Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-08 Thread Alan Gutierrez
Quite often I find myself on the phone and I want to show someone a page. At that point I'm saying h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-t-h-i-n-k-n-o-l-a- dot-com-slash-p-o-s-t-... Hopefully I don't have to remember an md5 generated key to get them there. I'm a developer, but I do a lot of

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-06 Thread Johan Compagner
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15300068.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.comhttp://nabble.com

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-05 Thread Erik van Oosten
Actually, I currently have a client who thinks that good looking URLs are very important. Then again, he is no average joe either. Erik. Martijn Dashorst wrote: The average joe doesn't look at the URL... only developers do Martijn

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-05 Thread Johan Compagner
the question is what about the users of that client. I think nice looking urls is greatly exaggerated normal people look at the browser contents instead of the url How many times do i look at the url when i am browsing websites. I think never. Bookmarkable is another issue that should work for

Re: nice URLs (was: Short Design Question)

2008-02-05 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hi Johan, I agree. Still, bookmarkability (also a requested feature) is exactly the reason for going along with having nice URLs for every page, even after an AJAX update. I have a prototype that uses Realysimplehistory to allow a page to be bookmarkable after an AJAX update. Not sure yet how

Re: nice URLs (was: Short Design Question)

2008-02-05 Thread Gabor Szokoli
On 2/5/08, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Johan, Anyways, the fact remains that nice URLs can be important for some Wicket projects, despite what average Joes may look at. A big me too to that! We have a specific (and I beleive wise) requirement for bookmarkable, human readable

Re: nice URLs (was: Short Design Question)

2008-02-05 Thread Matej Knopp
If you use HybridUrlCodingStrategy the page is bookmarkable after ajax request. It can be recreated, but without the changes that ajax request made to it. But this is not just ajax request, you have same problems when using regular request. Wicket doesn't allow you to reflect fine grained changes

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-05 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On Feb 5, 2008 1:40 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the question is what about the users of that client. I think nice looking urls is greatly exaggerated normal people look at the browser contents instead of the url How many times do i look at the url when i am browsing websites.

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-05 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I posit that 99% of the users of our student information system don't even know what an URL is. Martijn On 2/5/08, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 1:40 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the question is what about the users of that client. I think nice

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-05 Thread Johan Compagner
really? how often do you type an url thats not just like google.com but something more behind it? i never do, i really cant remeber that i do that. Its history or bookmarked. johan On Feb 5, 2008 6:29 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 1:40 AM, Johan Compagner

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-05 Thread Árni Hermann Reynisson
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15300068.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-04 Thread Martijn Dashorst
in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246739.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-04 Thread Johan Compagner
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246739.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.comhttp

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-04 Thread Johan Compagner
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246739.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.comhttp

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-03 Thread oliverw
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246739.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread oliverw
giving away internal information - the user_id in this case? Or is this just something we have to live with? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15243739.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread djo mos
2008/2/2, oliverw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Short question: Let's say we have a user registration page. Upon success a result page is displayed using setResponsePage showing some kind of registration summary . Is there a way to avoid passing the database user_id of the newly created user to the

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread Juan Gabriel Arias
Or just pass the User object to the constructor. Juan

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread oliverw
to the summary page constructor ? Regards This works - kind of. Because even though the response page is mounted, I not see a pretty url in the browser. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246050.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread Edvin Syse
Can't you just proceed this way: setResponsePage(new SummaryPage(userdId)); i.e. pass the id as a parameter to the summary page constructor ? Regards This works - kind of. Because even though the response page is mounted, I not see a pretty url in the browser. You can mount the page with

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread oliverw
, SummaryPage.class)); -- Edvin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246739

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread Edvin Syse
Thanks Edwin! That did the trick. Just from the looks it appears as if HybridUrlCodingStrategy would be the preferable mount strategy in general. Absolutely :) Even if it adds the version as .version to the url, it is fully bookmarkable. If the current session doesn't include that version, it

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread oliverw
in context: http://www.nabble.com/Short-Design-Question-tp15243739p15246920.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Short Design Question

2008-02-02 Thread Edvin Syse
oliverw skrev: Oh an by the way. The constructor for my summary page looks like this at the moment: public RegistrationResultPage(final int user_id) { super(null); // model setup IModel model = new CompoundPropertyModel(new LoadableDetachableModel() {