gt;
>
> *From: *Servercert-wg on behalf of
> Chris Clements via Servercert-wg
> *Date: *Wednesday, 20 March 2024 at 21:20
> *To: *Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) , CA/B Forum
> Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
> *Subject: *Re: [Servercert-wg] Discussion Period Begins - Ballot
cert-wg on behalf of Chris
Clements via Servercert-wg
Date: Wednesday, 20 March 2024 at 21:20
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) , CA/B Forum Server
Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Servercert-wg] Discussion Period Begins - Ballot SC-067 V1:
"Require domain va
>
>
>
>
>
>
> //Antti
>
>
>
> *From: *Servercert-wg on behalf of
> Chris Clements via Servercert-wg
> *Date: *Monday, 18. March 2024 at 17.32
> *To: *CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List <
> servercert-wg@cabforum.org>
> *Subject:
Hi Chris,
On 18/3/2024 5:32 μ.μ., Chris Clements via Servercert-wg wrote:
Intellectual Property (IP) Disclosure:
- While not a Server Certificate Working Group Member, researchers
from Princeton University presented at Face-to-Face 58, provided
academic expertise, and highlighted
SC-067
V1: "Require domain validation and CAA checks to be performed from
multiple Network Perspectives”
*Purpose of Ballot SC-067*:
This Ballot proposes updates to the /Baseline Requirements for the
Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates/
(i.e., TLS BRs) re
be recycled or how that pans out?
//Antti
From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Chris
Clements via Servercert-wg
Date: Monday, 18. March 2024 at 17.32
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] Discussion Period Begins - Ballot SC-067 V1: "Require
d
