Am 22.04.2014 18:20, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Am 22.04.2014 18:10, schrieb Eddie Epstein:
The current design supports passing a specific view to an annotator:
map the desired view to the default view and do not declare the
annotator view aware by declaring input or output sofas.
An alternate
several
times in an AAE for different views.
Peter
Eddie
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Peter Klügl pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.dewrote:
Hi,
as I understand the implementation, an AE is sofa aware if it specifies
input or output views in its capabilities. Let's say it only specifies
btw, here's the StackOverflow question that caused me to investigate the
problem:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23002788/uima-ruta-sofa-mapping-in-aggregate-pipeline
Peter
Am 17.04.2014 14:04, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi,
as I understand the implementation, an AE is sofa aware
Am 17.04.2014 15:39, schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
On 17.04.2014, at 15:31, Peter Klügl pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
That would work, if the modifier AEs that create new views are not cascaded.
Btw: I think it would be great if UIMA did offer a mechanism that would
allow an AE
fixes
For a full list of the changes, please refer to Jira:
http://uima.apache.org/d/ruta-2.2.0/issuesFixed/jira-report.html
More information about UIMA Ruta can be found here:
http://uima.apache.org/ruta.html
- Peter Klügl, for the Apache UIMA development team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Hi,
contributions are of course welcome.
You can start a discussion on the developer list: d...@uima.apache.org
Contributions are normally performed using Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/uima
You need to create an account, and then to create a new issue providing
information about
Am 20.02.2014 08:50, schrieb Debbie Zhang:
Hi all,
Due to some restriction at work, I have to install UIMA Ruta on Eclipse
manually. Although I have put in all required jar files to the plugins and
features folders, it seems the plugins are not installed properly. I only
First of all,
Hi,
this is probably caused by the absolute paths in the descriptor. Try to
clean the project twice (Menu-Project-Clean) in order to regenerate
the descriptors.
In the next release, UIMA Ruta 2.2.0, this should never happen again.
Best,
Peter
Am 18.02.2014 09:15, schrieb Debbie Zhang:
Hi
Hi,
Am 12.02.2014 23:57, schrieb Nicolas Hernandez:
Hi everyone,
I'm testing the TextRuler framework to induce annotation rules. In
particular I follow the example in the documentation [1] which should works
on the example project present in the svn repository [2].
Unfortunately, when I
maybe something like
cas.getTypeSystem().getType(my.package.AnnotationName)
Best,
Peter
Am 13.02.2014 14:03, schrieb hannes schantl:
Hi,
Is there a way to get an annotation Type from the cas(or Jcas) from a
string.
For example, i am looking for something like that:
Hi,
does anyone have some experience on the performance difference of CAS
annotations and JCAS annotations in real world applications?
I created a trivial testbench that indicates that CAS annotations are
bit faster, but I not sure if that holds for real applications.
Best,
Peter
user list to get some input from them. The
proposal draft is here:
https://github.com/jgrivolla/coling2014-nlp-framework-workshop/blob/master/proposal.md
-- Jens
On 19/12/13 13:29, Jens Grivolla wrote:
On 19/12/13 13:08, Peter Klügl wrote:
Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
Ok
Am 19.12.2013 12:31, schrieb Jens Grivolla:
Ok, it's time to seriously get started on this.
I guess we can start with the GSCL workshop description, and maybe
make it more inclusive for other frameworks (GATE, etc.)
We need a couple of organizers (me, Renaud, ...?) and a potential PC
ALL matches on all annotations and also on the SPECIAL annotations until
the end of the document. Then, there is no SPECIAL annotation left to
match and the rule fails.
May I use your examples in a junit test case?
Best,
Peter
Am 17.12.2013 17:45, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Thanks, I will take
Hi,
the problem with the rules throwing an exception is now fixed in the
current trunk. Thanks for reporting it.
Best,
Peter
Am 13.12.2013 16:37, schrieb Joerg Poecher:
Hello,
I would like to report some issues that occurred while testing the Ruta
Workbench.
There seems to be
Am 17.12.2013 18:14, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
On 2013-12-17 12:10, Peter Klügl wrote:
Am 17.12.2013 18:00, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
On 2013-12-17 11:56, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
some of the rules behave as expected. It's maybe a bit
counterintuitive,
but I do not see a way to improve it. I
Am 05.12.2013 16:44, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
On 2013-12-04 12:33, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
I'm highly interested in ruta, and its potential applications in
industrial
applications. Right know I'm trying to create a simple toy condition
extension that is simply a case insensitive INLIST
Hi,
Am 04.12.2013 18:33, schrieb Sebastian:
Hi,
I'm highly interested in ruta, and its potential applications in industrial
applications. Right know I'm trying to create a simple toy condition
extension that is simply a case insensitive INLIST condition. It is
completely based on the
Sorry, I read over the mention that it is only a toy extension... so
maybe ignore the advice with the actions ;-)
Can you check whether there is a Type in the typesystem with the short
name MonthsList?
Best,
Peter
Am 05.12.2013 09:58, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi,
Am 04.12.2013 18:33, schrieb
Am 05.12.2013 14:43, schrieb Sebastian:
Peter Klügl pkluegl@... writes:
Hi,
Am 04.12.2013 18:33, schrieb Sebastian:
Hi,
I'm highly interested in ruta, and its potential applications in
industrial
applications. Right know I'm trying to create a simple toy condition
extension
On 27.11.2013 21:39, Matthias Grabmair wrote:
Hi all,
I am relatively new to UIMA and am involved in a project where an annotated
corpus needs to be developed.
My TypeSystem.xml imports org.cleartk.TypeSystem, which
works fine for TypeSystem editing purposes.
However, I cannot edit a
I also think that it is a good idea if we can expect enough submissions.
However, I will not be able to organize it and cannot promise to submit
something.
Peter
On 21.10.2013 11:44, Jens Grivolla wrote:
Hi, at GSCL 2013 we talked a bit about options for the next UIMA
workshop. How about
Hi,
the slides of the GSCL tutorial part II about UIMA Ruta are now
available online:
http://uima.apache.org/downloads/gscl2013/2013-GSCL-Ruta.pdf
Best,
Peter
Hallo,
ich würde das 1-2 Wochen online lassen, aber dann mindesten ein paar
Ruta Projekte rausnehmen. Ich will das nicht so lange online lassen, vor
allem nicht ohne notice and license usw.
Wär das OK für dich?
Gruß,
Peter
On 26.09.2013 07:17, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
We put the
Hi,
Am 22.09.2013 15:43, schrieb Anton Hughes:
Hi
I am trying to learn Uima Ruta, and while the documentation is very good, it
would be very helpful if I had an example eclipse project.
Does anyone have a sample project they can share with me?
The trunk and the source release of UIMA Ruta
Hi,
the wildcard # has some bugs in ruta 2.0.1, which have been fixed in
ruta-2.1.0.
It's hard to determine what the problem is. I created a small test set
in ruta-2.1.0 and tested the rule. No problems observed. You might want
to switch to ruta-2.1.0. There is a release candidate with an update
-to-date)
http://childrenshospital.org/cfapps/research/data_admin/Site3240/mainpageS3240P0.html
### Organizers and Contact ###
Peter Klügl, Universität Würzburg
Richard Eckart de Castilho, TU Darmstadt
Katrin Tomanek, Averbis GmbH
Please address any inquiries regarding the workshop
On 28.08.2013 16:52, Alexandre Patry wrote:
Hi,
I use RUTA and I want to delete an annotation if it is within the
first 50 tokens of a document. I came up with the following rules :
ANY{POSITION(Document, 1)- Header};// Annotate the
first token in the document
On 28.08.2013 18:17, Alexandre Patry wrote:
On 2013-08-28 11:25, Peter Klügl wrote:
On 28.08.2013 16:52, Alexandre Patry wrote:
Hi,
I use RUTA and I want to delete an annotation if it is within the
first 50 tokens of a document. I came up with the following rules :
ANY{POSITION
Am 28.08.2013 20:33, schrieb Alexandre Patry:
On 2013-08-28 12:19, Peter Klügl wrote:
On 28.08.2013 18:17, Alexandre Patry wrote:
I will be happy to test drive MARKFIRST when it will be in trunk.
It's already in the trunk. If you want, then I can also think of
something that avoid
Hi,
I have not yet used Kepler myself. I will take a look.
Best,
Peter
On 25.07.2013 10:23, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi,
Ruta Workbench 2.0.1 can not be installed on Eclipse Kepler because
the dependecy to DLTK are not matched. Any ideas?
Armin
in Darmstadt in conjunction with GSCL 2013
### Organizers and Contact ###
Peter Klügl, Universität Würzburg
Richard Eckart de Castilho, TU Darmstadt
Katrin Tomanek, Averbis GmbH
Please address any inquiries regarding the workshop to:
uima.gscl2...@gmail.com
### Program Committee
/conferences/?conf=uimagscl2013
### Important Dates ###
July, 12:Submission deadline
August, 16: Notification of acceptance
August, 31: Camera-ready deadline
Sept, 23:Workshop held in Darmstadt in conjunction with GSCL 2013
### Organizers and Contact ###
Peter Klügl, Universität
Hi,
On 26.06.2013 09:33, Fouad HAMDI wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the Tika Annotator within RUTA scripts.
Here is my current script:
PACKAGE test;
ENGINE tika.MarkupAnnotator;
TYPESYSTEM tika.MarkupAnnotationTypeSystem;
DECLARE Link;
Document{- EXEC(MarkupAnnotator,
Hi,
the important part is missing in the documentation. Sorry for that, I
will fix the documentation.
EXEC has another parameter, a list of types, which are internally
reindexed in Ruta. This is necessary for therule inference and
conditions like PARTOF, which would be extremely inefficient
### Important Dates ###
July, 12:Submission deadline
August, 16: Notification of acceptance
August, 31: Camera-ready deadline
Sept, 23:Workshop held in Darmstadt in conjunction with GSCL 2013
### Organizers and Contact ###
Peter Klügl, Universität Würzburg
Richard Eckart de Castilho, TU
The code is of course wrong since the conditions are not part of the
rule. I committed a new version.
Can you please check if there are rules with features in the list
rulesToTest now?
Aren't there any new rules in the prior code?
// first only add conditions, e.g., for features
Can you check if the following code in TextRulerAnnotation (constructor)
is used:
if (consideredFeatures != null) {
for (String string : consideredFeatures) {
Feature feature = afs.getType().getFeatureByBaseName(string);
if (feature != null feature.getRange().isPrimitive())
On 10.06.2013 13:34, Sondes Bannour wrote:
Yes it is called in getTermsWithinBounds(int, int, TextRulerExample) and
getTermsAfter(WhiskRuleItem, TextRulerExample) functions.
and do they actually store features in the map?
Best,
Peter
Best,
Sondes
On 10.06.2013 15:29, Sondes Bannour wrote:
sorry i didn't finish writing when i pushed send. Actually my types are
Lemma (with feature lemma), Term (with features lemma and postag) and
POSTag (with feature postag) and i was learning rules with the feature
lemma only.
And for this:
On 06.06.2013 14:42, Sondes Bannour wrote:
I may not have the right version of Ruta but in the 2.0.1 version the
TextRulerExampleDocument.resetAndFillTestCAS()
function is the same as the one i have. Where can i find the modifications
you added?
They are in the trunk:
On 05.06.2013 15:22, Sondes Bannour wrote:
Hi peter,
Sorry i was a little busy. I think i can't open a jira issue since i
am still working on the TextMarker 1.0 version and not on Ruta
(TextRuler on Ruta doesn't work well). However i sent you in this mail
the original TextRuler project and
Hi,
can you create a patch of your changes and attach it to a (new) jira
issue. If it is OK for you, then I would try to integrate your changes
and investigate that problem. I have taken a look at the whisk
implementation this weekend and the 0/0 problem only occurred for bad
rule anchoring,
the problem without an actual use case.
Can you provide a simple example?
What is your learning configuration?
My first guess would be that Lemma is also a target type. Are there any
exceptions (log file) or errors (error view)?
Best,
Peter
Am 31.05.2013 18:36, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi
Hi,
this should of course not happen at all and can have many different
reasons, most likely in the initialization in TextRuler. I have to take
a look at the implementation and do some testing (will take some time).
Best,
Peter
On 30.05.2013 17:14, Sondes Bannour wrote:
Hello,
I have a
when writing rules. Both
the rule language and the workbench integrate
smoothly with Apache UIMA.
More information about UIMA Ruta can be found here:
http://uima.apache.org/ruta.html
- Peter Klügl, for the Apache UIMA development team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32
://tmwiki.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/. A more detailed description
would be appreciated.
This wiki refers to the old version hosted at sourceforge and should not
be referred to.
Best,
Peter
Thanks,
Armin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de
Hi,
On 23.05.2013 13:30, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
On 23.05.2013 13:09, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi!
In Ruta 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT, rules with an optional first element do not work.
The optional part seems to be mandatory. Using
DECLARE Test;
a? b c{-MARK(Test, 1, 3)};
I just wanted
Hi,
On 23.05.2013 13:49, Sondes Bannour wrote:
Hi,
I tried the textruler view (whisk (token) ) under Ruta 2.0.2 and i got
weard results like rules with p=0 and n=0 while i fixed the maximum error
threshold to 0.1. Whisk (generic) doesn't even work for me (it seems like
crashing on the first
dynamic anchoring in order to change the
matching direction. Here, the rules do not start with the first element,
but choose the optimal element by a simple heuristic.
Best,
Peter
On 23.05.2013 13:30, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
On 23.05.2013 13:09, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi!
In Ruta 2.0.2
, replacing the plugins might help.
Best,
Peter
On 22.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi Peter,
the eclipse update site does not work. Eclipse does not recognize it as an
udpate site.
Cheers,
Armin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni
,
Armin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Mai 2013 19:58
An: user@uima.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ruta - MARKFAST
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 15:49, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hello!
Is there any possibility to match
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 09:18, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi!
I've checkout Ruta 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT with
svn checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/ruta/trunk
and build it succesfully with
mvn clean install.
Now, how to install the Eclipse plugins? Is there a local reposity
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 12:47, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi,
In Ruta 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT a token with begin offset 0 and end offset 2 comes
before a token with begin offset 0 and end offset 0. The token order is not
as I expected. Thus in my case, SourceDocumentAnnotation was the second token
On 20.05.2013 23:01, GATE User wrote:
Thanks Richard and Peter:
What I want to be able to do is, when the xml is returned, a program should
then be able to find the corrected message and use that for future
operations. Will using views allow this? Is it simply easier to just make a
new
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 13:52, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 13:49, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi Peter,
I think that the rule doesn't matter. But I tried to find calender dates. To
find out what was going wrong I reduced the original more complex rule to
DECLARE Date;
Document
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 15:49, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hello!
Is there any possibility to match strings like
nC.
v. Chr.
with MARKFAST?
Yes. Did you observe any problems? I just tested it with:
Wordlist:
nC.
v. Chr.
Input document:
nC.
v. Chr.
n C .
v . Chr.
Script:
PACKAGE
Hi,
UIMA Ruta (originally released as UIMA TextMarker) provides
functionality for modifications in the document (in a new view) and for
transforming the offsets of the annotations when the document is
changed. However, both are not yet linked.
There is a short introduction in modification
Hi,
sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.
The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an
exception.
Best,
Peter
On 17.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hello!
Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{-MARK(F, 1, 4)} works.
A (B)? C
Hi,
the problem should be fixed now.
Best,
Peter
On 17.05.2013 12:53, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP.
The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an
exception.
Best,
Peter
On 17.05.2013 12:34, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote
Hi,
feature assignments for simple regexp rules are now part of the trunk.
RegExpRuleTest.ruta contains an example and the documentation describes
the exact syntax.
Best,
Peter
On 08.05.2013 17:56, William Karl Thompson wrote:
Many thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Peter Klügl
Hi,
no, there is no direct negative match support (actually, there has been
one, but it was removed).
What you can do is just use the positive matches with additional
conditions, e.g., something like:
Person ANY{-STARTSWITH(Org)}; // additional rule element
Person{-NEAR(Org, 0, 4, true)}; //
(RutaLauncher.java:149)
at
org.apache.uima.ruta.ide.launching.RutaLauncher.main(RutaLauncher.java:119)
Cheers,
Armin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Mai 2013 10:56
An: user@uima.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW
just failed.
Best,
Peter
On 06.05.2013 07:53, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi Peter,
That is fine. I'm using 2.0.0 core jar from maven central. Can you give me a
snapshot update site, please?
Thank you,
Armin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni
Hi,
I should have mentioned that you can update your old textmarker projects
to new UIMA Ruta project with a context action: right-click on an old
project and select UIMA Ruta - Update Project
Best,
Peter
On 06.05.2013 10:56, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
a snapshot update site is here:
http
Hi,
On 03.05.2013 13:52, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Textmarker on a CAS XMI file with a lot of annotations from
different annotators and different type systems. There are some type names
used more than once, but with different name spaces. All types are defined in
Hi,
it's fixed now in the trunk.
Which version do you use? Just let me know if you need a snapshot update
site or help with the new projects.
Best,
Peter
On 03.05.2013 14:28, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
On 03.05.2013 13:52, armin.weg...@bka.bund.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Textmarker on a CAS
26, 2013 3:40 PM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: RE: Extending TextMarker with new actions
Hi Peter,
Thanks very much, I will try this out!
Best,
Will
-Original Message-
From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:30 AM
To: user
://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/regex/Matcher.html#find()
Anyway, thanks again for your help getting this all working.
Cheers,
Will
From: Peter Klügl [pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 4:20 PM
To: user@uima.apache.org
)
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 12:14 PM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extending TextMarker with new actions
Hi,
oh, I am afraid I recently added something like that for the 2.0.1 release, not
yet included
Hi,
Am 01.05.2013 04:57, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
Hi,
I'm working with the cTAKES pipeline to annotate some clinical text. The cTAKES
syntactic chunker generates overlapping and nested annotations with the same
syntactic type. For example:
[NP ascending [NP colon polyps]]
What I
Hi,
Am 29.04.2013 17:16, schrieb armin.weg...@bka.bund.de:
Hi!
The CAS editor and Textmarker are some fine Eclipse plugins to view the
results. But I haven't yet managed to build a type system which works in java
code and in the editors? There's always something wrong with the paths, either
-
From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:30 AM
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Extending TextMarker with new actions
Hi,
On 25.04.2013 19:16, William Karl Thompson wrote:
Hi Peter,
Many thanks! I was just about to try it out before reading
in the same sentence). The current cTAKES relation
extractor is based on machine learning, and requires an annotated corpus for
training, whereas sometimes it's just easier to create a set of rules.
Cheers,
Will
-Original Message-
From: Peter Klügl [mailto:pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de]
Sent
Hi,
Am 25.04.2013 03:29, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
Hello,
(My apologies, I mistakenly sent this to the dev list initially)
I'm very interested in using the TextMarker project, but the current set of
action types doesn't quite do what I need. I found references to an extension
Hi,
I checked the language extensions and unfortunately they do not work
right now. There are some small bugs, but they will be fixed tomorrow.
Best,
Peter
Am 25.04.2013 11:37, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hi,
Am 25.04.2013 03:29, schrieb William Karl Thompson:
Hello,
(My apologies, I
Hi,
we are currently looking for a new name for the Apache UIMA TextMarker
system (language and workbench) and invite the UIMA comunity to vote for
a name.
This is not a formal vote. The vote should be cast for one of the
following options, but is not limited to those.
Option 1:
name:
Hi,
Am 05.04.2013 09:23, schrieb Laurent Audibert:
Hi all and thanks for the good job on TextMarker.
I would like to write a rule using a disjunction on the type match
rather than annotation within a given type.
For example, I would like to factorise two rules like :
Token{REGEXP(human)}
Hi,
sorry for this beginner question:
It there a shortcut to apply a sofa-unaware AE on CAS view that is not
the _InitialView?
It seems quite cumbersome to programmatically generate an aggregate
analysis engine description to wrap to sofa-unaware engine.
Best,
Peter
Hi Peter,
there are two parts: the analysis engine and the Workbench.
The TextMarker analysis engine is not sofa-aware. You should be able
to use the sofa mapping [1] in an aggregate analysis engine for
assigning any view to the _initialView of the TextMarker analysis engine.
The TextMarker
the TextMarker rule language and the TextMarker Workbench integrate
smoothly with Apache UIMA.
This is the first release. More information about UIMA TextMarker can be
found here:
http://uima.apache.org/textmarker.html
- Peter Klügl, for the Apache UIMA development team
signature.asc
Description
Hi,
thanks for the pointer. I will attend this problem.
I already prepared information about building TextMarker, but I am still
thinking about the best location to publish it.
After uimaFIT has arrived at Apache UIMA, I will also take care that
TextMarker will work together with uimaFIT more
Hi,
No, you are completely right and that should work just fine.
Normally, if something like this happens, then it is caused by the
filtering setting. Have you checked if the head rule of the block
(Sentence) tries to match on all sentences? Just debug the script in the
Workbench, open the
I can see only one attached file: TextSimplifier.xml
Can you send me the input file, the rules and the type systems.
Peter
On 19.11.2012 13:45, Monaghan, Fergal wrote:
I've attached here the descriptor (TextSimplifier.xml: configuration
for TextMarkerEngine), the test input data
{ - MATCHEDTEXT(anchorString)};
RCHead{ - REPLACE( + tailString + + anchorString)};
RCBodyEnd{ - REPLACE(.)};
Tail{ - DEL};
}
Document{ - EXEC(Modifier)};
On 19.11.2012 18:10, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi Fergal,
I played a bit around and attached the resulting TextMarker project.
The first part
Roberto Franchini:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Peter Klügl pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
Without going in an in-depth comparison : Behemoth (
https://github.com/DigitalPebble/behemoth) can be used to deploy your UIMA
or GATE pipelines over a Hadoop cluster so both tools are on an equal
footing
Without going in an in-depth comparison : Behemoth (
https://github.com/DigitalPebble/behemoth) can be used to deploy your UIMA
or GATE pipelines over a Hadoop cluster so both tools are on an equal
footing from that point of view. UIMA-AS can be used for non-batch,
low-latency processing, there
and AnnotationFS
has been imported.
Any ideas/suggestions would be appreciated?
Thanks,
Alan
--
-
Dipl.-Inf. Peter Klügl
Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-86741
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
. :)
--
-
Dipl.-Inf. Peter Klügl
Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-86741
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
97074 Würzburg mail: pklu...@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http
Hi,
the CAS Editor already supports this, as far as I know.
If you open a xmiCAS and right-click on the editor, then there is an
option to select the view. That should work, but I haven't used it
myself yet.
Regards,
Peter
Am 29.12.2011 09:42, schrieb armin.weg...@bka.bund.de:
Hello!
Is
--
-
Dipl.-Inf. Peter Klügl
Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-86741
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
97074 Würzburg mail: pklu...@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http://www.is.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
with
an external definition, for example with a style map?
Peter
Am 25.01.2011 13:15, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Hello,
how can I open a xmiCAS that's not in a corpus folder? I'm using the
version of the current update site. Is this functionality aldready
included there or not until the next
Hello,
I think (not sure though) that you can somehow open an XMI
file with data that's not in the type system, and populate
the CAS only with the known data without throwing an error.
--Thilo
Yes, that's what I'm normally doing. If you just create a new CAS with a
given type system and
--
-
Dipl.-Inf. Peter Klügl
Universität WürzburgTel.: +49-(0)931-31-86741
Am Hubland Fax.: +49-(0)931-31-86732
97074 Würzburg mail: pklu...@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http://www.is.informatik.uni
301 - 394 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
