Hi Jack,
Jack McGill schrieb:
To list and Pierre,
I recently received a Visioneer XP100, rev 3, usb vid x04a7 pid
0x049b, which has a GL842 chip inside. The model number on the
bottom of the scanner is 85-0110-200. This scanner works very well
using the Visioneer Roadwarrior settings. I
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Jack McGill jmcgill85258 at yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Kelly,
I have added your scanner to my database of small single-page sheetfed
scanners at http://sites.google.com/site/roadwarriorscanner/. It sounds like
your scanner is similar to the Plustek OpticSlim M12
To list and Pierre,
I recently received a Visioneer XP100, rev 3, usb vid x04a7 pid0x049b, which
has a GL842 chip inside. The model number on the bottom of the scanner is
85-0110-200. This scanner works very well using the Visioneer Roadwarrior
settings. I think they are identical twins ;-).
.
Jack McGill
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Jack McGill jmcgill85258 at yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jack McGill jmcgill85258 at yahoo.com
Subject: [sane-devel] Genesys sheetfed scanner update
To: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 5:22 PM
To list and Pierre,
I recently
I'm wondering about my NeatReceipts Portable sheetfed scanner, USB
idVendor 07b3, idProduct 0462. Scans from XSane are comming in too
light and off contrast with the stock XSane 0.996. I use the
following site to get it recognized:
http://foss.bourgassociates.com
Anyone have any ideas?
On
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Genesys sheetfed scanner update
To: Pierre Willenbrock pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org
Cc: jmcgill85258 at yahoo.com, sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 6:37 PM
I'm wondering about my NeatReceipts Portable sheetfed
scanner, USB
/ file
named 8bit_150dpi2.pdf.
Can you reproduce these bugs on your end with the Roadwarrior?
Jack McGill
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Pierre Willenbrock pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org wrote:
From: Pierre Willenbrock pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Genesys sheetfed scanner
