Re: planning for upgrade. [SOLVED]

2024-04-07 Thread home user
On 4/7/24 8:50 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: One other thing you might want to do. Change the number of kernels to keep. The default is 3. I have one old IBM R61 that has had lot of updates over the years, and its boot partition was to small. As other suggested removing the rescue

Re: planning for upgrade. [SOLVED]

2024-04-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II via users
max_parallel_downloads=20 fastestmirror=False minrate=128K deltarpm=false On 7 Apr 2024 at 20:33, home user wrote: Date sent: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 20:33:14 -0600 Subject:Re: planning for upgrade. [SOLVED] To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org From: home

Re: planning for upgrade. [SOLVED]

2024-04-07 Thread home user
On 4/7/24 8:20 PM, home user wrote: On 4/7/24 8:11 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/7/24 14:17, home user wrote: On 4/5/24 1:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: Run the following command: echo 'dracut_rescue_image="no"' > /etc/dracut.conf.d/02-rescue.conf Then you can delete the rescue files from /boot and

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-07 Thread home user
On 4/7/24 8:11 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/7/24 14:17, home user wrote: On 4/5/24 1:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: Run the following command: echo 'dracut_rescue_image="no"' > /etc/dracut.conf.d/02-rescue.conf Then you can delete the rescue files from /boot and the rescue file from the loader

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-07 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/7/24 14:17, home user wrote: On 4/5/24 1:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: Run the following command: echo 'dracut_rescue_image="no"' > /etc/dracut.conf.d/02-rescue.conf Then you can delete the rescue files from /boot and the rescue file from the loader entries below there. What is the best

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-07 Thread home user
Thank-you, Samuel. I was severely side-tracked Friday afternoon. I'm ready to resume now. On 4/5/24 1:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/5/24 12:11, home user wrote: On 4/5/24 11:34 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: tmpfs    8158696    0   8158696   0% /tmp

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/5/24 12:11, home user wrote: On 4/5/24 11:34 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: tmpfs    8158696    0   8158696   0% /tmp /dev/sda3 485348   339555    116097  75% /boot This looks like just over 100MB which could possibly cause a problem. It

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread home user
Thank-you, Samuel. On 4/5/24 11:34 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: === -bash.5[~]: df "df -h" is much more pleasant. -bash.1[~]: df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on devtmpfs4.0M 0 4.0M 0% /dev tmpfs 7.8G

Re: planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/5/24 09:09, home user wrote: Good morning, I have a stand-alone 2013 workstation (11 years old).  It's dual-boot; the other OS is windows-7. I'm planning to upgrade from f-38 to f-39 in a few days.  I've had hard drive space issues before.  So I'd like to know how to determine

planning for upgrade.

2024-04-05 Thread home user
Good morning, I have a stand-alone 2013 workstation (11 years old). It's dual-boot; the other OS is windows-7. I'm planning to upgrade from f-38 to f-39 in a few days. I've had hard drive space issues before. So I'd like to know how to determine in advance if I have enough hard drive space