Peter Galbavy wrote:
We don't want none of your stinking rationalism and science here!
:) - for the humour impaired.
Science and sound quality. When did this start??
Nonreality's Profile:
Waldo Pepper wrote:
Don't be so silly. Burn in is a term used for long term reliability
and failure analysis of components and component equipment. The sound
won't change, just your perception of it.
What is digital glare? Up there with colour and ambience?
We don't want none of your
ivanyiu wrote:
Hi Guido,
Then I try to follow SBGK's suggestion to update the values. The
crackling gone. but command tt -s show that kernel modification
disabled.
I wonder if I do anything wrong, do you also get the kernel
modification disabled with the tt -s command?
It's fine with
Dazed and Confused wrote:
Thanks for your advice so far.
I suppose all electronics need a 'burn in' time so I'll leave it playing
for a while and see if the digital glare diminishes.
Don't be so silly. Burn in is a term used for long term reliability
and failure analysis of components
guidof wrote:
I use EDO and I also use TT3.0 and SBGK's blog values. In my experience
and to my ears, each of these has enhanced the sound of my main system.
I do not find them to yield a particularly 'digital' sound -- and I
don't find the sound of the unvarnished SBT, with or without
ivanyiu wrote:
Hi Guido,
I try to get what setting you're using to work in my system by failed. I
use a USB DAC, with EDO only it work fine. Intalled TT tt -i, the
playback start crackling. resume to normal with tt -r
Then I try to follow SBGK's suggestion to update the values. The
guidof wrote:
No tweaks to TT before installing it. No vollock, though. However, I do
apply SBGK's blog values after TT is installed.
Regards,
Guido F.
Thanks Guido! I'll look into these.
Best wishes,
Peter
Guido.
Thanks. D#243; you tweak TT 3.0 in any way before you install it after
the Triode app?
Best wishes,
Peter
Rosewind's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33346
View this thread:
Rosewind wrote:
Guido.
Thanks. Do you tweak TT 3.0 in any way before you install it after the
Triode app?
Best wishes,
Peter
No tweaks to TT before installing it. No vollock, though. However, I do
apply SBGK's blog values after TT is installed.
Regards,
Guido F.
SBGK wrote:
the dac won't help, unless you are after better sound quality. TT3.0 has
been reported as making the sound very digital.
I posted some ideas in my blog, see signature below
A cost effective way to improve the ps is
http://www.squeeze-upgrade.com/index.php?language=en
Turnandcough wrote:
Sometimes it's a compromise between smooth and dull vs harsh and
lively. I'll give it another try but for now I find my sound to be as
smooth as it'll probably get with the Touch. (or maybe I'm imagining
things...)
Two comments. First, I find recordings to be far more
mlsstl wrote:
The nice thing for the person playing recordings in their home is that
the only thing that really matters is that they are happy with their
system.
Indeed!
Guido F.
guidof's Profile:
Actually I'm quite happy with my humble Touch based system. I was an
early SB adopter and have converted many to it.
I#8217;m most happy when I play random music and do things about the
house. It allows me to listen to the music, not the system. But just
like the people who own megabuck systems
Dazed and Confused wrote:
Just set up Touch for the first time. FLAC files are being fed via a
wired connection from a Synology DS212+ NAS, then into amp (analogue)
using the supplied leads and thenspeakers. The sound is very digital, ie
bright and and I want to know ways of making it less
SBGK wrote:
the dac won't help, unless you are after better sound quality. TT3.0 has
been reported as making the sound very digital.
Could you please clarify? Which Soundcheck mods make the Touch more
digital-sounding? This is news to me.
Best wishes,
Peter
Rosewind wrote:
Could you please clarify? Which Soundcheck mods make the Touch more
digital-sounding? This is news to me.
Best wishes,
Peter
I use EDO and I also use TT3.0 and SBGK's blog values. In my experience
and to my ears, each of these has enhanced the sound of my main system.
I do
guidof wrote:
I use EDO and I also use TT3.0 and SBGK's blog values. In my experience
and to my ears, each of these has enhanced the sound of my main system.
I use SBT (Tiny SC server) with EDO connected via USB to a Cambridge
Audio Magic 100 (thanks to Triode's great job). In this
pgeorges wrote:
I use SBT (Tiny SC server) with EDO connected via USB to a Cambridge
Audio Magic 100 (thanks to Triode's great job). In this configuration, I
don't think any other tweaking is necessary (TT3.0 or other parameter
tuning) given that the DAC is fed with raw binary data, and the
Dazed and Confused wrote:
Just set up Touch for the first time. FLAC files are being fed via a
wired connection from a Synology DS212+ NAS, then into amp (analogue)
using the supplied leads and thenspeakers. The sound is very digital, ie
bright and and I want to know ways of making it less
Yes, the question bright compared to what? has been asked at least
twice, but not answered yet. And good point re expectations, especially
with the OP's equating of bright with digital (as if CDs were
analog...).
aubuti's
Dazed and Confused wrote:
Just set up Touch for the first time. FLAC files are being fed via a
wired connection from a Synology DS212+ NAS, then into amp (analogue)
using the supplied leads and thenspeakers. The sound is very digital, ie
bright and and I want to know ways of making it less
I would echo the advice of the others but would also suggest that you
consider doing one or both of the following. One load the Triode EDO App
this does seem to help the SBT and adds some naturalness to the output
(I am talking about digital only as that is all I use ) . Two take the
time and
dood wrote:
If you are happy with the sound of your set up with a different source,
eg CD player, then the problem is not your amp or speakers. In that case
an external DAC will make the most difference, certainly more than power
suppiles, cables etc.
Possibly. However, I have three
Dazed and Confused wrote:
Thanks for your advice so far.
The rest of my system (amp speakers) is as follows: Luxman L-505u
Integrated Amplifier Audiosmile Kensai speakers.
I suppose all electronics need a 'burn in' time so I'll leave it playing
for a while and see if the digital
guidof wrote:
There is nothing that needs burn-in time in the Touch. But it's still a
good idea to listen to a variety of music over a few weeks so that you
may fully familiarize yourself with the sound and decide whether or not
it meets your expectations.
Agreed. My earlier suggestion about
Dazed and Confused wrote:
Just set up Touch for the first time. FLAC files are being fed via a
wired connection from a Synology DS212+ NAS, then into amp (analogue)
using the supplied leads and thenspeakers. The sound is very digital, ie
bright and and I want to know ways of making it less
26 matches
Mail list logo
