Re: [ClusterLabs] SLES12 SP4: update_cib_stonith_devices_v2 nonsense "Watchdog will be used via SBD if fencing is required"

2019-10-23 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 15:53 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 23.10.2019 13:35, Ulrich Windl пишет: > > Hi! > > > > In SLES12 SP4 I'm kind of annoyed due to repeating messages > > "unpack_config:Watchdog will be used via SBD if fencing is > > required". It is annoying, but it's a side effect

[ClusterLabs] fence-agents v4.5.2

2019-10-23 Thread Oyvind Albrigtsen
ClusterLabs is happy to announce fence-agents v4.5.2, which is a bugfix release for v4.5.1. The source code is available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents/releases/tag/v4.5.2 The most significant enhancements in this release are: - bugfixes and enhancements: - fence_compute:

Re: [ClusterLabs] SLES12 SP4: update_cib_stonith_devices_v2 nonsense "Watchdog will be used via SBD if fencing is required"

2019-10-23 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
23.10.2019 13:35, Ulrich Windl пишет: > Hi! > > In SLES12 SP4 I'm kind of annoyed due to repeating messages "unpack_config: > Watchdog will be used via SBD if fencing is required". > > While examining another problem, I found this sequence: > * Some unrelated resource was moved (migrated) >

[ClusterLabs] SLES12 SP4: update_cib_stonith_devices_v2 nonsense "Watchdog will be used via SBD if fencing is required"

2019-10-23 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! In SLES12 SP4 I'm kind of annoyed due to repeating messages "unpack_config: Watchdog will be used via SBD if fencing is required". While examining another problem, I found this sequence: * Some unrelated resource was moved (migrated) * stonith-ng: info: update_cib_stonith_devices_v2:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Safe way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a two node cluster

2019-10-23 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
21.10.2019 9:39, Ulrich Windl пишет: "Dileep V Nair" schrieb am 20.10.2019 um 17:54 in > Nachricht > > m>: > >> Hi, >> >> I am confused about the best way to stop pacemaker on both nodes of a >> two node cluster. The options I know of are >> 1. Put the cluster in Maintenance Mode,

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM in the cluster can tolerate more than one node failure at the same time?

2019-10-23 Thread Gang He
Hi Christine, Thank for your explanation. Originally, there is concurrent fence feature in Pacemaker, you clear my doubt :-) Thanks Gang > -Original Message- > From: Users [mailto:users-boun...@clusterlabs.org] On Behalf Of christine > caulfield > Sent: 2019年10月23日 15:09 > To:

[ClusterLabs] resource-agents v4.4.0

2019-10-23 Thread Oyvind Albrigtsen
ClusterLabs is happy to announce resource-agents v4.4.0. Source code is available at: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/releases/tag/v4.4.0 The most significant enhancements in this release are: - bugfixes and enhancements: - NodeUtilization: fix Xen detection and improve logging

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM in the cluster can tolerate more than one node failure at the same time?

2019-10-23 Thread christine caulfield
On 22/10/2019 07:15, Gang He wrote: Hi List, I remember that master node has the full copy for one DLM lock resource and the other nodes have their own lock status, then if one node is failed(or fenced), the DLM lock status can be recovered from the remained node quickly. My question is, if