Thx for help, but this doesn't sort it out.
A tried:
code
...
protected void init() {
getRequestCycleSettings().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
super.init();
}
...
/code
and also
code
...
protected void init() {
Of course:)
This goes wrong:
What I would like from below was for it to replace the PhoneSearchPanel
with the next step (gotoPage)
Now I have to use panel since im using the tabs from extension,
originally I created this with pages..
I've though of having a container(which also would be a
look at the wiki?
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicketstuff-scriptaculous
anita nichols wrote:
I download the jar, but how do I use script.aculo.us on wicket?
Thanks,
Anita
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi, being new to wicket I may be completely wrong about this but my thoughts
are these.
It cannot be done. When constructing a form in wicket, the action attribute
value contains
the url to the destination page including the wicket component navigation
information, i.e.
On 8/7/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in 1.2 you cannot call error/info/etc from component's constructor because
you havent added that component to the page yet. in 1.3 it just works.
Indeed.
I was under the false impression that this function worked on regular
deployment, but the
Matej Knopp matej.knopp at gmail.com writes:
Yeah, ResourceReference is like global resource factory. That is for
resources that don't belong to any component/page (they can't touch
any component instance while they are served).
However, I don't understand why we should not just use static
I think it has more to do with the resource URL generation. The
ResourceReference registers itself with application (using the Scope
and name parameters). Then the application uses those information to
generate resource reference url and looks up the resource reference on
request.
While regular
Now you are outside my area of expertise :-). I hope that Ate or Janne
is reading this.
Martijn
On 8/8/07, Miso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx for help, but this doesn't sort it out.
A tried:
code
...
protected void init() {
Also, make sure you are using the code from the experimental portlet
branch, as that is the only part where the portlet support is built
into (seeing you are using wicket 1.3 based code).
Martijn
On 8/8/07, Miso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx for help, but this doesn't sort it out.
A tried:
Yes, I'm using this experimental portlet branch.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12051724
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Me too :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-portlets-on-LIferay-tf4231110.html#a12051726
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi *,
i'm new to the group and hope to find some answers here :-).
I checked the examples and i got the idea to add a simple rendered
yui calendar instance to a webpage.
I don't want to add a datetextfield and then click the button beside it.
Is this possible? And if so how?
Thanks for your
I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
questions it considers dumb. (or related to a library rather than core
wicket) So with the idea that I might have asked a few dumb things,
and to show that I'm trying to resolve things on my own, I'm going to
give my answers to
i used to use the code below, but now i see eelco has removed
AbstractCalendar :( so maybe he can tell us how we can accomplish it now
package com.tbs.webapp.component;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.Map;
import org.apache.wicket.extensions.yui.calendar.AbstractCalendar;
import
i was looking for AbstractCalendar too...
hm, maybe we could use this as an opportunity to provide an all around YUI
Calendar integration with features like a standalone calendar, multiple
calendars, calendars that open when a specific event occurs (eg. focus of
textfield or click on an image).
On 8/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i used to use the code below, but now i see eelco has removed
AbstractCalendar :(
Sorry. I put it back. The problem is that it isn't maintained well, as
all the effort so far has been around the date picker. And since the
datepicker is a
On 8/8/07, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was looking for AbstractCalendar too...
hm, maybe we could use this as an opportunity to provide an all around YUI
Calendar integration with features like a standalone calendar, multiple
calendars, calendars that open when a specific event
can you not factor out the common thing into an abstract behavior and have
abstractcalendar add that abstract behavior to itself and bridge config
methods through itself?
-igor
On 8/8/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i used to
I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
questions it considers dumb.
I think it's more a matter of us being incredibly busy :)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 8/8/07, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting the feeling this list doesn't have a ton of patience for
questions it considers dumb. (or related to a library rather than core
wicket) So with the idea that I might have asked a few dumb things,
and to show that I'm trying to
Q. a. Why isn't this stuff documented in more depth? b. And why don't
people answer every stupid little question I have.
A. a. Wicketstuff-Dojo is still a fairly young project with people who
are currently more into coding it for more functionality than
documenting. You're certainly welcome
On 8/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you not factor out the common thing into an abstract behavior and have
abstractcalendar add that abstract behavior to itself and bridge config
methods through itself?
Possibly. Core of the matter is that we should get rid of the code
On 8/8/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/07, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not the case. what you have to understand is that dojo stuff is a
wicket-stuff project. created and maintained by developers that are not core
developers. so it is really up to those developers to
no they havent. i am not saying that this isnt the place to ask questions, i
am saying dont expect to receive the same quality of service as you receive
when asking questions about the core projects. also not that not everyone on
this list uses that wicket-stuff project, so probably most people
I have a 2 radio buttons that enable a dropdown and a text field
respectively. Thus, depending on which radio button is selected, either the
dropdown or the text field is enabled.
Thus I need ajax capability when a radio button is selected, but evidently
this can't happen in Wicket, because,
I believe this syntax should be forgiving to the user.
A framework should ease life where possible.
What is the benefit of encoding URLs
/param1/value1/param2/value2
over
?param1=value1param2=value2
?
The way it is shown to the users. Not for developers. And not only for
search engine
On 8/8/07, Dariusz Wojtas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to use it in cases where the user may be given feeling that he is
browsing some structure.
well, my point was that structure is probably better represented by indexed
coding strategy, which is forgiving. for example
This looks like it's 1.3, I'm on 1.2.6.
Is it 1.3?
Maybe AjaxEventBehavior(onchange) could help?
It seems to be acting erratic though.
I can get to the onEvent method on on button, but not the other. Have
exactly the same onEvent method set up on both radio buttons (which are
part of a
I guess this was already discussed at some point on the dev list, but I
couldn't find the thread.
I'm just very curious about the motivation of deprecating
RequiredValidator in favour of the setRequired method.
Knowing how clever you devs are, I'm sure there's a good reason, but at
first glace,
the whole refactor started because validators were doing a lot of repeitive
stuff.
for example lets say you have a textfield for a purchase quantity. you add
three validators to it, requred, min1) and checkinventory.
min(1) = { if (input==null) return; int i=typeconvertinput(); if (i1)
error();
if you get duplicate id exception you are probably doing this
populate(Item item) {
Form f=new Form(f);
add(form);
}
instead of the correct way:
populate(Item item) {
Form f=new Form(f);
item.add(f);
}
-igor
On 8/8/07, Mark van Leeuwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a table
Ok, thanks for the explanation, Igor.
Maybe, then, you can tell me if there is a better way of doing what I'm
doing...
I'm working on customising the required messages for each field. For
example, for a contact form, rather than writing:
- A value for field 'Enter your email' is required
- A
Ok, that's much nicer than my way.
Thank you!
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 20:00 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
there are two ways you can do it. if you want total control you can put this
in the .properties of the page with the form
formid.email.Required=Enter your email
afaik they .properties can be attached to any container with associated
markup: so page/panel/border should work
furthermore you can move them up to the application.properties which is a
global file.
-igor
On 8/8/07, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you want total control you can
Sorry Flavio,
I don't have it anymore. The guy who actually did the the port left our
company. I asked him to make a source jar as well, he didn't.
Regards,
Erik.
Flavio schreef:
Hi Erik, me again.
Can you send me the source code?
Thanks,
Flavio.
On 7/30/07, Flavio [EMAIL
35 matches
Mail list logo
