On 06/22/2016 04:29 PM, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 11:17 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> I'm thinking about active/active. But i think active/passive with a
>> non-cluster fs is less complicated.
> But you will need something to control DRBD - especially in the
> active/passive-case.
>
On 06/22/2016 11:17 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Dimitri Maziuk
> Datum: 22.06.2016 21:23 (GMT+01:00)
> An: users@clusterlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD
>
> On 06/22/2016 02:13 PM, Lentes, Bernd
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Dimitri Maziuk
Datum: 22.06.2016 21:23 (GMT+01:00)
An: users@clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] design question to DRBD
On 06/22/2016 02:13 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about starting drbd and
On 06/22/2016 02:13 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> I'm thinking about starting drbd and the ocfs fs by init. I don't see the
> strong need having it controlled by pacemaker.
> But of course the mix is more difficult to maintain.
Are you going to use active-active drbd with a cluster filesystem?
- On Jun 22, 2016, at 8:34 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 01:00 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> - On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:17 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
>> wrote:
>
>>> Does your webapp ever write to /srv/www?
>
>> it does.
>
> Yeah, OK, it
On 06/22/2016 01:00 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> - On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:17 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
>> Does your webapp ever write to /srv/www?
> it does.
Yeah, OK, it that case you want DRBD so the writes go to both nodes at
once.
If you have to use DRBD anyway, then
- On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:17 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 11:28 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
>> yes, that's a good hint. I will not synchronize /usr/lib/perl with DRBD.
>> But for /srv/www it should be fine ?
>
> Does your webapp ever write to /srv/www? If
On 06/22/2016 11:28 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> yes, that's a good hint. I will not synchronize /usr/lib/perl with DRBD.
> But for /srv/www it should be fine ?
Does your webapp ever write to /srv/www? If not I would consider running
two copies of everything with ZFS as a backing store and
- On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Klaus Wenninger kwenn...@redhat.com wrote:
> On 06/22/2016 02:30 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we have a two node cluster. It is running a Web-Application. Web-Application
>> needs a MySQL Database, has static and dynamic (perlscripts) webpages.
>> I
On 06/22/2016 06:46 AM, wd wrote:
> if [ X`uname -s` != "XLinux" ]; then
> ocf_log err "IPaddr2 only supported Linux."
> exit $OCF_ERR_INSTALLED
> fi
>
> Do you run on a linux? what is 'uname -s' command returned?
It could also return "not installed" if
On 22/06/16 08:30 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a two node cluster. It is running a Web-Application. Web-Application
> needs a MySQL Database, has static and dynamic (perlscripts) webpages.
> I will make the DB HA with MySQL replication.
> From time to time it's likely that
Hi,
we have a two node cluster. It is running a Web-Application. Web-Application
needs a MySQL Database, has static and dynamic (perlscripts) webpages.
I will make the DB HA with MySQL replication.
From time to time it's likely that something in the webapp is changed, so we
have to edit some
if [ X`uname -s` != "XLinux" ]; then
ocf_log err "IPaddr2 only supported Linux."
exit $OCF_ERR_INSTALLED
fi
Do you run on a linux? what is 'uname -s' command returned?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Юрченко Станислав
wrote:
> Hello!
> I have
Hello!
I have configured cluster pacemaker + corosync and it's works. Both
nodes are online. But when I starting to addind failover_ip resource
I've faced with this error:
* failover_ip_monitor_0 on debian-drbd1 'not installed' (5): call=5,
status=Not installed, exitreason='none',
14 matches
Mail list logo