Buypass votes NO on ballot SC-74.
Regards
Mads
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Mads Egil
Henriksveen via Servercert-wg
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 4:50 PM
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) ; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting
IZENPE votes NO on Ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:
"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all
TWCA changes its vote to “no” on ballot SC-74
Hao-Chun Li
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of
蔡家宏(chtsai) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 4:21 PM
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) ; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting
Chunghwa Telecom votes "No" to ballot SC-74.
Li-Chun Chen
-Original Message-
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 12:06 AM
To: servercert-wg@cabforum.org
Subject: [外部郵件]Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins]
SECOM Trust Systems changes its vote to NO on Ballot SC-74.
Best Regards,
ONO, Fumiaki
SECOM Trust Systems Co., Ltd.
From: 大野 文彰
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2024 6:48 PM
To: 'Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA)' ; 'CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [Servercert-wg]
GoDaddy votes "No" on SC-74 based on the discussion from the Server Certificate
working group call on May 9. 2024.
Brittany
From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 1:24 AM
To: CA/B Forum
Telia changes its vote to ’no’ on Ballot SC-74
//Antti
Lähettäjä: Servercert-wg käyttäjän
Backman, Antti via Servercert-wg puolesta
Lähetetty: tiistaina, toukokuuta 7, 2024 8:31 ip.
Vastaanottaja: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) ; CA/B Forum
Server
OISTE changes its vote to No, given the latest developments Le 9 mai 2024 à 18:05, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg a écrit :
Based on comments received during -unfortunately- the voting period,
it appears that more attention to detail like the case of the
Mozilla changes its vote to "no" on Ballot SC-74 with the understanding
that additional edits are needed.
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 1:05 PM Ben Wilson wrote:
> Mozilla votes "yes" on Ballot SC-74.
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 3:06 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
> Servercert-wg wrote:
>
>>
IdenTrust also changes our vote to “No” on Ballot SC-74 as the feedback from
others make sense that this ballot requires further finetuning.
Marco S.
TrustID Program Manager
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Marco
Schambach via Servercert-wg
Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 10:05 AM
To:
Subject: Final minutes of the SCWG call of April 25th
These are the Final Minutes of the Teleconference described in the subject
of this message, prepared by Ryan Dickson (Google Chrome).
Server Certificate Working Group Agenda 25 April 2024
Attendees: Aaron Poulsen (Amazon
HARICA votes "no" to ballot SC-74.
Dimitris.
On 5/5/2024 12:06 μ.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote:
HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC-74.
On 5/5/2024 11:24 π.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
Servercert-wg wrote:
Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS
Based on comments received during -unfortunately- the voting period, it
appears that more attention to detail like the case of the section
headings, punctuation marks, etc need to be carefully reviewed before
approving with this ballot.
I would like to recommend Members to change their vote
TrustAsia votes NO on Ballot SC-74.
Best regards,
Rollin Yu
> On May 5, 2024, at 16:24, Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
> wrote:
>
> Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
> SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
>
> Summary
>
> The TLS Baseline Requirements
VikingCloud votes No on SC74.
Regards,
Andrea Holland
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4:25 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 -
eMudhra changes our vote to NO on Ballot SC-74
This is motivated by additional observations enumerated by DigiCert that this
needs a little more work…
Regards,
_Scott
From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Date: Sunday, 5 May 2024 at 2:24 AM
To:
At the request of the authors, Let's Encrypt changes our vote on Ballot
SC-74 to No so that the ballot can be modified and resubmitted.
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 3:21 PM Aaron Gable via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:
> Let's Encrypt / ISRG votes Yes on Ballot SC-074.
>
> On Sun,
Amazon Trust Services votes no based on the discussion in the Server Cert group
call where it was determined we want to make an additional revision to this
ballot.
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 1:24 AM
To: CA/B
Entrust votes No to ballot SC-74.
Bruce.
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Bruce
Morton via Servercert-wg
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 8:24 AM
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) ; CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] [Voting Begins]
GlobalSign changes our vote to NO on Ballot SC-74.
We agree with DigiCert’s observations that this needs a little more work:
The ballot is insufficiently clear about whether punctuation, capitalization,
etc have to match exactly, and RFC 3647, which is Informative and was never
intended to
DigiCert votes NO on Ballot SC-74.
The ballot is insufficiently clear about whether punctuation, capitalization,
etc have to match exactly, and RFC 3647, which is Informative and was never
intended to be used this way, is inconsistent itself in its use of
capitalization and punctuation.
OK - then I have a question for all those voting on SC74 (as an Associate
member rep, I do not have a vote)
How do you interpret the proposed new language:
include at least every section and subsection defined in section 6 of RFC
3647
Does this mean:
a) that the section and subsection headers
Buypass votes YES on ballot SC-74.
Regards
Mads
From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Dimitris
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 10:25 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify
I think that is a question to be taken up with the authors of SC-74, and
with the root programs. In the interest of caution, I think this linting
tool should err on the side of strictness. It is open source, however, so
you are of course free to modify it for your own preferences.
Aaron
On Thu,
Aaron -
Can I suggest that maybe the comparison should be done in a case blind
fashion?
For example, requiring the headers for the subsections of 1.3 to have the
second word lower case when it is common practice to refer to Certification
Authorities as CAs and Registration Authorities as RAs, etc.
SECOM Trust Systems votes YES on Ballot SC-74.
Best Regards,
ONO, Fumiaki
SECOM Trust Systems Co., Ltd.
From: Servercert-wg [mailto:servercert-wg-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of
Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 5:25 PM
To: CA/B Forum Server
26 matches
Mail list logo
