Hi List.
Does anyone know of a way to block mail sent to an invalid, random
localpart.
E,G.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are getting a lot of mails with TO addresses like the ones above.
I know how to stop the ones ending in digits but not these ones.
Any help appreciated.
Many
Spamassassin 2.54 Cobalt Raq4 w/sendmail, mailscanner, Clam antivirus
I need very badly a rule that will check for forged FROM as being a domain
on my server.. I get tons like this daily.. I saw one on someone's web site
or here on the group last week, copied it then the computer locked up before
Hello all,
I have a question regarding the way in which SA deals
with whitelisting blacklisting. If I want to whitelist
all but a few select entries from a domain, how would I do it.
Should the following work?
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unwhitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unwhitelist_from
Found the problem.. user error.. I thought I had taken the -t option off
of the syslog startup.. So sometime after the first time, when I
manually started syslogd to test this.. I restarted syslogd from the
init script and started running again with the -t option disallowing
connections
Why
Thanks.. ut yes Ishold have stated that.. stop start..
[root admin]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd stop
Shutting down spamd: ok
[root admin]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd start
Starting spamd: spamdCould not create INET socket: Address already in use
IO::Socket::INET: Address already in use
Any other
Frank Pineau Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:16 AM
x sips for every [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ spam you stop.
I don't get spam with that any more. Mine all comes advertising
sildenafil citrate. :/
Which is why I added a while ago:
body SILDENAFIL_CITRATE /sildenafil citrate/i
describe
hello ther
I already install the spamassassing , I use the automatic way cpan, then
I modify the procmail as the example
http://spamassassin.org/dist/procmailrc.example, but I still receive Spam ,
what should I check ???
regards
---
This
Bart Schaefer Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 2:39 PM
It would have been more interesting if you had used different tagged
addresses for each of the unsubscribes, so you could track which one was
the culprit, and look for similarities in the headers of the pre- and
post- unsubscribe spams
I installed SpamAssassin as per the documentations available at
thespamassassin.org. I installed all the dependent modules and it
installedfine w/o any error,I checked and verified using the
command listed in the USAGE file i.e.#Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60#
spamassassin -t sample-nonspam.txt
I have upgraded to 2.60 because this was driving me crazy in 2.55, but the
problem seems to be still there.
Most of the few spams that make it to my inbox are from
some_name my_emailaddy
These trigger the AWL test and come in with a low score, and are not
detected by the FROM_AND_TO_SAME test
eManager Notification *
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Source mailbox: Frank Pineau
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rule/Policy: Profanity
Action: Quarantine to F:\Program
Hi,
We have spamassassin enable for all the domains at our site, but
only few domains require it's usage. Therefor most of the domains
have a whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] entry in the .cf file that is
being updated nightly from our database.
After the last upgrade the whitelist_to stopped
I installed SpamAssassin as per the documentations available at
thespamassassin.org. I instaleld all the dependent modules and it
installedfine w/o any error,I checked and verified using the
command listed in the USAGE file i.e. #Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60#
spamassassin -t sample-nonspam.txt
Hi,
is there a way to block subjects with Umlauted Letters like:
ö ü ä (sorry if it's messesd after mailing)
The spammers are Umlauting words like Viägra. Those Umlauts are quite
difficult to detected. They are converted to ISO Code, or whatever.
In my language there is no Umlauts. So, it's
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Tristan Nixon wrote:
Hello all,
I have a question regarding the way in which SA deals
with whitelisting blacklisting. If I want to whitelist
all but a few select entries from a domain, how would I do it.
Should the following work?
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Debbie D wrote:
Thanks.. ut yes Ishold have stated that.. stop start..
[root admin]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd stop
Shutting down spamd: ok
[root admin]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd start
Starting spamd: spamdCould not create INET socket: Address already in use
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eManager Notification *
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Love the stupid -PC- double-talk here. Gee, what was the content
sensitive to? (is it sensitve to light, heat, shock...)
Hi,
I was wondering how I can use sa-learn to train a system-wide Bayesian
database? The way I've set-up SA at the moment is that each user has a
.forward file which runs |/usr/bin/procmail -f- and that in turn reads
the .procmailrc file containing the recipie to forward the mail to
spamc.
Hi list.
I have attached a spam i keep getting, from different senders.
This keeps getting through and I cannot find a way to deny it.
I am running SA-2.60, exim 4.24 and the exiscan patch with sa-exim-3.1.
The SA server is the gatewauy to our exchange mailboxes.
Any help on this appreciated.
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.Spamassassins reads in the message
2. It then stores the original message in two variables
3. In the second variable remove all punctuation, spaces,
special encoded
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:39:42AM +, Martyn Drake wrote:
I was wondering how I can use sa-learn to train a system-wide Bayesian
database? The way I've set-up SA at the moment is that each user has a
.forward file which runs |/usr/bin/procmail -f- and that in turn reads
the
This sounds like my earlier problem trying to sa-learn large mailboxes.
Others here commented that it must be a hardware problem, but my box is
fairly new with very decent components (built from scratch by me but with
good MB and memory, etc.) and nothing else I do, including using X, gives
it
--On Sunday, November 09, 2003 12:01 AM + Derek Jennings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These trigger the AWL test and come in with a low score, and are not
detected by the FROM_AND_TO_SAME test which ought to find them.
That test looks like it compares the entire From and To line, not just the
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:25:57 -0500
Colin A. Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
I have a client who can NEVER seem to get spacing down. I don't know
if he can't type well or what but he always misses spaces after
sentences, never uses the right punctuation, etc. Much like this
example
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Spamassassin mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Looking for Rules
So as not to hijack the original thread, I will start a new one.
How to activate localization: ok_locales on|off?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more!
Lukreme wrote:
On 10 Nov 2003, at 07:33, Terry Milnes wrote:
The typical user is capable of making toast in his electric toaster,
but when it comes to the overwhelming complexities involved in
operating a computer he is totally lost. He will become extremely
agitated when he looses the *REALLY
I have been considering using the bayes site wide, however I have seen a
lot of opinions that oppose its use this way. Furthermore I did/do have
doubts as to how well it would work.
There is no way that I can allow users to add their own mail to the
corpus, they'll screw it up.
I guess I
Does anyone know of a good (complete) Administration how-to that covers
SpamAssassin called via MimeDefang working with Sendmail?
I've got it all up and running, but I get the feeling I'm really missing
the tuning and maintenance part of the equation.
---
An insult from an idiot is equal to
Hello!
I was wondering what rbl lists you guys use to block dynamic IP ranges. I
will use it on a gateway relay-only server, which makes anti-virus and
anti-spam and then forwards messages to end server. It's a postfix box.
The intention is to disallow any adsl, dial-up or dynamic/static address
and what happens when you run spamd -D from the command line?
Rajdeep Larha wrote:
I installed SpamAssassin as per the documentations available at the
spamassassin.org. I instaleld all the dependent modules and it installed
fine w/o any error,
I checked and verified using the command listed in
I use dialups.visi.com and dynablock.easynet.nl.
- Original Message -
From: Marcio Merlone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SA List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] What Dynamic IPs rbl list?
Hello!
I was wondering what rbl lists you guys use to
At 06:07 AM 11/11/2003, Sergey V. Baldin wrote:
How to activate localization: ok_locales on|off?
It's not an on/off thing, you need to pick a list of locales that are ok..
The current list of locales is:
en - Western character sets in general
ja - Japanese character sets
Hi list.
I have attached a spam i keep getting, from different senders.
This keeps getting through and I cannot find a way to deny it.
*snip*
Regards,
Tom Kinghorn
It seems to be plain text, not HTML. It has the yahoo redirect that has been
discussed recently. There is a rule for it
At 09:30 AM 11/11/2003, Marcio Merlone wrote:
I was wondering what rbl lists you guys use to block dynamic IP ranges. I
will use it on a gateway relay-only server, which makes anti-virus and
anti-spam and then forwards messages to end server. It's a postfix box.
dynablock seems to work pretty well
At 04:56 AM 11/11/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
I have attached a spam i keep getting,
no, you've quoted it in text-only form without all the headers... All I can
tell from what you posted is it's using bayes poison.. There's no way from
that little snippet to see what rules the email matched.
Maximo Lopez wrote:
hello ther
I already install the spamassassing , I use the automatic way cpan, then
I modify the procmail as the example
http://spamassassin.org/dist/procmailrc.example, but I still receive Spam ,
what should I check ???
regards
The procmailrc.example uses 'spamc', the
The intention is to disallow any adsl, dial-up or
dynamic/static address on such lines to send any mail to this
server. I will have a separated smtp server for my customers... ;)
Bad, bad, bad idea!!!
There are many many people running home networks in dynamic space who send
their mail thru
I use Bayes for site-wide and love it. I have a recipe in my Procmail to
grab any message that scores between 6 and 10, and store it in a suspect
MBOX. Once a week I look through this for false positives and move to a
ConfirmedHam MBOX, and move the rest to ConfirmedSPAM MBOX. I look at
the
On 11 Nov 2003, at 01:45, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Love the stupid -PC- double-talk here. Gee, what was the content
sensitive to? (is it sensitve to light, heat, shock...)
Stupidity, of
Hello
I think I figured something out, and I just want to confirm:
Am I correct in understanding now that the SQL user preferences system only
works when you run Spam Assassin through Procmail? Can it be set up to run
from the Spamass-Milter?
Thanks.
Tim
Good morning guys!
Im new to spamassassin. I have it set up on a redhat 8 box with sophos and
amavisd-new.
It seem to be working out of the box but I have a few questions.
(Maybe someone can point me to some docs?)
1. I know spamassassin works on a point system, but does it learn as time
goes
On 06 Nov 2003, at 20:26, Keith C. Ivey wrote:
Chr. von Stuckrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created the following rule for them
# Special abused yahoo-redirector
uri YAHOO_REDIR /srd.yahoo.com\/drst\/illuminating\/\*http:/
score YAHOO_REDIR 2
describe YAHOO_REDIRcontains url of
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:00:00 -0500
Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The intention is to disallow any adsl, dial-up or
dynamic/static address on such lines to send any mail to this
server. I will have a separated smtp server for my customers... ;)
Bad, bad, bad idea!!!
There are many
On 11 Nov 2003, at 07:30, Marcio Merlone wrote:
I was wondering what rbl lists you guys use to block dynamic IP
ranges. I
will use it on a gateway relay-only server, which makes anti-virus and
anti-spam and then forwards messages to end server. It's a postfix box.
reject_rbl_client
Hi,
Does anyone have any comments on the quality of the cbl.abuseat.org
DNSBL? I noticed that it isn't used in SpamAssassin, but it is one of
the black lists checked by spamcop. Is anyone else using this list?
The purpose of the CBL is to list open proxies (of all types) which
have been
You need to wait for all of spamd's children to die, including all of the
spamc's. This can take a while on a busy and/or slow server. This works
for me most of the time:
#!/bin/bash
PID=`awk '{print $1}' /var/run/spamd.pid`
kill -TERM $PID wait || echo ERROR!
Seems well regarded.
I'm currently logging any hits to see if it's worth adding to my per user
DNSBLs that I use to reject mail to the people who get the most spam.
The ones at http://abuse.easynet.nl are also well worth a look.
regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Robert James
At 11:00 AM 11/11/2003, Bill wrote:
Bad, bad, bad idea!!!
There are many many people running home networks in dynamic space who send
their mail thru their isp server. These will all get caught and trashed by
your plan. You better have a VERY good explanation why you just alienated
hundreds of
On 11 Nov 2003, at 10:09, Robert James Kaes wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any comments on the quality of the cbl.abuseat.org
DNSBL? I noticed that it isn't used in SpamAssassin, but it is one of
the black lists checked by spamcop. Is anyone else using this list?
I use it a the postfix level to
I want to block those selling [EMAIL PROTECTED]@, asian porn, and such
un-wanted material, which represents about 50% of the traffic
(pure guess). There will be some spam that will then be
easaly downloaded by our customers and then filtered.
Again, I feel deleting ANY mail addressed to
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory
but not getting filter. What I have to do with this?
For e.g I have to filter the vulgar stuff. But it does not filterit. My
local.cf is as follows:-
#
--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:58 AM -0800 Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. I know spamassassin works on a point system, but does it learn as time
goes by?
See the topics on SpamAssassin's Learn Feature. You'll need to feed it ham
and spam for it to learn.
2. My compnay wants to block all
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:29:27 -0500
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:00 AM 11/11/2003, Bill wrote:
Bad, bad, bad idea!!!
Bad, bad, bad assumption! :)
LOL
Matt is right. I will block just direct-delivery. :)
--
Marcio Merlone
Hi there,
I'm installing a Spam Gateway Email Server in a FreeBSD server with
Postfix+Amavisd+SpamAssassin
and a followed this howto http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html.
All it's appear ok, but when I send a email with the sample_spam.txt or
other spam example file to a external email or
send
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 13:04:46 -0500
Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to block those selling [EMAIL PROTECTED]@, asian porn, and such
un-wanted material, which represents about 50% of the traffic
(pure guess). There will be some spam that will then be
easaly downloaded by our
At 12:58 PM 11/11/2003, Dan wrote:
1. I know spamassassin works on a point system, but does it learn as time
goes by?
IF you use the bayes subsystem, which is on by default but untrained as
well, SA will engage in some automatic learning for the bayes rules. The
remaining rules are static ones,
Greetings,
Is there a legitimate reason not to blacklist email.com? I just seem to
get way too much SPAM from email.com.
Regards,
Pete
Peter P. Benac, CCNA
Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
Providing Systems and Network Consulting, Training, Web Hosting Services
Phone: 919-847-1740 or
just the obious answer, if someone who has a legitimate account there tries
to send you email it will get flagged as spam..
-Original Message-
From: Peter P. Benac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 18:17
To: 'SpamAssassin'
Subject: [SAtalk] A black listing question
If you use Windows and Outlook, try Cloudmark's Spamnet product. It's
the commercial version of razor, and feeds the same backend database.
I think it's still free to use. http://www.cloudmark.com
As far as looking up status, there's no official way to do it. You could
create a unique
Chip Paswater wrote:
If you use Windows and Outlook, try Cloudmark's Spamnet product. It's
the commercial version of razor, and feeds the same backend database.
I think it's still free to use. http://www.cloudmark.com
No it's not free (subscription is $1.99 a month or something) but there
At 03:45 AM 11/11/2003, David B Funk wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eManager Notification *
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Love the stupid -PC- double-talk here. Gee, what was the content
sensitive to?
- Original Message -
From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Marcio Merlone' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'SA List'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] What Dynamic IPs rbl list?
The intention is to disallow any adsl, dial-up or
dynamic/static address on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter P. Benac
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:17 PM
To: 'SpamAssassin'
Subject: [SAtalk] A black listing question
Greetings,
Is there a legitimate reason not to blacklist email.com?
At 12:31 PM 11/11/2003, Rajdeep Larha wrote:
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules directory
but not getting filter.
Um what do you mean by Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the
rules
2. My compnay wants to block all swears (dont ask me why!)
How can this
be done?
Write some custom rules with high scores:
bodyLOCAL_SWEARWORD1/\bf***\b/i
score LOCAL_SWEARWORD1 10.0
Substitute f*** for your favorite swear word.. Be sure to
frame your swear words
Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. I know spamassassin works on a point system, but does it learn as
time goes by?
sa-learn (Bayes)
2. My compnay wants to block all swears (dont ask me why!) How can
this be done?
A really, REALLY bad idea.
Part of a good system admin's job is convincing
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Lukreme wrote:
uri YAHOO_REDIR /srd.yahoo.com\/drst\/.*\*http:/
Quick (stupid) question. What is the best place to add rules where
they will not get blown away via an upgrade?
Give a go at putting it in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf --
that's where I put
You've just described how spamassassin works.
So I'm pretty certain the you don't want to sit at a command line,
saving your mails to text files, and checking them one-by-one. What is
it that you would LIKE to do, really? Chances are someone's already
doing it. Do you have a non-*n?x
Not having ever run a UNIX mail server, I find the existing documentation and
configuration info for spamassasin quite mystifying. I'd prefer not to go
with the UNIX method of handling mail and mailboxes, and I certainly don't
want it screwing with my ISP's smtp server. I'd like to just cut
I don't know if this really fits in this subject or not. However, I keep
thinking while reading this thread if anyone considers real opt-in
advertisements/messages that get tagged by SA (like from OshKosh,
Travelocity, Lands' End, etc.) to be a FP or not. Do site-wide Bayes
installs have a hard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Harris
I have a regex type question, I think, about local examples
like the on above. Can you put multiple words on a single check
such as:
Body LOCAL_SWEARWORD1
At 01:19 PM 11/11/2003, Joao Pedro wrote:
I'm installing a Spam Gateway Email Server in a FreeBSD server with
Postfix+Amavisd+SpamAssassin
and a followed this howto http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html.
All it's appear ok, but when I send a email with the sample_spam.txt or
other spam example file
Regis,
I had several false positives today based on the BAD_X_HEADERS rule. I'm
using the rules from Chris' site (Nov02). The legitimate emails had an
X-URL header. All of the FPs where from a single mailing list. For what
ever reason, they are providing a valid link to some content within
Just tossing this out as an idea . . .
I have been working on the random text strings. I have talked about this a
little before but only really had one rule. I have started looking at
consonant-vowel-consonant combinations rather than just the long consonant
strings. I checked these
At 01:17 PM 11/11/2003, Peter P. Benac wrote:
Is there a legitimate reason not to blacklist email.com? I just seem to
get way too much SPAM from email.com.
It's a real webmail type service.. So the same arguments that apply for why
you should/should not block hotmail, yahoo, eudoramail, and
Hi Rajdeep,
I have successfully installed the SA. but I am not able to filer the
content. Any stuff which I want to filter in there in the rules
directory
but not getting filter. What I have to do with this?
For e.g I have to filter the vulgar stuff. But it does not filterit.
My
local.cf is
Hey Jennifer,
Fresh popcorn if you would like some. I had one come through today
(which I actually had anticipated, just had to figure out how to write
the rule.) If you use this set, I'd update. It catches quite a lot more
in the tag.
Thanks for the update. :)
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Yackley, Matt wrote:
Scott,
This would probably be a little better cleaner looking:
body LOCAL_SWEARWORD /\b(?:word1|word2|word3|word4)\b/i
And in case anyone else unfamiliar with regex is wondering about that
question mark followed by a colon - it is a special code
Well now that you mention it!!!
OK OK I guess I'll tweak the rules some more.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Kettler
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 14:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'SpamAssassin'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] A
I've got a site-wide bayes database that I'm not sure is correctly
configured. It's quite a large database, and I think it may not have
been converted to the new DB format when I upgraded. When I try to
run a sa-learn --dump magic, I get the following output:
Use of uninitialized value in
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
Here are the directory entries:
-rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 3148 Nov 11 12:29 bayes_journal
-rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 2652 Oct 1 10:36 bayes_msgcount
-rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 41607168 Nov 11 12:29 bayes_seen
I have been getting several new spams that seem to get past my SA setup..
So far they have come from:
@name-james.com
@name-clark.com
@smegheads.com
They all have wording like.. but with minor variations.. anybody else
seeing these/written any rules to stop these??
I pasted the headers at the
Since we are a company, I don't get too hung up over these. I more worry
about newsletters people get for their work. I usually just delete the
non-business stuff, and don't run them as either spam or ham.
Dan
| -Original Message-
| From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent:
Sorry all,
I jumped the gun.
This does flag it as spam.
Thanks
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] new to spamassassin
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Yackley, Matt wrote:
Scott,
http://spamhammers.nxtek.net
How are those files organized on that site? I couldn't find a link to
the .cf files, so I just tried. Found popcorn.cf and weeds.cf but
backhair.cf doesn't exist...
I only linked the popcorn.cf on the site (as a temp download until Chris
S. is able to
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
Here are the directory entries:
-rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 3148 Nov 11 12:29 bayes_journal
-rw--- 1 amavisd amavisd 2652 Oct 1 10:36 bayes_msgcount
-rw--- 1 amavisd
Hi Guenther,
Fresh popcorn if you would like some. I had one come through today
(which I actually had anticipated, just had to figure out how to
write
the rule.) If you use this set, I'd update. It catches quite a lot
more
in the tag.
Thanks for the update. :)
My Pleasure!
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:00:05PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
I was running perl 5.005 back then, but I've upgraded to 5.8.1 now.
Should I try running the import again?
You might want to try that. The error you're reporting seems to occur
when the DB is not accessible, likely for writing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ted Cabeen wrote:
I've got a site-wide bayes database that I'm not sure is correctly
configured. It's quite a large database, and I think it may not have
been converted to the new DB format when I upgraded. When I try to
run a sa-learn --dump magic,
Hey guys!
This works great! However, it seems to not throw a SPAM tag inot the logs
but says content reject. Can that be changed at all? I want to write some
shell scripts for reporting.
Thanks
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Charles Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Darn it!!! Wget again Guenther. I'm sorry. I STILL didn't have the
right Weeds set up there. It is right now.
Wow... time to call it a day I think. :) Sorry for the trouble.
-Original Message-
From: guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:14 PM
To:
I think I solved this problem by removing my email address from the
AWL. No need for it to be in there.
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mojo
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Derek Jennings wrote:
I have upgraded to 2.60 because this was driving me crazy in 2.55, but the
PPB == Peter P Benac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PPB Is there a legitimate reason not to blacklist email.com? I just
PPB seem to get way too much SPAM from email.com.
email.com (along with many others, such as mail.com) is hosted by
outblaze. they have stated publicly that if any mail from any
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:00:05PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
I was running perl 5.005 back then, but I've upgraded to 5.8.1 now.
Should I try running the import again?
You might want to try that. The error you're reporting seems to occur
when the
Rod Begbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ted Cabeen wrote:
I've got a site-wide bayes database that I'm not sure is correctly
configured. It's quite a large database, and I think it may not have
been converted to the new DB format when I
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Tyler Montbriand wrote:
Not having ever run a UNIX mail server, I find the existing
documentation and configuration info for spamassasin quite mystifying.
I'd prefer not to go with the UNIX method of handling mail and
mailboxes, and I certainly don't want it screwing
Hi Jennifer,
I read your mail. But this is something little above it. There are certain
words in 20_porn.cf. When I use only those words even then the rating given
is too low. I used 5 words from the list in same case.. even then the mail
was given only 1.4 points...Any idea?
I can write my won
Robert Leonard III wrote:
I have been getting several new spams that seem to get past my SA setup..
So far they have come from:
@name-james.com
@name-clark.com
@smegheads.com
They all have wording like.. but with minor variations.. anybody else
seeing these/written any rules to stop these??
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:13:27PM -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
I think I solved this problem by removing my email address from the
AWL. No need for it to be in there.
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The developers are still pondering it, however for me, the patch
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
