Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] Re: Discussion Period Begins - Ballot SC-071: Subscriber Agreement and Terms of Use Consolidation

All, I am currently looking at this version in Gitub: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/blob/SC-71/docs/BR.md. But I'm a little confused on whether some of the recently suggested changes have been merged into that version. I'll defer to Dustin on whether Bruce's first suggestion for

Re: [Servercert-wg] [External Sender] Question regarding the id-ad-caIssuers accessMethod URI

Hi Dimitris, My understanding is that the intent was indeed to restrict these to HTTP specifically. That is, the phrase “the only URLS present MUST be HTTP URLs” is intended to preclude the use of HTTPS, and not just to indicate that any scheme which relies on the Hypertext Transfer Protocol

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] Re: Discussion Period Begins - Ballot SC-071: Subscriber Agreement and Terms of Use Consolidation

Hi Ben, We have some feedback from our legal team. First suggestion is to simplify the change to only address the objectives of the ballot: 5. Subscriber Agreement: That, if the CA and Subscriber are not Affiliated, the Subscriber and CA are parties to a legally valid and enforceable

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

TrustAsia votes YES on Ballot SC-073. Best regards, Rollin Yu > On Apr 26, 2024, at 08:00, Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg > wrote: > > Purpose of Ballot SC-073 > This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance > and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

GlobalSign votes yes on Ballot SC-073. Doug From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 8:00 PM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Let's Encrypt / ISRG votes Yes on SC-073. On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:00 PM Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg < servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: > Purpose of Ballot SC-073 > > This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance > and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Sectigo votes yes De: Servercert-wg En nombre de Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg Enviado el: viernes, 26 de abril de 2024 2:00 Para: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Asunto: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys CAUTION:

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC-073. Bruce. From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 8:00 PM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073:

Re: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Telia Company votes ‘Yes’ on Ballot SC-073 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg Date: Friday, 26. April 2024 at 3.00 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised

Re: [Servercert-wg] [External Sender] Voting Period Begins - Ballot SC-073: Compromised and Weak Keys

Actalis votes 'yes' Il 26/04/2024 02:00, Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg ha scritto: NOTICE: Pay attention - external email - Sender is 0100018f17b415ae-778c107a-354f-4239-9c91-1848b0fd4f07-000...@amazonses.com Purpose of Ballot SC-073 This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline