Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/5/24 12:11, home user wrote: On 4/5/24 11:34 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: tmpfs    8158696    0   8158696   0% /tmp /dev/sda3 485348   339555    116097  75% /boot This looks like just over 100MB which could possibly cause a problem. It

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread home user
Thank-you, Samuel. On 4/5/24 11:34 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: === -bash.5[~]: df "df -h" is much more pleasant. -bash.1[~]: df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on devtmpfs4.0M 0 4.0M 0% /dev tmpfs 7.8G

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: Good morning, I have a stand-alone 2013 workstation (11 years old).  It's dual-boot; the other OS is windows-7. I'm planning to upgrade from f-38 to f-39 in a few days.  I've had hard drive space issues before.  So I'd like to know how to determine in

planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread home user
Good morning, I have a stand-alone 2013 workstation (11 years old). It's dual-boot; the other OS is windows-7. I'm planning to upgrade from f-38 to f-39 in a few days. I've had hard drive space issues before. So I'd like to know how to determine in advance if I have enough hard drive space

Re: F40: mock fails with (some) explicit paths in BuildRequires:

2024-04-05 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Todd Zullinger writes: > So, can anyone tell me why %{_includedir}/ltdl.h, which is > /usr/include/ltdl.h, got rejected by mock+dnf5, but %{__make}, which is > /usr/bin/make was just peachy? Using file or directory paths in requires is only allowed for /usr/bin /usr/sbin, and /etc, per the