On 4/10/23 09:07, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 28/9/23 20:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 13:14 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
Hi,
Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was
still
mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see
what
I saw
On 28/9/23 20:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 13:14 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
Hi,
Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was
still
mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see
what
I saw between this reply and my signature. It
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 13:14 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was
> still
> mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see
> what
> I saw between this reply and my signature. It starts off with an
> error
>
On 2023-09-23 10:45, steven stern wrote:
I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
I would probably ask that question in this
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 17:36 -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> The problem could be your Evolution. Adam's message seemed just fine
> when I saw it using exmh.
It was mangled on two different versions of Evolution on two different
Linux distros. It could still be an Evolution problem, but it could
also
Hi,
Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was still
mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see what
I saw between this reply and my signature. It starts off with an error
message, and the message has character encoding (and/or decoding)
problems (I
Dave Close wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>> Adam Mercer wrote:
>>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up
>>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39
>>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue...
>>
>>Well, I might disagree. Your
Tim wrote:
> Adam Mercer wrote:
>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up
>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39
>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue...
>
>Well, I might disagree. Your message was extremely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, September 26th, 2023 at 09:09, Tim via users
wrote:
> Well, I might disagree. Your message was extremely scrambled by the
> GPG/PGP process.
>
> What I see is mostly unhandled MIME coming
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 16:31 +, Adam Mercer via users wrote:
> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up for
> F38 wit=
> hout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39 source RPM
> using moc=
> k, and so far it's been running without issue...
Well, I might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, September 24th, 2023 at 06:36, stan via users
wrote:
> If you aren't going to update to F39 when it is released (it's in
> beta), then you could download the src.rpm and build it locally if you
>
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:45:41 -0500
steven stern wrote:
> I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
> been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
>
> https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
Not the package
I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
___
users mailing list --
13 matches
Mail list logo
