>>> Sebastien BASTARD schrieb am 22.02.2022 um 17:54 in
Nachricht
:
> Hello Strahil,
>
> I don't have pcs software (corosync is embedded in proxmox), but I have
> "pvecm status" :
I wonder: Doesn't proxmox have its own support?
___
Manage your
>>> Sebastien BASTARD schrieb am 22.02.2022 um 14:55 in
Nachricht
:
> Hello Strahil,
>
> I didn't know that there are different kinds of fencing. Where can I find
> this information ?
>
Good question:
When I tried "crm configure show fencing_topology", the only output was
"fencing_topology"
>>> Sebastien BASTARD schrieb am 22.02.2022 um 14:02 in
Nachricht
:
...
> Strangely, the clocks of the 3 computers are the same but, each time, the
> time of Qdevice is less than 1 hour than ServerA or ServerB.
Maybe check the timezone. The date output by my script is UTC by intention.
The main
Strangely I can't see any timeouts set in at the example in
https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Fencing ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 18:54, Sebastien BASTARD
wrote: Hello Strahil,
I don't have pcs software (corosync is embedded in proxmox), but I have "pvecm
Hello Strahil,
I don't have pcs software (corosync is embedded in proxmox), but I have
"pvecm status" :
Cluster information
---
Name: cluster
Config Version: 24
Transport:knet
Secure auth: on
Quorum information
--
Date: Tue
fencing is the reboot mechanism
pcs status
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 16:44, Sebastien BASTARD
wrote: Hello Strahil,
As I don't know the kind of fencing, here is the current configuration of
corosync :
logging {
debug: off
to_syslog: yes}
nodelist {
node
Hello Strahil,
As I don't know the kind of fencing, here is the current configuration of
corosync :
logging {
debug: off
to_syslog: yes
}
nodelist {
node {
name: serverA
nodeid: 1
quorum_votes: 1
ring0_addr: xx.xx.xx.xx
}
node {
name: serverB
nodeid: 3
Hello Strahil,
I didn't know that there are different kinds of fencing. Where can I find
this information ?
Best regards.
Le mar. 22 févr. 2022 à 14:29, Strahil Nikolov a
écrit :
> What kind of fencing are you using ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 15:24,
What kind of fencing are you using ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 15:24, Sebastien BASTARD
wrote: Hello Strahil Nikolov,
Qdevice is not a vm. It is a Linux Debian, physical server.
Best regards.
Le mar. 22 févr. 2022 à 14:20, Strahil Nikolov a écrit :
Is the
Hello Strahil Nikolov,
Qdevice is not a vm. It is a Linux Debian, physical server.
Best regards.
Le mar. 22 févr. 2022 à 14:20, Strahil Nikolov a
écrit :
> Is the qdevice on a VM ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 15:03, Sebastien BASTARD
> wrote:
>
Is the qdevice on a VM ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 15:03, Sebastien BASTARD
wrote: ___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
Hello Ulrich, Hello team,
This night the servers of the cluster restarted together twice ( 08h17m07 &
08h50m04 22/02/2022 for server A, 08h16m32 & 08h49m43 22/02/2022 for server
B ).
Here is the result of the up/down test :
*ServerA :*
*Log of Qdevice from ServerA :*
- None
*Log of
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:25:15 +0100
Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
> ...
> >Ping Oyvind, maybe you have some input about this as the resource-agents
> >package maintainer?
> I dont know how it got excluded on CentOS Stream only, but I've
> created a bz to fix it:
>
On 22/02/22 11:59 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:27:16 +
lejeczek via Users wrote:
...
Perhaps as the author(s) you can chip in and/or help via comments to
rectify this:
...
Problem: package resource-agents-paf-4.9.0-7.el8.x86_64 requires
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 18.02.2022
>>> um
16:00 in Nachricht
<690471172.924067.1645196400218.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
>
> - On Feb 17, 2022, at 4:25 PM, kgaillot kgail...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> So for me the big question is:
>>> When a transition is happening, and
Hello,
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:27:16 +
lejeczek via Users wrote:
> ...
> Perhaps as the author(s) you can chip in and/or help via comments to
> rectify this:
>
> ...
>
> Problem: package resource-agents-paf-4.9.0-7.el8.x86_64 requires
PAF doesn't share the same release plans than the
On 21/02/2022 16:01, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:04:27 +
CHAMPAGNE Julie wrote:
...
The last release is 2 years old, is it still in development?
There's no activity because there's not much to do on it. PAF is mainly in
maintenance (bug fix) mode.
I have few
17 matches
Mail list logo
