Hi Nico,
in its current (pretty basic) implementation of the facility group
support, you have to create a facility group:
* with a facility associated as WAREHOUSE: used by the MRP for
inventory levels
* and with a facility associated as PLANT: used by the MRP when it
generates
Hi Jacopo,
my current trunk version is 672765. I already used your suggestion and
configured
a facility as WAREHOUSE and the other as PLANT as follows:
facility associated as WAREHOUSE
Aluminum Door Handles, Plastic Door Handles and Hardboard Door anyone
configured as:
Product type =
Just try to set the inventory settings for the door into the
WAREHOUSE and not into the PLANT.
WAREHOUSE:
door
Product type = Configurable good
ATP=QOH=OQ = 0
Minimum Stock = 10
Jacopo
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:34 AM, nico61 wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
my current trunk version is 672765. I already
in this way, I obtain a third Proposed Purchase Order with a quantity = 10
for the door and
I need to have a requirement for manufacturing orders for the door in the
PLANT
Nico
Jacopo Cappellato-3 wrote:
Just try to set the inventory settings for the door into the
WAREHOUSE and not
how is the BOM of the door setup?
Jacopo
On Jul 11, 2008, at 11:07 AM, nico61 wrote:
in this way, I obtain a third Proposed Purchase Order with a
quantity = 10
for the door and
I need to have a requirement for manufacturing orders for the door
in the
PLANT
Nico
Jacopo
Hello everyone
I have problems in packing configurable and virtual products for shipping.
Here's what I did:
First I ordered (PC001) in the eCommerce module. Then I completed the
production run, and closed it. The problem arised when I try to pack the
items that was ordered.
It seems only
Hi Jacques,
Having a configurable good as a variant of a virtual product seem
impossible. I've tried this both ways, having a configurable good as a
variant to a virtual product, and having a virtual product as a
part/configuration of a configurable good. Both ways doesn't seem to work
(as far
You are welcome Ashish,
It's a way for me to learn, there are much corners in there ;o)
Jacques
From: Ashish Vijaywargiya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Jacques for your valuable reply.
I truly appreciate your efforts.
--
Ashish
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Jacques Le Roux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sharan,
This is a very interestng point. I'm really interested in this, as I want to introduce it also
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-287
Could we share work on this ? BTW here are some clues :
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices
Thanks
Désolé Sharan,
Je n'avais pas remarqué votre réponse.
My apologies
Jacques
From: Sharan-F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Un grand merci monsieur
I'm not an accountant either so I'm getting a local accountant to give me
their feedback.
I've taken a look at your links and I think the key to the problem
Jacques:
I have also done a small amount of testing in this area and it does not
work as far as I can tell. A product can be configurable or variant but
not both.
--
Jack D. McKinney
Walnut Glenn Systems
5001 Jennie Kate Lane
Lexington, KY 40510
Phone: 859.233.4299
Cell:859.433.4299
Thanks to both,
I should defintively have a look too...
Jacques
From: Jack McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacques:
I have also done a small amount of testing in this area and it does not
work as far as I can tell. A product can be configurable or variant but
not both.
--
Jack D. McKinney
some work would have to be done to use the sending address to activate
the UPS rules outside of the US.
To my knowledge this is not implemented at this time.
mike_mcmillan sent the following on 7/10/2008 1:40 PM:
Does anyone have experience shipping international shipments using the UPS
online
Thanks for the input,
Note that you don't need to execute a production run for PC001
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/using+the+UI+to+add+the+PC001
Jacques
From: rnatavio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone
I have problems in packing configurable and virtual products for shipping.
Here's
Hi Bilgin,
I just tried with PC001 and there is nothing to pack. Also Quick Ship says : Warning: no shipments created; could not find
anything ready and needing to be shipped.
Jacques
From: Bilgin Ibryam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In rev. 675929 I did a fix for configurable products (PC001) but
Jacques,
You can do it one of two ways:
1. Create an order for PC001
2. Complete the production run and add the produced PC to the inventory
3. From order view screen use Pack Shipment For Ship Group and then
Pack items for shipment(this will issue the pc from inventory to
shipment)
4. Set
use to be we saw the database info when the driver was found and
the verify of the data base if it was set in the entityengine.
has this been changed?
[java] Caused by: ERROR 42X04: Column 'USER_LDAP_DN' is either not
in any table in the FROM list or appears within a join specification and
is outside the scope of the join specification or appears in a HAVING
clause and is not in the GROUP BY list. If this is a CREATE or ALTER
TABLE
ofbiz handles this with many entities.
if you hope to use ofbiz then I suggest you convert to the ofbiz model.
as far as schemas that is defined in the entityengine.xml,
schema-name=OFBIZ
David Gay sent the following on 7/11/2008 9:47 AM:
Hi all! We are in the process of migrating
Did you run ant run-install?
-Adrian
BJ Freeman wrote:
[java] Caused by: ERROR 42X04: Column 'USER_LDAP_DN' is either not
in any table in the FROM list or appears within a join specification and
is outside the scope of the join specification or appears in a HAVING
clause and is not in the
Could it be related to the changes I made in r675947 and the fix I put in
r676022? I doubt but could you check please ?
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[java] Caused by: ERROR 42X04: Column 'USER_LDAP_DN' is either not
in any table in the FROM list or appears within a join
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM, BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ofbiz handles this with many entities.
That's good news, but which entities would you suggest? I have yet to
find one that will do the job.
if you hope to use ofbiz then I suggest you convert to the ofbiz model.
Yes, that
I am using 674908
will update
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 7/11/2008 10:08 AM:
Could it be related to the changes I made in r675947 and the fix I put
in r676022? I doubt but could you check please ?
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[java] Caused by: ERROR 42X04:
UserLdapDn is a field that was recently added to the userLogin entity.
It sounds like you are running new code on an old version of the entity.
-Adrian
BJ Freeman wrote:
ant clean
ant run-install-seed
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/11/2008 10:01 AM:
Did you run ant run-install?
I'm not having those problems on my local copy.
-Adrian
BJ Freeman wrote:
This is an old db that I keep to find migration errors
I believe the update part of the database
check-on-start=true
add-missing-on-start=true
are not be done or are erroring.
however I can not
I am sure you can get someone here to help you for a fee.
My suggestion is you get familiar with the entities using the webtools.
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/webtools/control/entitymaint (online)
or
https://localhost:8443/webtools/control/entitymaint (on your machine)
then create your mapping
guess I will have to dig into the code that connects the db and find out
what happen to the loging.
thanks.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 7/11/2008 10:58 AM:
I'm not having those problems on my local copy.
-Adrian
BJ Freeman wrote:
This is an old db that I keep to find migration
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Adrian Crum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look at The Data Model Resource Book, chapter 4, Agreements.
Aha! That's the spot we were looking for, thanks a bunch! :-)
I am sure you can get someone here to help you for a fee.
We may do that; a sanity-check of our progress from a seasoned
user/developer would be a good start. Is there a process or etiquette
in place for such things?
My suggestion is you get familiar with the entities using the webtools.
I also get an error with a clean instance (svn st being ok) after a clean-all
and run-install. I have not this issue if I only clean
the olap base (So its not relate to the changes I made recently removing all
entitygroup.xml but BI's)
[java] 2008-07-11 19:52:08,734 (main) [
Hi Scott,
Yes, it was before I removed the entitygroup.xml files and theirs reference
from ofbiz-component files in specialpurpose.
Apart from BI (which use the olap datasource) at least one entitygroup.xml file and its reference from a ofbiz-component file is
needed for now.
I reverted in
so you can see the database driver version at boot up and see the
database(derby) check the tables.
should see old columns being reported as not used.
Scott Gray sent the following on 7/11/2008 12:57 PM:
I'm on rev. 675904 and it works for me.
-Scott
2008/7/12 BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No specific process or etiquette I know, but others may know of it.
you can email someone on the mailing list that seems to know what they
are talking about or you can use the providers list.
you have done pretty good, for only being at it for several weeks.
I have found that doing flat file
Thanks Bilgin,
I did not try yet. But is this normal from a Quick Ship POV ?
Jacques
From: Bilgin Ibryam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacques,
You can do it one of two ways:
1. Create an order for PC001
2. Complete the production run and add the produced PC to the inventory
3. From order view screen
David,
The best way to communicate the data concepts you'd like help mapping
is to use data statement sentences to describe what each data
element (entity, field, etc) means and how it relates to other things.
Don't try to match it up to your current data model, try to describe
it in
35 matches
Mail list logo
