Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Backman, Antti via Servercert-wg
Telia votes ‘Yes’ on ballot SC-72 //Antti From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Date: Monday, 25. March 2024 at 14.01 To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

2024-03-26 Thread Ben Wilson via Servercert-wg
All, I would like to help start up the patent advisory group. If you are interested in participating or having your IP counsel involved, please email me directly. Thanks, Ben On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:32 AM Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg < servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote: > During the review

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Brittany Randall via Servercert-wg
GoDaddy votes "Yes" on ballot SC-72 Best, Brittany Randall From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 5:00 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg]

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL]-Re: [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Pedro FUENTES via Servercert-wg
OISTE votes YES to SC-72 > > From: Servercert-wg > On Behalf Of Paul van > Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 11:01 AM > To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List > mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org>> >

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Adrian Mueller via Servercert-wg
SwissSign votes yes to Ballot SC-72. Adrian Michael Mueller Product Manager Certificate Services +41 43 811 05 97 adrian.muel...@swisssign.com From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Sent: Friday, March 15,

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Scott Rea via Servercert-wg
eMudhra votes "yes" to ballot SC-72 From: Servercert-wg on behalf of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Date: Friday, 15 March 2024 at 4:01 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Discussion Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Antonis Eleftheriadis via Servercert-wg
HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC-72. AE On 25/3/24 14:00, Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg wrote: This ballot updates the TLS Extended Validation Guidelines (EVGs) by removing the exceptions to policyQualifiers​ in section 9.7, to align them with the Baseline Requirements (BRs). The

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete except to policyQualifiers in EVGs; align with BRs by making them NOT RECOMMENDED

2024-03-26 Thread Bruce Morton via Servercert-wg
Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC-72. Bruce. From: Servercert-wg On Behalf Of Paul van Brouwershaven via Servercert-wg Sent: Monday, March 25, 2024 8:01 AM To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Voting Period Begins]: SC-72 - Delete

Re: [Servercert-wg] Notice of review period: Ballot SC70: Clarify the use of DTPs for Domain Control Validation

2024-03-26 Thread Inigo Barreira via Servercert-wg
During the review period one member has filled an exclusion notice and according to article 2.4, point 9 of the bylaws, the results of the initial vote are rescinded and deemed null and void. A Patent Advisory Group (PAG) will be formed, in accordance with Section 7 of the IPR Policy, to address