Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-14 Thread Sean Owen
FWIW here is the Databricks statement on it. Not the same as Spark but includes Spark of course. https://databricks.com/blog/2021/12/13/log4j2-vulnerability-cve-2021-44228-research-and-assessment.html Yes the question is almost surely more whether user apps are affected, not Spark itself. On

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-14 Thread Steve Loughran
log4j 1.2.17 is not vulnerable. There is an existing CVE there from a log aggregation servlet; Cloudera products ship a patched release with that servlet stripped...asf projects are not allowed to do that. But: some recent Cloudera Products do include log4j 2.x, so colleagues of mine are busy

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-13 Thread Qian Sun
My understanding is that we don’t need to do anything. Log4j2-core not used in spark. > 2021年12月13日 下午12:45,Pralabh Kumar 写道: > > Hi developers, users > > Spark is built using log4j 1.2.17 . Is there a plan to upgrade based on > recent CVE detected ? > > > Regards > Pralabh kumar

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-13 Thread Sean Owen
* Monday, December 13, 2021 8:25 AM > *To:* Jörn Franke > *Cc:* Pralabh Kumar ; dev ; > user.spark > *Subject:* Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE > > This has come up several times over years - search JIRA. The very short > summary is: Spark does not use log4j 1.x, but its dependenci

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-13 Thread James Yu
: Pralabh Kumar ; dev ; user.spark Subject: Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE This has come up several times over years - search JIRA. The very short summary is: Spark does not use log4j 1.x, but its dependencies do, and that's the issue. Anyone that can successfully complete the surgery at this point

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-13 Thread Sean Owen
This has come up several times over years - search JIRA. The very short summary is: Spark does not use log4j 1.x, but its dependencies do, and that's the issue. Anyone that can successfully complete the surgery at this point is welcome to, but I failed ~2 years ago. On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:02

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-13 Thread Martin Wunderlich
There is a discussion on Github on this topic and the recommendation is to upgrade from 1.x to 2.15.0, due to the vulnerability of 1.x: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/608 This discussion is also referenced by the German Federal Office for Information Security:

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-13 Thread Jörn Franke
Is it in any case appropriate to use log4j 1.x which is not maintained anymore and has other security vulnerabilities which won’t be fixed anymore ? > Am 13.12.2021 um 06:06 schrieb Sean Owen : > >  > Check the CVE - the log4j vulnerability appears to affect log4j 2, not 1.x. > There was

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-12 Thread Holden Karau
My understanding is it only applies to log4j 2+ so we don’t need to do anything. On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 8:46 PM Pralabh Kumar wrote: > Hi developers, users > > Spark is built using log4j 1.2.17 . Is there a plan to upgrade based on > recent CVE detected ? > > > Regards > Pralabh kumar > --

Re: Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-12 Thread Sean Owen
Check the CVE - the log4j vulnerability appears to affect log4j 2, not 1.x. There was mention that it could affect 1.x when used with JNDI or SMS handlers, but Spark does neither. (unless anyone can think of something I'm missing, but never heard or seen that come up at all in 7 years in Spark)

Log4j 1.2.17 spark CVE

2021-12-12 Thread Pralabh Kumar
Hi developers, users Spark is built using log4j 1.2.17 . Is there a plan to upgrade based on recent CVE detected ? Regards Pralabh kumar