Re: [Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

Michael Matz writes: > Ben, have you finished the patch? If so, please post here, have you > measured compile time to be unaffected (would be bad if such a seldom > used feature would cause a slowdown)? I've not measure but I'd be surprised if there were much impact.

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

Hi, On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Мельников Алексей wrote: --> Urgs. Are you really using digraphs in any production code? --> (Yes, tcc tries to support c99, but, well, I mean, digraphs? Seriously? If you use EBCDIC you have more serious problems with tcc I guess, and if you don't, why use

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

--> Urgs. Are you really using digraphs in any production code? --> (Yes, tcc tries to support c99, but, well, I mean, digraphs? Seriously? If you use EBCDIC you have more serious problems with tcc I guess, and if you don't, why use digraphs? Not as bad as trigraphs, but still.) I am

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

Hi, On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Мельников Алексей wrote: I hope TCC already has supported some C99 options: (Online documents "3.2 ISOC99 extensions"). And I have found this options (C99 tokens) was discussed several years ago:

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

I hope TCC already has supported some C99 options: (Online documents "3.2 ISOC99 extensions"). And I have found this options (C99 tokens) was discussed several years ago: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2007-05/msg00067.html

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

Мельников Алексей writes: > Excuse me, could one added to tcc alternative tokes like that: > <% for { > %> for } > <: for [ > :> for ] > %: for # > %:%: for ## > How hard it is to do? Who can I ask for developing? It's not particularly hard. having already done a little

[Tinycc-devel] Alternative tokens for C-application

Hello. Excuse me, could one added to tcc alternative tokes like that: <% for { %> for } <: for [ :> for ] %: for # %:%: for ## How hard it is to do? Who can I ask for developing? Thank You in advance. Alex Melnikov ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list