On 19/4/2024 9:54 μ.μ., Aaron Gable wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:07 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
Servercert-wg wrote:
What happens if the SA/ToS document changes? I had the impression
that the ACME client would be able to see the new version and ask
that the
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:07 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via
Servercert-wg wrote:
> What happens if the SA/ToS document changes? I had the impression that the
> ACME client would be able to see the new version and ask that the updated
> version is accepted. How does this process work in
On 18/4/2024 7:58 μ.μ., Aaron Gable via Servercert-wg wrote:
1. Section 9.6.1 adds language that imposes or makes the following
requirements explicit:
i. the Subscriber has been provided with the most current
version of the Subscriber Agreement;
ii. the
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 8:12 AM Wayne Thayer via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:
> I have three questions about the implications of changes proposed by this
> ballot:
>
> 1. Section 9.6.1 adds language that imposes or makes the following
> requirements explicit:
>
>> i. the
I have three questions about the implications of changes proposed by this
ballot:
1. Section 9.6.1 adds language that imposes or makes the following
requirements explicit:
> i. the Subscriber has been provided with the most current version of the
> Subscriber Agreement;
> ii. the applicable
Purpose of Ballot SC-071
This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and
Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to Subscriber Agreements
and Terms of Use. It combines the requirements for both into only the
Subscriber Agreement and clarifies the
