Re: [slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman: Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!! Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's original version clearly and tersely describes the (gradual) transition from a logging framework other than SLF4J up to the point where just SLF4J backed

Re: [slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

Small correction: the 'original' version is David's (jakartaman). For the rest I agree. Regards, Erik. Op 14-08-11 13:35, Thorsten Möller schreef: Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman: Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!! Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's

Re: [slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

Am 14.08.2011 um 17:33 schrieb Erik van Oosten: Small correction: the 'original' version is David's (jakartaman). uups, sorry ;-) Thorsten For the rest I agree. Regards, Erik. Op 14-08-11 13:35, Thorsten Möller schreef: Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman: Now

Re: [slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

Hi all, I've updated the illustrations taking into account your comments. The updated files are located at: http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png The audience