=detailaid=310861
He has the pixma backend running fine with a 32 bits kernel (same
version as 64 bits) in
two random thoughts-
1. can he try 32 bit kernel on same exact machine, just to rule out
hardware problems?
2. is there a pattern to the timeouts, like always same number of
errors before a good packet?
allan
On 5/26/08, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote:
Sam V. posted recently a
Hello,
On May 25 07:48 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
it would seem that a better long-term choice would be to correct
scanimage to output a \n after each scanner?
And how can I then get the output in one single line?
(without using tr -d '\n' ;-)
It would break backward compatibility.
According to the SANE website, the Canon CanoScan 8400F is currently
unsupported but GL841 based, to be added to genesys backend. I would
GREATLY appreciate this scanner being supported in Linux (specifically
Ubuntu Hardy). Does anyone know when this might happen?
Although it appears that all
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote:
Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
two random thoughts-
1. can he try 32 bit kernel on same exact machine, just to rule out
hardware problems?
Good point, and to try other USB ports on the
Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr
wrote:
Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
two random thoughts-
1. can he try 32 bit kernel on same exact machine, just to rule out
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote:
Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr
wrote:
Le lundi 26 mai 2008 ? 19:12 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
two random
Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 16:24 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr
wrote:
Le mardi 27 mai 2008 ? 15:42 -0400, m. allan noah a ?crit :
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Nicolas nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr
wrote:
Le
On 5/27/08, Dieter Jurzitza dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de wrote:
Dear listmembers,
I did not see the previous posting from M. Allan Noah, but in general I
totally agree with Johannes Meixner: if one introduces such an option (what I
would consider positive) the backward compatibility
Hello
On 5/27/08, Dieter Jurzitza dieter.jurzitza at t-online.de wrote:
...
... parsing individual scanners from the scanimage -f output.
FYI:
For the current scanimage -f output use something like
scanimage -f '%d;' | tr ';' '\n'
Kind Regards
Johannes Meixner
--
SUSE LINUX Products
Hello,
my new fi-5220C is connected with its scsi interface to my OpenSuse 10.3
system. I am using sane-backends 1.0.19 and xsane 0.995 for scanning.
By scanning with the adf I can get a prescan. After switching to flatbed
source the prescan standard picture of xsane becomes smaller. Clicking
sorry dirk- should have sent this to the list as well...
On 5/28/08, m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
On 5/28/08, Dirk Meier dirk.meier at gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
my new fi-5220C is connected with its scsi interface to my OpenSuse 10.3
system. I am using sane-backends 1.0.19
I'm attempting to scan a two-page document with PDF output. The 'sane'
working directory is created and three files are created therein - the two PNG
image files and 'xsane-multipage-list'.
However clicking on the save multipage file button pops up the message
window File
(15:02:26) kennethr: I'm getting segmentation fault core dump when
attempting to use an HPscanjet5300C with scanimage (sane-backends)
1.0.19; backend version 1.0.19 on Ubuntu 8.04(Hardy Heron). What can
I do to get this issue resolved?
(15:02:31) kennethr: sort_and_average
first thing i would try is building sane from a cvs checkout, and see
if the recent avision updates fix the problem.
allan
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Kenneth Redler kennyredler at gmail.com
wrote:
(15:02:26) kennethr: I'm getting segmentation fault core dump when
attempting to use an
Yes, they do fix this.
Sorry, somehow I wiped some lines of code with some previous code merge,
introducing this regression ...
CVS is fine.
Yours,
m. allan noah wrote:
first thing i would try is building sane from a cvs checkout, and see
if the recent avision updates fix the problem.
Hello all,
Please be patient with a novice here: I'm trying to use twain-sane in
order to use the SANE interface with the scanner on a HP Photosmart
C4280. This is running on Mac OS X 10.5.2. Following the FAQ at
http://www.ellert.se/twain-sane/faq.html , I've managed to find the
scanner
Greg Wyatt wrote:
According to the SANE website, the Canon CanoScan 8400F is currently
unsupported but GL841 based, to be added to genesys backend. I
would GREATLY appreciate this scanner being supported in Linux
(specifically Ubuntu Hardy). Does anyone know when this might happen?
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20080530/499719c1/attachment.htm
example, if we buy some modules from other company without source code, =
how to deal with it? Would you please give me some suggestion for =
commerce development like this?
I agree to your opinion that we should not violate the spirit of =
freedom through the middle-ware layer. Our idea is to
On 4/30/08, Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hello,
On Apr 30 11:35 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (shortened):
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de writes:
On Apr 24 16:35 Olaf Meeuwissen wrote (shortened):
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de writes:
Because of legal issues
nothing i can find about the hp4200 backend indicates that it supports
your machine. i think you need to see if the hpaio backend supports
this scanner, and if so, if that backend is available for your OS. it
comes not from sane, but from: hplip.sourceforge.net, IIRC.
allan
On 5/30/08, Coe,
Thanks for the input. It looks like it is not supported on Mac OS X
10.5 at the moment, from all that I can gather.
-Original Message-
From: m. allan noah [mailto:kitno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 7:08 AM
To: Coe, Kenneth
Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
In the past few weeks, I have made several updates to the fujitsu sane
backend. I don't really have a good list of testers, so I am putting
out a call for all fujitsu backend users to please try the current
version from SANE CVS. We are working toward a SANE 1.1.0 release this
summer, and I really
Hello all,
I'm trying to use a ColorPage SF600 in a mac Leopard box by the sane
distribution found in http://www.ellert.se/twain-sane/. All goes right until
I try to scan a image. The software just freezes. Running with the
SANE_DEBUG_GT68XX=255 I realized that the drives is looping always
Did you give a try to those backends ?
Maybe to be added into
sane-backends/doc/descriptions-external/hp2400.desc and hp8300.desc ?
Nicolas
Le vendredi 30 mai 2008 ? 19:45 +0200, Olivier DROUET a ?crit :
http://www.elcot.in/linuxdrivers_download.php
--
olivier.drouet at tele2.fr
Hello,
I have commit a fix for the offset of scan area in latest SANE's CVS. I
not
sure this would correct the problem you had a low black and white resolution
scans. If there is still some problem, could you send me the debug log
produced by running theses commands in a
Hallo stef,
am Dienstag, 2008-06-03 06:46 schrieben Sie:
I have commit a fix for the offset of scan area in latest
SANE's CVS.
Thank you very much!
I not sure this would correct the problem you had a low
black and white resolution scans. If there is still some problem,
could you send me
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has had any luck getting the PENTAX DSmobile
600 scanner to work in SANE/on Linux? I would very much like to purchase
it, but there is no point in that if it doesn't work on my system...
--
Regards,
Kjell Andr? Lende
Le Tuesday 03 June 2008 14:18:05 Werner Holtfreter, vous avez ?crit?:
Hallo stef,
am Dienstag, 2008-06-03 06:46 schrieben Sie:
I have commit a fix for the offset of scan area in latest
SANE's CVS.
Thank you very much!
I not sure this would correct the problem you had a low
black and
found this in the mailing list archives:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2007-July/019594.html
allan
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Kjell Andr? Lende post at mypanorama.org
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has had any luck getting the PENTAX DSmobile
600 scanner
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:18 +0200, Kjell Andr? Lende wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:24:31 +0200
Thierry de Coulon tcoulon at decoulon.ch wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Kjell Andr? Lende wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has had any luck getting the PENTAX
DSmobile 600 scanner
Am Dienstag, 3. Juni 2008 20:12:29 schrieb stef:
I not sure this would correct the problem you had a low
black and white resolution scans. If there is still some
problem, could you send me the debug log produced by running
theses commands in a shell:
export
Le Wednesday 04 June 2008 20:17:07 Werner Holtfreter, vous avez ?crit?:
Am Dienstag, 3. Juni 2008 20:12:29 schrieb stef:
I not sure this would correct the problem you had a low
black and white resolution scans. If there is still some
problem, could you send me the debug log produced
Hello,
to maintain the curent 1.0.x version of sane-backends I propose to tag
current sources with:
DEVEL_1_0_TRUNK
Then make a branch:
DEVEL_1_0_BRANCH
SANE 1.1 developments will use MAIN.
Is it OK ? I have modified sane-frontends to compile
Hello, everyone,
My name is Wang mengqiang, I am expecting to get your help on development very
much.
I am investigating to develop a commerce driver on linux. I have studied the
sane project for some time. And, we are planning to develop the driver on sane.
But, I have some doubts on
I have a Visioneer 6200USB and am interested in trying to write a backend
for it, or at least providing as much information about the model as
possible.
I've taken the scanner apart to look at chip information, however I don't
know which of the chips are important to know about. The board that
Thank you for your reply and truth.
Hello,
On Jun 4 21:02 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
SANE is GPL, with an added exception to allow proprietary front-end
programs to link against it. What you are suggesting is the opposite-
you wish to have a free 'middleware' layer, which loads closed
backends to do that actual work? I
2008/6/5 Kyle Dickerson kyle.dickerson at gmail.com:
I have a Visioneer 6200USB and am interested in trying to write a backend
for it, or at least providing as much information about the model as
possible.
I don't have this scanner, but you may want to try the source code
from this link:
Hello,
On 5 Jun 08 08:28, Wang Mengqiang wrote:
1) In the development, we plan to use several special modules which do not
contain any open source code from sane or other party, because they contain
some tecnology that we do not want to open.
May I ask what functionality is contained in
Hello,
On Jun 5 15:55 Daniel Gl?ckner wrote (shortened):
It may sound naive, but usually a scanner driver just needs to write some
registers and accept the incoming image data.
I don't see what needs to be hidden in that process.
...
Maybe it is possible to make your driver compile with a
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hello,
On Jun 4 21:02 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
SANE is GPL, with an added exception to allow proprietary front-end
programs to link against it. What you are suggesting is the opposite-
you wish to have a free
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:02:08 +0800
Wang Mengqiang WangMengqiang at canon-ib.com.cn wrote:
Thank you for your reply and truth.
From your reply, it seems there is no way to use other modules, for example,
if we buy some modules from other company without source code, how to deal
with it?
Looking through the information on the viceo.orconhosting.net site, it shows
my scanner as being unsupported due to using the E5 chipset.
I did find some more information by digging through the files included with
the Windows Driver. One of the files (Hardware.ini) looks like it contains
Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de writes:
I have another question:
Assume because of whatever reason a scanner manufacturer
cannot make a free backend (e.g. because of third-party
license stuff, or just because the upper management at the
manufacturer is full of fear that another
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Johannes Meixner jsmeix at suse.de wrote:
Hello,
On Jun 4 21:02 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
SANE is GPL, with an added exception to allow proprietary front-end
programs to link against it. What you are
Wang Mengqiang,
I am not one of the regular SANE developers, but I am quite active in
another, similar project, Gphoto, which supports digital still cameras. I
find this thread interesting because it raises issues which affect us all.
I hope very much that the SANE developers will not mind if
Le Thursday 05 June 2008 14:00:22 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit?:
On 6/4/08, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Hello,
to maintain the curent 1.0.x version of sane-backends I propose
to tag current sources with:
DEVEL_1_0_TRUNK
i just made this tag.
Then make
Hello,
On Jun 5 11:30 m. allan noah wrote (shortened):
Sane is not here to provide sanei for proprietary backends to steal.
Many thanks!
Now it is clear for me!
Kind Regards
Johannes Meixner
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
AG Nuernberg, HRB 16746, GF:
Theodore Kilgore,
Thank you for your ardent reply.
I feel your earnest expectation to improve the communication with hardware
manufacture. But, very sorry, I am afraid I have no ability to take this
responsibility.
Thank you sharing the possible reasons on the block of communication.
Hello,
On 5 Jun Wang Mengqiang wrote (shortened):
we plan to use several special modules which do not contain
any open source code from sane or other party, because they
contain some tecnology that we do not want to open.
So, that is, our backend is composed of two parts,
one part is open
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:24:25 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
If GPL'd code uses a non-compatible library via dlopen that's just as
much a violation as linking to it directly. The code runs in the same
process space. That makes the combined work a derivative, so,
On 6/6/08, Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:24:25 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
If GPL'd code uses a non-compatible library via dlopen that's just as
much a violation as linking to it directly. The code runs in the
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:54:13 -0400
m. allan noah kitno455 at gm
gpl faq is pretty clear on this one:
If the modules are included in the same executable file, they are
definitely combined in one program. If modules are designed to run
linked together in a shared address space, that almost
On 6/6/08, Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:54:13 -0400
m. allan noah kitno455 at gm
gpl faq is pretty clear on this one:
If the modules are included in the same executable file, they are
definitely combined in one program. If modules are
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Wang Mengqiang wrote:
Theodore Kilgore,
Thank you for your ardent reply.
I feel your earnest expectation to improve the communication with hardware
manufacture. But, very sorry, I am afraid I have no ability to take this
responsibility.
Thank you sharing the
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:26:04 -0400
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
no, the GPL is all about derivative works and combining code, it makes
no difference the direction:
You are probably right, the closest entry in the faq that describes this
situation
seems to be
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:36:39 +0200
Alessandro Zummo azummo-lists at towertech.it wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:26:04 -0400
m. allan noah kitno455 at gmail.com wrote:
no, the GPL is all about derivative works and combining code, it makes
no difference the direction:
You are probably
401 - 500 of 30682 matches
Mail list logo
