m 2016 to 2017 and one of
> expected/got is taking this into account and the other isn't?
> Graham
> Original message From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> Date:
> 05/01/2017 08:12 (GMT+00:00) To: SQLite mailing list
> <sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org&
From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>
> Date: 05/01/2017 08:12 (GMT+00:00) To: SQLite mailing list <
> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org> Subject: Re: [sqlite] date-2.2c
> tests fail for sqlite-3.16.1 on Fedora / i686
> On 1/4/17, Jakub Dorňák <jakub.dor...@misli.cz> wrote
; Date:
05/01/2017 08:12 (GMT+00:00) To: SQLite mailing list
<sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org> Subject: Re: [sqlite] date-2.2c tests
fail for sqlite-3.16.1 on Fedora / i686
On 1/4/17, Jakub Dorňák <jakub.dor...@misli.cz> wrote:
> Example output:
>
> ...
> ! date-
On 1/4/17, Jakub Dorňák wrote:
> Example output:
>
> ...
> ! date-2.2c-1 expected: [06:28:00.001]
> ! date-2.2c-1 got: [06:28:00.000]
> ! date-2.2c-4 expected: [06:28:00.004]
> ! date-2.2c-4 got: [06:28:00.003]
> ! date-2.2c-7 expected: [06:28:00.007]
> !
Example output:
...
! date-2.2c-1 expected: [06:28:00.001]
! date-2.2c-1 got: [06:28:00.000]
! date-2.2c-4 expected: [06:28:00.004]
! date-2.2c-4 got: [06:28:00.003]
! date-2.2c-7 expected: [06:28:00.007]
! date-2.2c-7 got: [06:28:00.006]
! date-2.2c-8 expected: [06:28:00.008]
!
5 matches
Mail list logo