On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:03:30 +0200
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
it will just be unsafe to restore it, correct way to upgrade is with
rpms if installed that way, missing latest spamassassin, make a bug
on your distro
There are multiple ways to handle it :-)
Pat wants the
On 6/1/11 8:43 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
See, this is why I really shouldn't be left alone in front of a keyboard.
My perl installation is 5.12.3, NOT 5.3.12. Sigh...
On 01.06.11 08:47, Michael Scheidell wrote:
it should be 'safe' to backup the ../site_perl* and ../lib/perl5*
libraries, and
On 6/2/2011 3:29 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 6/1/11 8:43 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
See, this is why I really shouldn't be left alone in front of a keyboard.
My perl installation is 5.12.3, NOT 5.3.12. Sigh...
On 01.06.11 08:47, Michael Scheidell wrote:
it should be 'safe' to backup the
Hi!
I usually install several versions of SA on the same machine without any
trouble.
Fo instance, to test 3.3.2-rc2 I used this procedure
1 wget
http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.2-rc2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.2-rc2.tar.gz
2 wget -q
Here's my situation: I lease a host from a provider. They initially
did all my setup, and I do the simple maintenance I need. A short time
ago, the spam increased dramatically. Others on this list reported it,
and a common suggested problem was that the installed Spamassassin was
badly out of
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
Pat Traynor p...@ssih.com wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to install an alternate version of
Spamassassin and verify that it's working properly before burning my
bridge on the outdated (but working) version I've currently got
installed.
It
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
It possible.
But this, of course, depends on your skills.
For example, if you ever need a newer Perl library/module, you will also
need to install it.
My perl installation is at the latest version as of about a month ago
(5.3.12), and I'm
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
Pat Traynor p...@ssih.com wrote:
Why wont you try on a Virtual machine first?
Install the old Fedora and try it out.
Well, THAT is probably well beyond my capabilities - getting a server
completely installed to the point of it accepting outside
On 6/1/11 7:37 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
My perl installation is at the latest version as of about a month ago
(5.3.12), and I'm comfortable installing modules.
I believe for current versions of SA, the minimum perl is 5.8.8
and, the modules, especially the sha and crypt modules need to be
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/1/11 7:37 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
My perl installation is at the latest version as of about a month ago
(5.3.12), and I'm comfortable installing modules.
I believe for current versions of SA, the minimum perl is 5.8.8
See, this is why I
On 6/1/11 8:43 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
See, this is why I really shouldn't be left alone in front of a keyboard.
My perl installation is 5.12.3, NOT 5.3.12. Sigh...
it should be 'safe' to backup the ../site_perl* and ../lib/perl5*
libraries, and try to upgrade the perl modules first. newer
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/1/11 8:43 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
See, this is why I really shouldn't be left alone in front of a keyboard.
My perl installation is 5.12.3, NOT 5.3.12. Sigh...
it should be 'safe' to backup the ../site_perl* and ../lib/perl5* libraries,
and
On 6/1/2011 7:22 AM, Pat Traynor wrote:
Here's my situation: I lease a host from a provider. They initially
did all my setup, and I do the simple maintenance I need. A short time
ago, the spam increased dramatically. Others on this list reported it,
and a common suggested problem was that
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:47:28 -0400, Michael Scheidell
michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote:
it should be 'safe' to backup the ../site_perl* and ../lib/perl5*
libraries, and try to upgrade the perl modules first. newer pm's SHOULD
work with old SA.
it will just be unsafe to restore it, correct way
14 matches
Mail list logo
