Re: [TCP] broken cross references

2006-12-13 Thread Bill Swallow
I'd say the missing markers would be the culprit. I'd also say it's the localizer's duty to fix what they broke. 2) How was this translated. Is it possible the translator botched something by translating the MIF files or whatnot? Perhaps the translator deleted cross-reference markers? 4) If

Re: [TCP] broken cross references

2006-12-13 Thread Thomas Johnson
Yes, conditional text could be the problem. It's really hard to tell without digging into the files. Another possibility is if you jammed all the files into a single ZIP file without maintaining the relative paths when you sent them out to the translator. By the way, how many files are there? I

Re: [TCP] broken cross references

2006-12-13 Thread Lisa M. Bronson (TCP)
1) You are using relative pathing, correct, where all files live withn the same folder structure and not out on some network drive. This is hard for me to answer. I didn't create this file--it was done by a contractor who filled in while I was on leave taking care of my dad last spring. I had

Re: [TCP] Archive utility [was: broken cross references]

2006-12-13 Thread Brierley, Sean
+1 Archive rocks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jones, Donna Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:32 PM Cc: tcp@techcommpros.com Subject: [TCP] Archive utility [was: broken cross references] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL