On 10/04/17 14:13, David Balažic wrote:
Cut out the middleman, design a decentralised service, lose a possible point of
failure. ;-)
Decentralisation can be a problem. SMTP mail is designed to be
decentralised, but anyone attempting to use it in that way, these days,
is likely to fall foul
Cut out the middleman, design a decentralised service, lose a possible point of
failure. ;-)
> Subject: Re: Crazy idea?
>
> I'll address that question in its time.
>
> For now, though, I don't want to put the cart before the horse; addressing
> protocols (i.e. XMPP, SIP,
I'll address that question in its time.
For now, though, I don't want to put the cart before the horse; addressing
protocols (i.e. XMPP, SIP, OSCAR, etc.) while still talking about a service
(akin to AIM, YIM, MSN, ICQ, etc.).
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 pid...@alexoren.com wrote:
> First try to answer
First try to answer this one question:
How will your service be better than XMPP (which is an open protocol with
several open-source implementations)?
On 07-04-2017 18:03, pid...@mail.iqk.com wrote:
For years I've contemplated starting an IM service. The idea keeps
coming back to mind as all
For years I've contemplated starting an IM service. The idea keeps coming back
to mind as all the big boys keep dropping out (or the technical equivalent of
dropping out), frustrating their users (including myself).
I cannot, possibly, be the first person to have this thought, right?
