Hi,
Are there any plans for deeper integration with Spark especially Spark SQL? Is
there a roadmap to look at, so I can know what to expect in the future?
Cheers,
Ben
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
> Kudu currently relies on local storage on a POSIX file system. Right now
> there is no support for S3, which would be interesting but is non-trivial
> in certain ways (particularly if we wanted to rely on S3's replication
+1 thanks for adding that Todd.
Mike
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Mike Percy wrote:
>
>> Kudu currently relies on local storage on a POSIX file system. Right now
>> there is no support for S3,
Hi Ben,
Is there anything in particular you are looking for?
Thanks,
Mike
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Benjamin Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans for deeper integration with Spark especially Spark
> SQL? Is there a roadmap to look at, so I can know what to expect
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Jason Heo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Apache Kudu 1.2 on CDH 5.10.
>
> Recently, after reading "Bulk write performance improvements for Kudu 1.4
>
Hi Mike,
I believe what we are looking for is this below. It is an often request use
case.
Anyone know if the Spark package will ever allow for creating tables in Spark
SQL?
Such as:
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE
USING org.apache.kudu.spark.kudu
OPTIONS (Map("kudu.master" -> “",