Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

o:servercert-wg@cabforum.org> > Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 Hi Wendy, I would definitely go for c) because the documents are overall not standardized enough to do any kind of automatic parsing where a) or b) would ma

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

riday, May 10, 2024 4:20 AM > To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List > mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org>> > Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure > according to RFC 3647 > > Hi Wendy, > > I would definitely go f

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

*Subject:* Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 Hi Wendy, I would definitely go for c) because the documents are overall not standardized enough to do any kind of automatic parsing where a) or b) would maybe help. Rgds Roman *From:*Servercer

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

On Behalf Of Roman Fischer via Servercert-wg Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 4:20 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 Hi Wendy, I would definitely go for c) because the documents

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

To: Aaron Gable Cc: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 OK - then I have a question for all those voting on SC74 (as an Associate member rep, I do not have a vote) How do you interpret

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

OK - then I have a question for all those voting on SC74 (as an Associate member rep, I do not have a vote) How do you interpret the proposed new language: include at least every section and subsection defined in section 6 of RFC 3647 Does this mean: a) that the section and subsection headers

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

I think that is a question to be taken up with the authors of SC-74, and with the root programs. In the interest of caution, I think this linting tool should err on the side of strictness. It is open source, however, so you are of course free to modify it for your own preferences. Aaron On Thu,

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Aaron - Can I suggest that maybe the comparison should be done in a case blind fashion? For example, requiring the headers for the subsections of 1.3 to have the second word lower case when it is common practice to refer to Certification Authorities as CAs and Registration Authorities as RAs, etc.

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Of course! Done: https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/issues/513 On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:37 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) < dzach...@harica.gr> wrote: > Thanks Aaron, > > Would it be ok for you to create a GitHub issue > to identify the

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Thanks Aaron, Would it be ok for you to create a GitHub issue to identify the specific sections that deviate in content? We might tackle that in a cleanup ballot. I don't think the capitalization is so much of a concern but if others think it

Re: [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Two notes on this ballot, findings from our process for handling upcoming requirements: 1) Let's Encrypt has created and open-sourced a tool for linting a CPS to confirm compliance with RFC 3647 Section 6 and Ballot SC-074. If you

[Servercert-wg] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 Summary The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that: /"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required by RFC