Re: Self-introduction: Brian Gribble

On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 22:14 -0400, Brian Gribble wrote: > Good evening, > > My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current > role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products. > Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems Administrator

Re: Self-introduction: Brian Gribble

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:14:23PM -0400, Brian Gribble wrote: > Good evening, > > My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current > role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products. > Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems

Self-introduction: Brian Gribble

Good evening, My name is Brian and I am a Platform Consultant at Red Hat. My current role is supporting a project using PKI along with other Red Hat products. Prior to joining Red Hat I worked as a Linux Systems Administrator using RHEL, and some CentOS, at different companies. I have been

Re: [Test Day Report] DNF 2.0

On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 04:12 -0400, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Hey Testers, > > We just had DNF 2.0 Test Day[1]. The test coverage was awesome and we had a > good mix of new and old contributors. > Thanks to all of you for participating. Also, Igor (Ignatenkobrain) for > helping us through! >

Fedora 26 Beta blocker status mail #1

Hi folks! The Fedora 26 Beta freeze is fast approaching (it's 2017-05- 16), so it's time for a blocker status mail. tl;dr action summary 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448923 ACTION: Preferably, Firefox maintainer (mstransky) to fix build on ARM 2.

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 143 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08 squid-3.5.23-1.fc24 136 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08 exim-4.87.1-1.fc24 99

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On 05/12/2017 06:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: Why would we

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

>> In an extreme situation, a release could be nearly impossible due to >> dependency cycles. > >You'd need to provide specific examples for "extreme" as this has not >happened in recent Fedora history (at least back to F-21) I cannot cite an historical example. With more than a thousand

Fedora 25 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing: Age URL 136 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb exim-4.87.1-1.fc25 34 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25 15

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: >> > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different

Re: New Blocker Criterion Proposal: Same default packages for all arches

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different software on > > different architectures? It might make perfect sense to use browser X

[Test Day Report] DNF 2.0

Hey Testers, We just had DNF 2.0 Test Day[1]. The test coverage was awesome and we had a good mix of new and old contributors. Thanks to all of you for participating. Also, Igor (Ignatenkobrain) for helping us through! Testers: 26 Coverage according to Testcase: