Re: WebMacro - Admin Scheduler

2000-05-06 Thread jon *
on 5/5/2000 9:33 PM, dave bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to work/rework and integrate the Admin and Scheduler interfaces with WebMacro. I plan to use the BaseWebMacro setup vs. the WebMacroSiteLayout so it'll work out of the box ( you want have to switch pages, etc...). I also plan

Re: WebMacro - Admin Scheduler

2000-05-06 Thread jon *
on 5/6/2000 8:29 AM, dave bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm also over-whelmed with work related applications right now. So i'll be doing this slowly. I want to also jump in on Scarab once I get a little ahead. Cool! I agree. I would actually like to see us use the WebMacroSiteLayout

documentation

2000-05-06 Thread Jon Stevens
fyi (mostly for dave), I'm doing some programmer documentation right now for the WebMacroSite system with easy example code and such...should be done with it soon... -jon -- Java Servlet Based - Open Source |Collab.Net Bug/Issue Tracking System |

wmsitelayout feature request

2000-05-06 Thread jon *
This is mostly for Dave... I want to be able to have a Screen class override the layout template that will be executed by returning a method from Screen.getLayout(). This would happen somewhere in WebMacroSitePage, but I don't want it to interrupt the current scheme of doing the layout search

Re: wmsitelayout feature request

2000-05-06 Thread jon *
on 5/6/2000 3:06 PM, John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The "default" way of specifying a specific layout template for a screen template is to give them the same name. Why do you want to override this behavior in the Screen? Because what if you want to have the layout change based on a

Re: wmsitelayout feature request

2000-05-06 Thread dave bryson
On Sat, 06 May 2000, you wrote: I want to be able to have a Screen class override the layout template that will be executed by returning a method from Screen.getLayout(). This would happen somewhere in WebMacroSitePage, but I don't want it to interrupt the current scheme of doing the layout

Re: wmsitelayout feature request

2000-05-06 Thread jon *
on 5/6/2000 4:00 PM, John McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, How does this sound: 1. WMSitePage finds the Screen for a screen template. 2. Screen.getLayout(data) is called 3. If it returns a name with the default extension from the properties file (or some standards: wm, fm, html,

Re: documentation

2000-05-06 Thread dave bryson
On Sat, 06 May 2000, you wrote: fyi (mostly for dave), I'm doing some programmer documentation right now for the WebMacroSite system with easy example code and such...should be done with it soon... Just read it. Nice Job! -- dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- your

Re: ActionEventListener

2000-05-06 Thread Jon Stevens
on 5/6/2000 4:06 PM, Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will do it at some later date cause I think it is a good idea. :-) Hey all, Sorry to reply to my email, but I just started doing some tests with actually implementing it. It looks like it won't be that hard and is really cool! This

Re: ActionEventListener

2000-05-06 Thread dave bryson
On Sat, 06 May 2000, you wrote: This is mostly to dave, but I'm going to make the WebMacroSiteAction use this methodology by default (all it will have to do is extend the ActionEvent class instead of the Action class) if that is cool with you. If it can't find the "special" methods, then it

Re: ActionEventListener

2000-05-06 Thread jon *
on 5/6/2000 5:45 PM, dave bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool! Along these same lines, what about a way for template authors to specify required fields. Maybe some type of object in the context that could be used. Like this: input type="text" name="$required("fname")" then Turbine could

Re: ActionEventListener

2000-05-06 Thread dave bryson
On Sat, 06 May 2000, you wrote: on 5/6/2000 5:45 PM, dave bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool! Along these same lines, what about a way for template authors to specify required fields. Maybe some type of object in the context that could be used. Like this: input type="text"

Re: ActionEventListener

2000-05-06 Thread Jon Stevens
Ok, I tested it and it now works! check out org.turbine.modules.ActionEvent and org.turbine.modules.actions.WebMacroSiteAction. The javadocs are quite complete for it. Read them for more info. This also validates the recent build()-doBuild()/doPerform() name changes. It was SO easy to add

More Documentation

2000-05-06 Thread Jon Stevens
For those of you not watching the CVS commit messages, I have added a boat load of documentation today... http://java.apache.org/turbine/ If you have been waiting to play with Turbine, now is the time to start. :-) -jon -- Java Servlet Based - Open Source |Collab.Net