Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > > I had completely missed the chart activity, glad you mentioned it. Help is > a strange case, it is was never submitted to ASLO. > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4051 repository: https://github.com/godiard/help-activity Other activities still in my personal github:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > fonts-1.xo > If this refer to http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4669 ther repository is: https://github.com/godiard/favorite-fonts-activity I can transfer it to sugarlbas if needed. About all this movement, two comments (just ahumble opinion of a retired sugar devel) *

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-24 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, James Thanks. I think we are getting to a productive discussion. I doubt if there are many who have updated the activity.info to link to a personal repository (not an organization repository). However, certainly those requests should be honored. If a developer has his own private (not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-24 Thread James Cameron
Yes, I'm familiar with the ASLO hosting directory on download.sugarlabs.org with the (currently) four digit identification. Your understanding is incomplete and to some extent in error. Implode should not be forked from git.sugarlabs.org, as the current maintainer has a public copy in their

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-24 Thread Tony Anderson
Apparently my English is a bit garbled. I apologize. What I am doing is going down the list of activities on ASLO as shown in download.sugarlabs.org where each activity is given a four digit 'add-on' identification. There were 137 with repositories already on github. For these, the needed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:48:16AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > 1. The original repository is ASLO. No, the originals were mostly on laptop.org and on developer web sites, including Gitorious and GitHub. > The git.sugarlabs.org was added later. No, the Sugar Labs Gitorious instance was set up

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread James Cameron
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:21:40AM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > Hi James, Walter > > I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in > github/ sugarlabs. > > Of these 47 are not duplicates to repositories on git.sugalabs.org. But you omit repositories in other than

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
1. The original repository is ASLO. The git.sugarlabs.org was added later. The intent, as I understand it, is to have the master source code under git version control on github as a replacement for git.sugarlabs.org. The git record of the programming change from version to version should be

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:21:21PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > > On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license. > > That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer > true. In fact

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread Dave Crossland
On Apr 23, 2017 11:21 PM, "Tony Anderson" wrote: Hi James, Walter I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in github/sugarlabs Thank you Tony! Unless I hear to the contrary, I'll delete these duplicates. Sounds good to me My understanding from the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi James, Walter I reviewed the 71 activities for which I created a repository in github/sugarlabs. Of these 47 are not duplicates to repositories on git.sugalabs.org. The duplicates are: abecedarium-5.xo amazonas_tortuga-2.xo analyze_journal-5.xo analyze-8.xo anno-1.xo annotate-1.xo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread Dave Crossland
On Apr 23, 2017 7:08 PM, "James Cameron" wrote: We cannot host repositories on GitHub that don't have a license. That was true in the early days of github but it's no longer true. In fact it's a big problem, because a lot of stuff is posted on github without a libre license

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Activities added to GithHub

2017-04-23 Thread James Cameron
Dissent. 1. For the duplication by Tony from activities.sugarlabs.org to github.com/sugarlabs; - for the commit history, we still have the original repository for some activities. - for the source code, now we have two places for some activities; the original repository, and a copy with a