g
regular structure back to the user.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:16 PM Hick Gunter wrote:
> 100k distinct column names? Or is that 1 repeats of 10 attributes?
100k distinct names. Like each column a different gene expression.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mita
reasons why this limit is so low (even if we
extend it during compiling, it can be at most 32k columns), while
others are comfortably large? Any plans to extend this limit in the
future?
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
the main use case would be sub-sampling rows.
Mitar
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 4:11 PM Donald Griggs wrote:
>
> So if character-separated values (CSV-ish) were originally your preferred
> import format, would using that format for the blob's work for you?
>
> E.g., Suppose you need to inde
d decoding cells in over multiple rows?
Mitar
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:38 PM Hick Gunter wrote:
>
> I have the impression that you still do not grasp the folly of a 100k column
> schema.
>
> See the example below, which only has 6 fields. As you can see, each field
> requires a
t modifying to original data too
much. I do hear suggestions to do such transformation, but that is
less ideal for our use case.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.
embed, that approach would be useful. Like composite value
types.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
n keep the existing 2000 limit, but to support it without having to
recompile, people could increase it all the way to 2 billion. Is there
any significant performance downside to this?
[1] https://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html
Mitar
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:21 PM Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> SQLite coul
Hi!
In that case we would have to define a standard BLOB storage format,
slightly defeating the idea of using SQLite to define such standard
future-proof format. :-)
Mitar
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:19 AM Hick Gunter wrote:
>
> Since your data is at least mostly opaque in the
ised
that it says "Many bioinformatics researchers use SQLite in this way."
With limit on 2000 columns this is a very strange claim. I would love
to see a reference here and see how they do that. I might learn
something new.
Mitar
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
