Wicket, HTML or XHTML ?

2008-09-11 Thread pierre . goiffon
Hello, As a Wicket beginner, I was wondering if there are any contra-indication to generate some HTML 4.01 Strict instead of any XHTML 1.0 version (transitionnal or strict) ? I tried to simply add an HTML 4.01 strict doctype to my html files, and it seems to work fine (thought in development

Re: Wicket, HTML or XHTML ?

2008-09-11 Thread Erik van Oosten
For Wicket the doctype is not needed, so do what you like. Just remember to keep it in XML syntax. There is only one ceavat: you should always write div wicket:id=.../div instead of div wicket:id=.../, Wicket ignores the XML definition that specifies that these should be treated as semantically

Re: Wicket, HTML or XHTML ?

2008-09-11 Thread pierre . goiffon
Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/09/2008 15:06:05: For Wicket the doctype is not needed, so do what you like. Just remember to keep it in XML syntax. Reading this I wonder if I just have to produce well-formed html files ( http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-well-formed), or taking