Purpose of Ballot SC-071
This ballot proposes updates to the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and
Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates related to Subscriber Agreements
and Terms of Use. It combines the requirements for both into only the
Subscriber Agreement and clarifies the
Hi Aaron,
Your proposed phrasing sounds good to me and matches what I had in mind as the
end result of the changes represented in Set 1, just structured slightly
differently.
Cheers,
-Clint
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 9:47 AM, Aaron Gable wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Clint Wilson
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Clint Wilson via Servercert-wg <
servercert-wg@cabforum.org> wrote:
> In other words, I believe it satisfactory to establish a constrained set
> of Debian weak keys which CAs must block (rather than leaving the
> requirement fully open-ended), but I don’t believe
Hi Wayne,
Agreed, your proposal [1] is basically what I was describing; I only added that
it would be useful, in my mind, to add a repository usable by Certificate
Issuers (but not required to be used) similar to what we’ve provided for ROCA
and Close Primes.
However, based on the discussion
