Hi Clint,
Basically, that's about it, except by removing the separate "Terms of Use"
and collapsing that concept into "Subscriber Agreement" there are places
where "agreeing" and "legally binding" may get watered down. "Agree" is
replaced with "accept" in some places, and in two places "legally
Hi Ben,
As I understand it the goal of these changes is just to simplify the terms used
in the BRs — and, as has been brought up separately, potentially other CA/BF
Final Guidelines — in order to enable collapsing their use of “Terms of Use”
into the concept of the “Subscriber Agreement”. Is
I agree with Bruce, and I think we might also want to synchronize the effective
dates. Many customers have a variety of kinds of certificates included in the
same contract, and having two different sets of terminology for the same legal
document involved in the same contract would be really
