Yeah I've for one always been very pro for wicketstuff.. It's nice keeping
things in one place.. Plus as you write if we share a somewhat similar
structure it's potentially easier to maintain..
2009/3/24 Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com
Hi-
I've been looking to integrate a complex security
Hi Ryan,
I added you to the Project Members, so feel free to commit your examples.
Unfortunately, until now I haven't had time to work on it myself
The idea was to let the code mature in
http://code.google.com/p/wicket-jsecurity/
and maybe move it to wicket-stuff later on.
Maybe we should move
Am 25.03.2009 um 10:17 schrieb nino martinez wael:
The problem with wicket stuff have been cleared up a bit, the part
about
which projects are dead and not.. Those in wicketstuff-core are
alive, and
if they become incompatible with the current version of wicket they
will be
kicked..
are
2009/3/25 Martin Funk mafulaf...@googlemail.com:
Am 25.03.2009 um 10:17 schrieb nino martinez wael:
The problem with wicket stuff have been cleared up a bit, the part about
which projects are dead and not.. Those in wicketstuff-core are alive, and
if they become incompatible with the current
Yep, I agree - please feel free to contribute.
We might want to hold off on the name change though. There *might* be a
name discrepancy with ki and another project in the interwebs. We're still
waiting on what we should do per the project Mentors after they come back
from Apache Con, where
On Mar 25, 2009, at 4:12 AM, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Hi Ryan,
I added you to the Project Members, so feel free to commit your
examples.
Unfortunately, until now I haven't had time to work on it myself
Thanks Maarten
The idea was to let the code mature in
I run Continuum on my server and just started receiving notifications two
days ago that inmethod grid was not compiling. It showed up right after the
commit of this ki security stuff.
I haven't looked at it yet, hoping that someone who was working with ki
security or inmethod would do so.
--
Hymm. I'm not sure what it could be... I did copy the inmethod-grid
pom to cuild the ki-secuity pom, but I think i got rid of any conflicts.
What is the error the Continuum server spits out? Perhaps it has
something to do with syringe? (committed about the same time as ki-
security)
http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=6786projectId=248projectGroupId=2
That shows what commit it started failing on, etc.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hymm. I'm not
dooh -- totally my fault. I unintentionally posted some local changes:
/trunk/wicketstuff-core/inmethod-grid-parent/inmethod-grid/src/main/
java/com/inmethod/grid/DataProviderAdapter.java
/trunk/wicketstuff-core/inmethod-grid-parent/inmethod-grid/src/main/
The commons-proxy snapshots will be in the repository on the build
server, because it's also running in the build server.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hymm. I'm not sure what it could be... I did copy the inmethod-grid pom to
cuild the ki-secuity
11 matches
Mail list logo
