[389-users] Re: 2.x query performance problem

> got newest version from https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base dc565fd > (389-Directory/2.3.2 B2023.073.0958 ) > I can confirm, manageDSAit makes no difference any more in query time, > got etimes with 0,9 sec after import and reindexing (with and without option) > but a little difference to

[389-users] Re: Migration from OpenLDAP to 389 Directory Server Failed

Hi, I forget to add aci to 389-ds. Now, I try it with commands below: 1. sudo dsconf -D 'cn=admin,dc=example,dc=org' ldap://localhost:389 plugin root-dn enable and I get result Enabled plugin 'RootDN Access Control'. 2. sudo ldapmodify -f aci.ldif -x -D 'cn=admin,dc=example,dc=org' -w

[389-users] Re: Migration from OpenLDAP to 389 Directory Server Failed

Yes, you're right. I add sudo and the result run as I expected, it shows content file of ldap.conf. Next step is add access control instructions (aci) and I try it with commands below: 1. sudo dsconf -D 'cn=admin,dc=example,dc=org' ldap://localhost:389 plugin root-dn enable and I get result

[389-users] Re: Migration from OpenLDAP to 389 Directory Server Failed

> On 15 Mar 2023, at 02:32, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > On 3/13/23 10:08 PM, Kresna Satya wrote: >> Hi everyone, currently I would like to move the LDAP tool from OpenLDAP and >> 389 Directory Server. The data and configuration are saved in OpenLDAP and I >> would like to migrate to 389

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

On 14 Mar 2023, at 20:28, murph nj wrote:On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Barry Scott wrote:What do I need to setup to allow mock to build for rhel+epel on Fedora? I'm getting this error: $ mock -r rhel+epel-8-x86_64 --print-root ERROR: /etc/pki/entitlement is not a

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

Barry Scott wrote: >> On 13 Mar 2023, at 20:15, Richard Shaw wrote: >> Does it have to be RHEL? I've used Alma and Rocky with success. > > Good question. > > If I build for Alma or Rocky will it install on RHEL, > Centos, Oracle Linux etc? > > I picked RHEL as all the others aim to be ABI

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Barry Scott > wrote: > >> What do I need to setup to allow mock to build for rhel+epel on Fedora? >> >> I'm getting this error: >> >> $ mock -r rhel+epel-8-x86_64 --print-root >> ERROR: /etc/pki/entitlement is not a directory is subscription-manager >>

Re: What is needed to mock build for rhel+epel on Fedora?

> On 13 Mar 2023, at 20:15, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Barry Scott > wrote: >> What do I need to setup to allow mock to build for rhel+epel on Fedora? >> >> I'm getting this error: >> >> $ mock -r rhel+epel-8-x86_64 --print-root

[389-users] Re: 2.x query performance problem

Hi Class, Indeed the same task is much faster (28 times) in 1.4.4 [14/Mar/2023:18:57:58.984319394 +0100] conn=4 op=1 SRCH base="dc=example,dc=com" scope=2 filter="(uniqueMember=uid=group_entry1-0001,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com)" attrs="distinguishedName" [14/Mar/2023:18:57:59.010935256

Re: is cockpit able to handle btrfs mirror's ?

> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, at 1:57 PM, old sixpack13 wrote: > > This is expected behavior right now (certainly not expected by a reasonable > user) from a ... Thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: is cockpit able to handle btrfs mirror's ?

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, at 1:57 PM, old sixpack13 wrote: > more to read: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/MNAGV2XFQOLXQAXGP2CBHOQRGVYDXD2O/ This is expected behavior right now (certainly not expected by a reasonable user) from a development

[389-users] Re: 2.x query performance problem

Hi Claas, Good, that means that the 2x manageDSAit is now fixed. I tried to reproduce locally (2.x) and I think I succeeded: [14/Mar/2023:16:45:54.283507824 +0100] conn=1 op=1 SRCH base="dc=example,dc=com" scope=2 filter="(uniqueMember=uid=group_entry1-0001,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com)"

[389-users] Re: Migration from OpenLDAP to 389 Directory Server Failed

On 3/13/23 10:08 PM, Kresna Satya wrote: Hi everyone, currently I would like to move the LDAP tool from OpenLDAP and 389 Directory Server. The data and configuration are saved in OpenLDAP and I would like to migrate to 389 Directory Server. So far, migration runs well but after migration I

[389-users] Re: 2.x query performance problem

Hallo Thierry,   got newest version from https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base dc565fd (389-Directory/2.3.2 B2023.073.0958 ) I can confirm, manageDSAit makes no difference any more in query time, got etimes with 0,9 sec after import and reindexing (with and without option)   but a little