if we ungenerify Link, should we also ungenerify Form? seems like the
exact same kind of usecase.
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a big deal though, either way is fine by me.
I prefer link to be not generified, but either way is fine
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we ungenerify Link, should we also ungenerify Form? seems like the
exact same kind of usecase.
Imho, generic forms make more sense, as you'd typically work on fields
(with formcomponents) of one object (the model object
i think in the filter mapping you will need to add
dispatcherREQUEST/dispatcher
dispatcherERROR/dispatcher
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using Tomcat 5.5.26 with Wicket 1.3.4 and try to show an own error page
when an invalid URL is
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we ungenerify Link, should we also ungenerify Form? seems like the
exact same kind of usecase.
Imho, generic forms make more sense, as you'd
thats my point. you work on fields of one object, true, but it does
not necessarily have to be the form's modelobject unless you use a
compound property model. eg
FormVoid form = new FormVoid(form)
{
protected void onSubmit() { value = dosomethingwith(symbol); }
I still dont see a complete decoupling or do you mean only getDefaultXxxx()?
So all the getModel() (Link/FormComponent) are still there?
For link we could have Link (without model) and ModelLink (generified
and with get/setModel) that would be fine with me.
On 7/2/08, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL
Hi,
i agree that its no big deal, i am just trying to figure out some sort
of guidelines for when we do include the type and when we dont. if we
say that we only include the type when the component uses its model
then neither Link nor Form qualify. in fact neither will ListItem.
only things
thats completely up how you use it
I can think of a lot that dont use models on FormComponents but only on
Forms
If you use CompoundModel then you never will touch or give a FormComponent a
model.
and all your stuff is done on the Model of the Form. (in the onSubmit for
example)
So this can never
Thomas Mäder wrote:
Wicket is a framework to write (mostly) statefulweb pages. Unlike other
web
frameworks it does not impose a particular way to structure the
application
logic beyond that. Think of it like, say, the QT widget set. It's a way to
display information and to be notified
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats my point. you work on fields of one object, true, but it does
not necessarily have to be the form's modelobject unless you use a
compound property model.
The usage of a
Thanks a lot, I use now snapshop #69.
Andrea
2008/6/30, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Apparently the junit tests in wicket 1.3.4 trigger a call to destroy
twice. Since i am setting several fields to null this causes the
second destroy to fail.
As a quick fix i have put some nullchecks
Yes, we have a domain model which talks to stateless backend services.
The controller, i.e. the application flow and event handling is in
the pages. We used to have a different architecture with Spring
Webflow (that was in the dark ages of JSF) as the controller. Since
we're building a single app,
I' need the same feature : replacing a part of the wicket outpout by the
output of an external servlet. Using a InlineFrame is a different feature.
If some body have any idea.
Regards,
Gerald Reinhart
--
View this message in context:
you cant do something like that (dispatch())
Because you shouldnt render to the http response yourself.
What you can do stream the result your self (getting the url) and then add
the content to the wicket WebResponse
johan
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:28 AM, krisNog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
My problem here is that when there is a page error the textfield is not
updated during target.addcomponet call..here is my code snippet:
class MyPage ...
MyPanel mypanel
add(mypanel)
class MyPanel.
TextField amt = new TextField(amt,new PropertyModel(this,amt));
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Matej Knopp wrote:
There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the
project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel,
GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most
Thank you! That did it.
--
Tom
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
i think in the filter mapping you will need to add
dispatcherREQUEST/dispatcher
dispatcherERROR/dispatcher
-igor
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using Tomcat 5.5.26 with Wicket 1.3.4
This is my first post to this mailing-list, so I hope it's not too stupid.
:-)
I'm working on an application using DropDownChoice. Now, to each option it
eventually outputs, I'd like to add the title-tag with some information.
The information should be different for each option tag.
I'm totally
In my current project I have:
10 Forms that use a CompoundPropertymodel and
5 Forms that have no model.
IMHO both Form forms :) should be easy to work with.
Regards,
Erik.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
thats my point. you work on fields of one object, true, but it does
not necessarily have to be
Hi, thanks for your reply. As I said, the troublesome component seems to be a
container which is composed of the following:
ListView author = new
CompoundListView(author)
{
private static
In my current project we try to do everything by BookmarkablePageLinks.
Count:
- 1 Link with an abstractreadonlymodel
- 14 Links without model
- 13 bookmarkablepagelinks without model
- 2 ajaxfallbacklinks without model
in addition we have 4 many used subclasses of bookmarkablepagelink that
do
No, not true.
You /can/ do setResponsePage(new ItemListPage(...)), /and/ make it
bookmarkable. The trick is to call setRedirect(true) together with the
call to setResponsePage. Furthermore you need to mount ItemListPage in
your application#init method (see method Application#mount()).
Indeed. I would very welcome this capability.
Regards,
Erik.
David Leangen wrote:
once again, i dont see what this offers over the hybrid strategy.
Maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong here...
The hybrid stategy is only applied when the target is an
IBookmarkablePageRequestTarget.
the 13 bookmarkable link are not really model things anyway :)
But this discussions just tells us that many people uses things many
different ways.
And that is just a problem to say what is the good way
So i think i am still +1 for a Link and a Generic/ModelLink
johan
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at
Use Select and SelectOption components http://jweekend.co.uk/dev/ArticlesPage/
Maurice
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Søren Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my first post to this mailing-list, so I hope it's not too stupid.
:-)
I'm working on an application using DropDownChoice.
what does it matter how the urls that are inside the html look like?
Its all about how the urls look like in the browsers url bar right?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:59 AM, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
once again, i dont see what this offers over the hybrid strategy.
Maybe you can
However this will not be true if you change the render strategy *imho*
getRequestCycleSettings
().setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.ONE_PASS_RENDER)
+1 for applying the patch as it's not only a matter of correctness but
also of taste
Am 02.07.2008 um 16:06 schrieb Johan
override onerror() and update it there also
-igor
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:08 AM, freak182 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
My problem here is that when there is a page error the textfield is not
updated during target.addcomponet call..here is my code snippet:
class MyPage ...
MyPanel
Yes, I am pretty sure I did this about a month ago.
The funny thing is that we did it this way because this way flash
(component error messages) are preserved. We wanted to show a succes
message on the page we forwarded to.
... looking up the code now...
Yep, correct. Though we did not
Hi,
How can I configure the global size used on the disk by the DiskPageStore
class for all Sessions of the WebApplication ? With the DiskPageStore we can
define the max size of a Session but not the max size for all sessions.
It would useful to know how much space we need in a server to store
Téléphone Ben : 06 14 07 53 63
Le mer 2/07/08 16:56, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Yes, I am pretty sure I did this about a month ago.
The funny thing is that we did it this way because this way flash
(component error messages) are preserved. We wanted to show a succes
Sorry guys, replied to the wrong e-mail ;)
Cheers,
Antoine.
Le mer 2/07/08 17:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Téléphone Ben : 06 14 07 53 63
Le mer 2/07/08 16:56, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Yes, I am pretty sure I did this about a month
ago.
The funny
Can you please elaborate.
I have this Link in my List class
Link itemLink = new Link( itemLink, listItem.getModel() ){
@Override
public void onClick() {
PageParameters parameters = new PageParameters();
parameters.add( ItemId, ((Item)getModelObject()).getId().toString());
what does the url look like?
-igor
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I am pretty sure I did this about a month ago.
The funny thing is that we did it this way because this way flash (component
error messages) are preserved. We wanted to show a
https://localhost/hairless-web/?wicket:interface=:2:itemRepeater:3:itemLink::ILinkListener::
// Mathias
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/More-on-wicket-url-stratergy-tp18212748p18240461.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey guys
I've been following the wicket-users list for quite some time to
evaluate the community and momentum, and just want to say great job!
before I continue ;)
Now the question... I'm starting to create a new real-world app, and
something happened that a Resource sent a Glassfish folder file
All,
I'm trying to discover which functional testing tool suits Wicket
development best. My options are:
- Canoo webtest
- Selenium
- Watir
I'd like some folks to create a couple of functional tests for our
wicket examples in one of these tools so that we get a complete
overview of all three
Can someone take a look into thisits a blocking issue for me
Thanks in advance
mfs wrote:
Guys,
I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink when
used on a page mounted though any of the
BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy extensions
To be
Committed fix to trunk and 1.3.
-Matej
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:10 PM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone take a look into thisits a blocking issue for me
Thanks in advance
mfs wrote:
Guys,
I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink when
used on a
i dont think anything in wicket generates a directory listing. are you
sure it is wicket code?
-igor
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Leon Nieuwoudt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys
I've been following the wicket-users list for quite some time to
evaluate the community and momentum, and just
I'm not very eager about this. The interface listeners URLs are quite
long, why making them even longer while bringing no additional
benefit? Also are you sure thath your patch won't break under any
circumstances relative urls? It took us a while to get relative URLs
working reliably, I wouldn't
I need to hide a textfield based on the URI path of the page that's
being visited. For instance:
http://www.mysite.com/app/foo (hide the field)
http://www.mysite.com/app/bar (hide the field)
http://www.mysite.com/app/* (any other path, show the field).
I don't want to use the HTTP URI
Well that's the weird part ;)
It's a new clean application, with one abstract WebPage class and a
few subclasses.
I'm pretty sure there's no code in wicket that will do this (neither
in this new app), so right now I'm creating a new test project to
determine where it goes skew.
I'll confirm
Ok, just recreated the problem with a new app, but still clueless why
it happens.
My configuration is Netbeans 6.1 with Glassfish 2 UR2, Apache Wicket
1.3.4, Ubuntu Hardy.
File listing happens with -
http://localhost:8081/testproject/test/resources/me.squeeze.SqueezePage/blahblah
404 exception
Just because you're using a CompoundPropertyModel on your Forms doesn't
mean you need it generified.
Sven
Roland Huss schrieb:
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats my point. you work on fields of one object, true, but it
But at the end, I want my model object back to do some business with it, so I
could either store the CPM myself for later reference (but why would I want
to do this ?) or retrieve it from the Form's model (typesafe, if possible).
That's why a generified Form would be nice.
... roland
svenmeier
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, marco m wrote:
I hear you Thomas. Maybe I should ask the question another way...does
anyone out there encapsulate their data access layer/service layer within
their model or do people put that stuff in their pages/components? Is anyone
using any patterns? if not...i feel
Another thought:
Why do we have a setter for the model actually?
I never call setDefaultModel() (formerly setModel()) in my code. In
wicket-examples it seems that most calls to setDefaultModel() are done
from inside the constructor (where it is sometimes needed because you
cannot call
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'm trying to discover which functional testing tool suits Wicket
development best. My options are:
- Canoo webtest
Haven't tried that but I and others have some good
experiences on HttpUnit / jWebUnit on which Canoo is based?
Or was at least :)
when i try this with wicket-quickstart project in svn and url
http://localhost:8080/quickstart/app/resources/org.apache.wicket.quickstart.QuickStartPage/foo
i get a blank page and in my log i see
ERROR - haredResourceRequestTarget - shared resource
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thought:
Why do we have a setter for the model actually?
Consider the case (that I sometimes have) where you want to set the
model in the component's constructor, but it needs a bit of
preparation first in such a way
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/helloworld/resources/org.apache.wicket.examples.helloworld.HelloWorld/
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i try this with wicket-quickstart project in svn and url
You might want to use wicket:message in cases like this. See:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html
Matthijs
Rakesh Sinha wrote:
Thanks Igor. That works.
Thanks Apache Wicket team once again for a wonderful framework.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL
I'm also worried about injecting repositories and such to UI
components, because it easily leads to domain logic to leak
to UI layer.
Sometimes the dividing line is thin though. Take for instance sorting
and grouping of lists. Sometimes that is very specific for a UI
screen, and it is a better
Anybody? I couldn't find anything digging around in the archives...
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mehrle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:13 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Enabling compoents based on Wicket URI path?
I need to hide a textfield
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also worried about injecting repositories and such to UI
components, because it easily leads to domain logic to leak
to UI layer.
Sometimes the dividing line is thin though. Take for instance sorting
and grouping of
Paging is definitely better left to the DB!
Yep :-)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks alot for the quick fix Matej. Verified it on 1.3 branch.
Farhan.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Committed fix to trunk and 1.3.
-Matej
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:10 PM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone take a look into thisits a blocking issue for me
Thanks in advance
So essentially, you need some variable to hold state and based on the
value of that variable, you show or hide a component, right?
Just use an IndexedParamCodingStrategy.
Does that make sense, or do you need more details?
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 11:12 -0700, Michael Mehrle wrote:
I need to
A little bit confused... perhaps I or you misunderstood. I'm using a
textfield in the 'navigator' section of my site. So, if a particular URL
is being accessed (.../foo or .../bar) then I want to hide the
textfield. Otherwise the navigator shows the textfield. Does that make
more sense?
Michael
A little bit confused... perhaps I or you misunderstood. I'm using a
textfield in the 'navigator' section of my site. So, if a particular URL
is being accessed (.../foo or .../bar) then I want to hide the
textfield. Otherwise the navigator shows the textfield. Does that make
more sense?
In
Hi,
I am a newbie in portlet world and I wonder if I can get any instruction to
get Wicket portlet working on Liferay 5?
I've searched the forums and found the portlet2-0.patch and applied to the
source. With that I made a simple wicket portlet application starts with a
page. The page provides
Hi -
I have a TextField component in my page.
Java :
txtAge = new TextField(txtAge, Integer.class);
lblAgeValidate = new Label(lblAgeValidate, );
html:
tdinput type=text wicket:id=txtAge //td
tdspan wicket:id=lblAgeValidate //td
I want a behavior to attach an
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Matej Knopp wrote:
I still don't see what's wrong with GenericPanel. It's certainly much
easier to type than ModelContainingPanel.
Nothing wrong with that either, it's just very generic :)
There are a lot of ways of making use of generics in a
component besides just
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Rakesh Sinha wrote:
I want a behavior to attach an ajax event handler to the textfield
such a way that anytime a text field changes - there would be an ajax
validation performed , that would update the model behind
lblAgeValidate - which will contain the error message.
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Johan Compagner wrote:
I still dont see a complete decoupling or do you mean only getDefaultXxxx()?
What I mean is that post-1.4 it would be good to remove the
defaultModel* stuff and other IModel dependencies from
Component, and maybe try to move towards a more case-by-case
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, ezegb wrote:
I'd like to stress that this same code is working elsewhere, though there's
no lonely textfields beneath in that form, but there are other similar
containers.
Sorry but it's very hard to get a grasp of the code from the
email -- at least I couldn't see
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, nate roe wrote:
I'm now using Wicket 1.3.3 but I'm still seeing this behavior, where when my
ListView is visited (from Form.loadPersistentFormComponentValues(),) my
listView's children is null when it is visited in
FormComponent.visitFormComponentsPostOrderHelper().
It
Hi Timo, yes I'm from Argentina, DNI's the Documento Nacional de Identidad :p
Regarding the issue, we did nail it down todays, turns out Ajax was
rejecting the request because of empty required textfields elsewhere in the
form. Now, the following issue is we couldn't quite catch the validation
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, ezegb wrote:
Hi Timo, yes I'm from Argentina, DNI's the Documento Nacional de Identidad :p
I thought it rang a bell :)
Regarding the issue, we did nail it down todays, turns out Ajax was
rejecting the request because of empty required textfields elsewhere in the
form.
Thanks Timo...
I tried something similar to this .. It works.
Java :
==
txtAge = new TextField(txtAge, new Model());
lblModel = new ErrorLabelModel();
lblAgeValidate = new Label(lblAgeValidate, lblModel);
lblAgeValidate.setOutputMarkupId(true);
txtAge.add(new
on a separate note - how do we turn off autocomplete for a TextField
in the java code. (other than autocomplete=off, in html).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Rakesh Sinha wrote:
I tried something similar to this .. It works.
...
txtAge.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onkeyup) {
This works otherwise but does not detect cut and paste done
with mouse.
The question is - can this be the fastest way of doing this...
What
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Rakesh Sinha wrote:
on a separate note - how do we turn off autocomplete for a TextField
in the java code. (other than autocomplete=off, in html).
Probably with an AttributeModifier setting that attribute.
E.g.
textField.add(new AttributeModifier(autocomplete, true, new
On 7/3/08, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008, Rakesh Sinha wrote:
I tried something similar to this .. It works.
...
txtAge.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onkeyup) {
This works otherwise but does not detect cut and paste done
with mouse.
Thanks
Hi,
I have a form with 2 address blocks where each block is a
WebMarkupContainer. The 1st block is the home address which basic the block
no, postal code, street name etc. The 2nd block is the billing address. So
when a user clicks on the check box stating that his home address is the
billing
What I mean is that post-1.4 it would be good to remove the
defaultModel* stuff and other IModel dependencies from
Component, and maybe try to move towards a more case-by-case
model handling in generified (actually
typed-after-their-default-model-type) components as well.
I'm very much in
77 matches
Mail list logo
