origonal question:
ferhadcebi...@gmail.com
5:00 AM (5 hours ago)
to me
Thanks for answer. But, how Ignite will store that datas to store? Will
append to the end of WAL? If, then it is sure faster than storing cache
operations in some 3rd part database.
Ignite does store data to WAL first,
Hello,
Ignite native persistence has a good track record, is fast and reliable,
you can use it in your application.
Take a look at the following example of how to use a streamer to quickly
insert data:
>From anecdotal experience of storing larger objects (up to say 10MB) in
Ignite, I find that the overall access performance is significantly better
than storing lots of small objects. The main thing to watch out for is that
very large objects can cause unbalanced data distribution. Similar to
Denis,
You can't set page size greater than 16Kb due to our page memory
limitations.
чт, 22 авг. 2019 г. в 22:34, Denis Magda :
> How about setting page size to more KBs or MBs based on the average value?
> That should work perfectly fine.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM
I understand from this post:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50116444/unable-to-increase-pagesize/50121410#50121410
that the maximum page size is 16K. Is that still true?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
How about setting page size to more KBs or MBs based on the average value?
That should work perfectly fine.
-
Denis
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Shane Duan wrote:
> Thanks, Ilya. The blob size varies from a few KBs to a few MBs.
>
> Cheers,
> Shane
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:02 AM
Thanks, Ilya. The blob size varies from a few KBs to a few MBs.
Cheers,
Shane
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:02 AM Ilya Kasnacheev
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> How large are these blobs? Ignite is going to divide blobs into <4k
> chunks. We have no special optimizations for storing large key-value pairs.
>
Hello!
How large are these blobs? Ignite is going to divide blobs into <4k chunks.
We have no special optimizations for storing large key-value pairs.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 22 авг. 2019 г. в 02:53, Shane Duan :
> Hi Igniters, is it a good idea to use Ignite(with persistence) as a
Hello,
Feel free to use Ignite .NET for that. Moreover, you have 2 options here:
1. Use .NET standard client (supports most of the APIs but connects to
the cluster via a JVM process started internally). Here is how you can
define its config for entries eviction:
Hello Val
First of all thx for this answer. Let me explain our use case.
*What we are doing*
Our company is a monitoring solution for machines in the manufacturing
industry. We have a hardware logger attached to each machine wich collects
up to 6 different metrics ( like power, piece count ).
Hi Roger,
You can use Ignite-Cassandra integration module. In case you need to load
specific portion of you Cassandra dataset into Ignite you can use
*loadCache(...)* method of Ignite cache API, providing it appropriate CQL
query.
Igor
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Roger Fischer (CW)
Hi,
Note your are trying to use development mode in production!
To bind development web server to all interfaces on your linux machine you
need fix following file:
modules/web-console/frontend/gulpfile.babel.js/webpack/environments/development.js
like this
Hi Denis
Thanks for information, ignite web agent default. properties details are
documented in the link you shared
Can you please give name of property files of back end /frontend which need
to be changed as this is not documented anywhere.
Thanks
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Denis Magda
Yes, you need to give the machine where the console is to be deployed a unique
IP address so that it’s accessible from remote machines. Also you might need to
tweak some of web agent’s configuration parameters if the console should be
linked with a remote Ignite cluster:
Hi, Haithem Turki!
If your yarn cluster running in network without internet, you can use
IGNITE_PATH property. The property allows to use apache ignite build from
hdfs. Also error message isn't clear, I've created ticket [1] for this
issue.
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3268
Thanks all for your responses. Will look into these alternatives.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jörn Franke wrote:
> You seem to look for streaming solutions , such as Spark Streaming or
> Flink Streaming or Storm
>
> > On 18 Jan 2016, at 17:19, Dood@ODDO
Kafka may suit your needs as a "queue" with producer/consumer and
persistence capabilities also.
On 1/18/2016 9:52 AM, Murthy Kakarlamudi wrote:
Hi,
We have a scenario where in we have a c++ application that pumps
out data ticks multiple times in a second. These data ticks needs to
be
Hi Murthy,
It looks like that you can use Ignite Streaming feature [1] with
pre-configured sliding window [2] basing on what you mean under
"temporarily". One of the advantages of Ignite's sliding windows is that
you can query particular events using advanced SQL, text or other queries.
[1]
Hi Denis,
That kind of querying will be extremely helpful if it is supported.
Because in our use case, events sitting in the cache need to be queried
based on time as the criteria before it can be published to the clients.
Looks like the sliding window feature fits perfectly for this. Thanks
Sridhar,
Please check where Ignite home directory refers to in your case. Just
executed the following code
System.out.println(System.getProperty(IgniteSystemProperties.IGNITE_HOME))
Then create 'config' folder there and put default-config. xml in this
folder.
You can always change Ignite
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
But, I am still not clear on this.
I have ignite-config.xml in my project folder (src/main/resources)
I have used JCache API to create and read from the cache.
In ignite-config.xml I have added cacheConfiguration bean's for each of the
caches I have created using
21 matches
Mail list logo