Awesome. yep - I have seen the warnings on UDTs, happy to keep up with the
API changes :). Would this be a reasonable PR to toss up despite the API
unstableness or would you prefer it to wait?
Thanks
-Pat
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Michael Armbrust mich...@databricks.com
wrote:
I'll
I'll caution that the UDTs are not a stable public interface yet. We'd
like to do this someday, but currently this feature is mostly for MLlib as
we have not finalized the API.
Having an ordering could be useful, but I'll add that currently UDTs
actually exist in serialized from so the ordering
Hey all,
Currently looking into UDTs and I was wondering if it is reasonable to add
the ability to define an Ordering (or if this is possible, then how)?
Currently it will throw an error when non-Native types are used.
Thanks!
-Pat
