Hi,
could please somebody from servicability sponsor this tiny change?
Thanks,
Goetz.
-Original Message-
From: hotspot-dev [mailto:hotspot-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of
Coleen Phillimore
Sent: Freitag, 16. Januar 2015 23:56
To: hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re:
Thanks for the review. Would you help me push this (exported changeset
attached)?
Thanks,
Mikael
On 2015-02-04 17:56, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
Looks good!
-JB-
On 4.2.2015 16:13, Mikael Auno wrote:
Hi, could I have a review for this small change to ignore three tests.
Issue:
Hi, this is a round 2 review of the proposed solution.
Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8067447
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8067447/webrev.02
This patch is a precursor for implementing
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8054890 which itself is a part
of
Dear David,
I took a look at all occurrences of PeriodicTask_lock. We are in luck:
PeriodicTask::enroll and PeriodicTask::disenroll check for safepoints when
acquiring PeriodicTask_lock.
PeriodicTask::time_to_wait and PeriodicTask::real_time_tick are called only
by the watcher thread.
Since you’re saying it only fixes it partially should we file a followup bug
and maybe leave a comment behind?
On Feb 4, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Roland Westrelin roland.westre...@oracle.com
wrote:
buildreplayjars sometimes fail with an exception and I think that's
caused by the lack of
Hi,
Just add a few more words to explain the benefit on debug experience...
If with that fix(hmmm, I just assumed that the fix in previous discussion
already covered all the cases to make the RewriteFrequentPairs work in
debug mode)
we at least give the user another option to enable the
On 04.02.2015 17:16, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Since you’re saying it only fixes it partially should we file a followup bug
and maybe leave a comment behind?
I think this one is related:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015848
Best,
Tobias
On Feb 4, 2015, at 7:04 AM, Roland
Looks good. -Tao (tamao)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Yasumasa Suenaga yasue...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need more reviewer.
Could you review it?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8068589/webrev.02/
Thanks,
Yasumasa
2015/01/28 17:24 Staffan Larsen staffan.lar...@oracle.com:
Staffan,
Are you OK to push the changes?
-Dmitry
On 2015-02-03 16:01, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Everyone,
Please review the fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8072395/webrev.01/
1. I was wrong in my assumption that the test can't run more than an
hour of physical machine
This is obsolete, it stuck in the queue waiting moderator approval.
Sorry,
Goetz.
-Original Message-
From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net]
On Behalf Of Lindenmaier, Goetz
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 11:40 AM
To:
Looks good.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 2/4/15 4:04 PM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
buildreplayjars sometimes fail with an exception and I think that's
caused by the lack of support for default methods when the SA dumps
classes. This change fixes it at least partially. It may not be the
Hi Roland,
On 5/02/2015 1:04 AM, Roland Westrelin wrote:
buildreplayjars sometimes fail with an exception and I think that's
caused by the lack of support for default methods when the SA dumps
classes. This change fixes it at least partially. It may not be the
cleanest way to support default
buildreplayjars sometimes fail with an exception and I think that's
caused by the lack of support for default methods when the SA dumps
classes. This change fixes it at least partially. It may not be the
cleanest way to support default methods but it already proved useful
when investigating a
Roland,
Looks good for me! (not a reviewer)
Thank you for doing it.
-Dmitry
On 2015-02-04 18:04, Roland Westrelin wrote:
buildreplayjars sometimes fail with an exception and I think that's
caused by the lack of support for default methods when the SA dumps
classes. This change fixes it at
Hi, could I have a review for this small change to ignore three tests.
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072472
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miauno/8072472/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Mikael
15 matches
Mail list logo