Re: [videoblogging] Finally, A Stupid Web 2.0 Mental Masturbationfest Tanks

2006-12-13 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
Yeah Deirdré, I saw that (and you all can see it as well at ( http://www.leledainesi.com/archives/2006/12/12/a-new-movement-will-burn-tomorrow-from-leweb3/), and I think it's great and will participate. It's too bad that there hasn't been much more done but a parked domain name (which also speaks

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I was Attacked by NYPD ~ Wanna Watch?

2006-12-13 Thread Jan / The Faux Press
You were darned deep in the fray, dude. Talk about that, will you? Curious how you felt about your physical position. Jan On 12/13/06, ~ FluxRostrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: I was Attacked by NYPD ~ Wanna Watch? http://fluxrostrum.blogspot.com/2006/11/war-on-journalism.html I can

[videoblogging] News Cloud - Software for citizen journalists goes open source

2006-12-13 Thread Jan / The Faux Press
I've no way to evaluate the import of this, but it seemed interesting as it was compared to Drupal which I've heard is a good way to facilitate online community. Furthermore, liked how the News Cloud site felt / looked. http://blog.newscloud.com/2006/12/newscloud_relea.html The following is a

Re: [videoblogging] Finally, A Stupid Web 2.0 Mental Masturbationfest Tanks

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
One outcome in the Italian blogosphere was a desire to have a good conference here. I am, of course, pressing for the vlogEurope model. We need to find somebody big to sponsor and organize it. Language will always be a problem, especially in Italy. Doesn't prove much about France's

Re: [videoblogging] Finally, A Stupid Web 2.0 Mental Masturbationfest Tanks

2006-12-13 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
I briefly considered going, but the cost and stories from last year kept me away. Now I'm glad I didn't go. Instead I'll save my money and hope there's a reboot9 in Copenhagen next summer - this year it was too close to vloggercon so I didn't go. www.reboot.dk - more in your face than

[videoblogging] Re: News Cloud - Software for citizen journalists goes open source

2006-12-13 Thread Markus Sandy
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:31 AM, Jan / The Faux Press wrote: I've no way to evaluate the import of this, but it seemed interesting as it was compared to Drupal which I've heard is a good way to facilitate online community. interesting stuff. thanks for pointing this out P.S. Sorry for the

Re: [videoblogging] Helping Vlogs to Flog (Advertising payments to vloggers)

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Garfield
Dear Steve Krausz, Check out http://podsea.com/ --Steve On Dec 13, 2006, at 12:05 AM, J.D. wrote: This just in off Business 2.0 site An article on had this: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/ 2006/09/01/8384349/index.htm?postversion=2006102617 20 Smart Companies

Re: [videoblogging] Fireant podcatcher for the zune

2006-12-13 Thread Nathan Freitas
Woah that looks awesome! If only the Zune was worthy of FireAnt ;) +nathan Mike Meiser wrote: Anyone notice this? http://www.feedyour zune.com/ http://www.feedyourzune.com/ Imagine my suprise, I just stumbled on it at random and noticed it said powered by fireant. Way to hit the nail on

[videoblogging] NYT Blog features Ms. Congdon.

2006-12-13 Thread Jan / The Faux Press
http://screens.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/12/12/amanda-across-abc/ NYT Blog features Ms. Congdon. Thar she goes! Whoo! Jan -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com

[videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Jan / The Faux Press
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/BeSeenBeHeard/ You can send in your questions to Amanda via cell phone video. Yo! Jan -- The Faux Press - better than real http://fauxpress.blogspot.com

Re: [videoblogging] Re: I was Attacked by NYPD ~ Wanna Watch?

2006-12-13 Thread David King
I know it's serious content and a serious subject... but I couldn't help from chuckling a little when I saw the cops swipe ONE camera, even though there were at least 20 cameras there. It's just amazing to me that someone would even bother with taking one, when the others are all filming ... you

[videoblogging] Hello again! I shall reintroduce myself!

2006-12-13 Thread Edmund Yeo
Hola all, Been a while since I last posted (could be 9-10 months), since i barely made an impression, I doubt most peeps remember me. Anyway, I'm Edmund Yeo, who constantly brags to be the first Malaysian to ever sign up on Vlogmap.org, struggling writer filmmaker, even more struggling

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
Is there video of her somewhere? I can't find it on the site. On 12/13/06, Jan / The Faux Press [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/BeSeenBeHeard/ You can send in your questions to Amanda via cell phone video. Yo! Jan -- The Faux Press - better than real

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Vincent Njoroge Ndonye
try here http://abcnews.go.com/Amanda/ vincent On 12/13/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there video of her somewhere? I can't find it on the site. On 12/13/06, Jan / The Faux Press [EMAIL PROTECTED]jannie.jan%40gmail.com wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Garfield
Here you go: http://blogs.abcnews.com/amanda/2006/12/test.html On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote: Is there video of her somewhere? I can't find it on the site. On 12/13/06, Jan / The Faux Press [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/BeSeenBeHeard/

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread CarLBanks
This gives me hope that I could be picked up one day. On 12/13/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here you go: http://blogs.abcnews.com/amanda/2006/12/test.html On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote: Is there video of her somewhere? I can't find it on the site.

[videoblogging] Re: News Cloud - Software for citizen journalists goes open source

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
It appears interesting but its early days, not quite enough documentation. I dont think its really a CMS like Drupal. Joomla etc. It appears to be more like a system for easily posting links to news stories to your blog, grouping news content by tag, and stuff like that. It doesnt seem to actually

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
God would someone at ABC learn to SPELL? It's embarassing that a news organization can't use a spell checker. On 12/13/06, Vincent Njoroge Ndonye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: try here http://abcnews.go.com/Amanda/ vincent On 12/13/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Whats the spelling mistake you refer to? I didnt enjoy the video, the adverts drove me crazy and I thought it was overproduced. Its too early for me to call it a poor-mans rocketboom but I will anyway. Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] Re: News Cloud - Software for citizen journalists goes open source

2006-12-13 Thread Jan / The Faux Press
Thanks for your fine analysis, Steve. I'd thought it had blog-like features as well. Oh well. :) Still, it might be advantageous to a commnity or group of vlog editors who had a group vlog and wanted to also share on-point news stories in an efficient way. Jan On 12/13/06, Steve Watkins

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Amanda Congdon
That IS embarrassing, Deirdre! What's misspelled? Weirdly, the big issues I've had with ABC have been related to interface design and infrastructure, not content. They don't touch my scripts. I am working on them to change the henious javascript among other things-- and blogging about my progress

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread andrew michael baron
Jeeze, I have never been so offended. Its like Alice and Wonderland around here, somebody pinch me: http://www.dembot.com/011895.html On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:47 AM, CarLBanks wrote: This gives me hope that I could be picked up one day. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Amanda Congdon
Andrew, get a grip. Please. This http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=rocketboom.comurl=rocketboom.com is not my fault. You made the decision to let me go. So I went. As for your outlandish claims about HBO and ABC, please contact my lawyers. Let's do this the right way. And

RE: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Obreahny O'Brien
This gives me hope that I could be picked up one day -illogical comparison; that's not going to happen my man, unless you too have those rocketboom boobies. all is not lost though. you could facilitate gynecomastia with these : http://www.bustbuilder.com/ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
Wow you still havent got over this? You still dont recognise that this whining makes you look like a bit of an ass? You think you can turn back time or use legal means to ensure you get the credit etc you deserve for all those wonderfully original ideas and contract negotiations? Its not like

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
It's not in your section, but a couple of things leaped out at me - the usual affect instead of effect somewhere (which actually requires a human copy editor) and there was another I don't remember now. Congrats - the new show looks good! I'm mailing you separately a hometown shot for your

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Quirk
The bottom of the page calls this thing we all live on the Iternet. It's not too early to call it a rich-girl's rocketboom either. Call it whatever you want, just don't call it entertaining, informative, or worth my time. On 12/13/06, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread andrew michael baron
Amanda, I have always been outspoken about sharing my experiences with Rocketboom and this is no longer an exception. You can hide talking about it publicly, we see how that has led to your advantage. As long as no one speaks up, you continue to lie and mislead people about what you have

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread jesse.cooper
A creative partnership I thought you all had that with rocketboom... now it sounds as if you would like to creatively get paid by ABC for what Amanda does regardless if you are a part of it or not. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
Y'know, if anyone else in the world had posted about their new videoblog they were all excited about (and Amanda didn't even start this thread), 99% of this group would at least try to be nice, no matter what we actually thought of it, because we all believe videoblogging is important and want to

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread mariolibrandi
Andrew, There is nothing to hide. Facts are facts. You made a mistake by kicking us out and now you have to live with it. Good luck with the lawsuit. And if you really want to share experiences, I am still waiting for that $7,050 check. I've always said to Amanda that we should just have a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread andrew michael baron
I dont want anything at all right now. I just want to talk about it. I think its lame, that all. I have not filed a suit against Amanda. If you had a business yourself and one of your partners left and took all of your contacts and business relationships, your code, your design and your

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread andrew michael baron
Great, easy. Chuck, you are the man with the answer. It was the night before Amanda posted her video. As our mediator, I told you I was going to make a demand. I said I was no longer negotiating and I demanded that Amanda come into work on Monday and film a news day for Rocketboom.

[videoblogging] Re: I was Attacked by NYPD ~ Wanna Watch?

2006-12-13 Thread Aldon Hynes
Very powerful video. I posted a quick link to it on my blog http://www.orient-lodge.com/node/2098 and added it to NewsTrust http://beta.newstrust.net/webx?14@@.f00bdeb (I would encourage people to check out NewsTrust, a new site where people can review articles based on their journalistic

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread john coffey
Damn, now that Amanda Is back for another 15 minutes maybe I should bring back Demanda Condom to my show. Jimmy CraicHead TV http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, get a grip. Please. This

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread whigrose1860
In a message dated 12/13/2006 2:46:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In two and a half years on this group I have rarely, if ever, seen anyone attack anyone else's work on whatever grounds. Disagree with content, points of view, etc., but never be downright vicious.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread schlomo rabinowitz
For those that know me knows that I definitely do not have the hippie/let's all get along/commune for artist thing. The rocketboom brouhaha is nothing new, its typical business-as-usual. People work together, people disagree, people get angry and lawyers are called. It sucks for everyone

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Jeremy Rayner
Good to see you on techie topics again Amanda, any chance the RSS feed could be fixed so that I can subscribe with fireant (Error parsing channel feed http://blogs.abcnews.com/amanda/index.rdf ) Ciao Jez. http://jez.blip.tv -- Groovy Engineer http://javanicus.com/blog2 [Non-text portions of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread john coffey
Right on Steve! I began to think Andrew was a real schmuck when he posted the contract from Microsoft re Zune on his blog. JCH http://www.jchtv.com/ --- Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wow you still havent got over this? You still dont recognise that this whining makes you look like a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Quirk
So why did you single out Amanda for this vitriol? Only because she has lied to the public, specifically us in this group, about the Rocketboom situation, and has underhandedly stolen our colleague Andrew's hard work, time, and business contacts and passed them off as her own. I find it's

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Josh Leo
and then Andrew Called me, I hosted Rocketboom that day, Punched Oprah in the face and demanded that Amanda and Mario make me a Pizza using only the ingredients in my refrigerator! Ok Who is next? to everyone involved in this argument: please be quiet and let's just see how things play out...

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
Damn! I knew we forgot something on the vlogEurope program! On 12/13/06, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the end, though I'm not a hippie, I still like Group Hugs! Group Hug!!! -- best regards, Deirdré Straughan www.beginningwithi.com (personal) www.tvblob.com (work)

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread wlight
For those that know me knows that I definitely do not have the hippie/let's all get along/commune for artist thing. The rocketboom brouhaha is nothing new, its typical business-as-usual. People work together, people disagree, people get angry and lawyers are called. It sucks for everyone

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Amanda Congdon
Hey Jez, We will definitely have a subscription option. Right now they have one, but it doesn't support enclosures. This is my #1 priority. Oh, and Adam, you are right. You don't know me. And it's clear you don't Andrew very well either. Interesting that you automatically take what he says

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread sull
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZuk99jFnN4 :) sull On 12/13/06, Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Jez, We will definitely have a subscription option. Right now they have one, but it doesn't support enclosures. This is my #1 priority. Oh, and Adam, you are right. You don't

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
As I've said several times before, I was and remain determinedly agnostic about this whole situation - I don't know or care who's right, and it may not be possible for anyone short of some omniscient deity (and I don't believe in one) to ever know the truth. So you have taken sides and dislike

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Chuck Olsen
thankyou thankyou thankyou! --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZuk99jFnN4 :)

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Chuck Olsen
First -- I want to say congrats to Amanda. It's very surreal seeing her on ABCnews.com, sort of like the grownups left the cameras and lights on and she snuck in and made a show. I'm also tickled to see links to AAA shows I edited up there (Atrios, Vilsack, Jarvis). As for rehashing

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Peter Leppik
No RSS feed? No iTunes version? Flash video only, and the player doesn't want to play in my browser. Gosh, this video blogging stuff must really be scaring ABC, because someone REALLY wants to keep me from watching it. On Dec 13, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Amanda Congdon wrote: That IS

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Quirk
It definitely has nothing to do with your level of intelligence or hair color. You're right though, it was a judgement call on my part, as it is with anyone trying to decipher the truth from two opposing viewpoints. Luckily I know Andrew well enough to make that a fairly easy decision. As for

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Loiez D.
old Europe thinks that htpp://www.youtube.com/v/vr3x_RRJdd4 Loiez [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
I feel its likely that the non-enclosure feed and popup stuff is part of ABC business strategy rather than technical boob. I would think the lack of enclosures reflects a desire to control distribution, ensure adverts are watched, and monitor viewing figures. The popup gives all the video on

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Warner
The ads bothered me so much, I probably won't watch again. I love Amanda's posts, but I just can't stand to sit through commercials, especially on a video blog, at least not when they're shown first thing. Commercials are exactly the thing that deters me from watching much television anymore.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Brett Gaylor
On 12/13/06, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZuk99jFnN4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGnYw-OuCnI :) sull On 12/13/06, Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]amanda%40amandacongdon.com wrote: Hey Jez, We will definitely have a subscription

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
I do not know Andrew or Amanda very well so its not that easy for me, and I tried to ignore most of the details whent he whole thing flared up in the first place, but still my mind wants to reach conclusions. Our brains like to do that, I think the internal filing systems demand that judgements be

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Adam Quirk
I agree, that was bad form. I will save any artistic critique for parody videos and Evilvlog. I feel like Charlie Watts is probably a decent guy. On 12/13/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As I've said several times before, I was and remain determinedly agnostic about this

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Loiez D.
Le 13 déc. 06 à 22:48, Loiez D. a écrit : old Europe thinks that Sorry for the bugg May be a good link here ;-) http://www.youtube.com/p.swf?video_id=vr3x_RRJdd4eurl=iurl=http%3A// sjl-static7.sjl.youtube.com/vi/ vr3x_RRJdd4/2.jpgt=OEgsToPDskL8lSG6JLxr0KsY71BM1jlG Loiez (Copy and paste of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Peter Leppik
Deirdre: Since it is ABC, I think the expectation is that the standards will be higher. But I can't comment on the video itself, since I can't watch it. ^*@ broken flash player. -Peter On Dec 13, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Deirdre Straughan wrote: Y'know, if anyone else in the world

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Amanda Congdon
Ugh. I know. It's giving me heartburn. That's why I'm venting on my personal site. I am working very aggressively to get a lot of things changed regarding the entire look and feel. While it is slow working with msm, they've listened to me so far about nearly everything ... so I'm hopeful

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Ron Watson
Sorry Amanda, please don't think I'm piling on you. It's just that a straw broke the camel's back. Why must people keep talking about the MSM... As if it's mainstream! It's a Corporate Media, and there's nothing 'Mainstream' about it. Mainstream media would have 5 second commercials and

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
This retraction in the LA Times puts the Alexa numbers in a more accurate context: http://tinyurl.com/wsrq7 Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=rocketboom.comurl=rocketboom.com

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread sull
Hey Ya! That was Brilliant! Thanks Brett. Nothing like a lil charlie brown to infiltrate an awkward thread :) On 12/13/06, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/13/06, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] sulleleven%40gmail.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZuk99jFnN4

Re: [videoblogging] OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
Den 13.12.2006 kl. 16:54 skrev Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: God would someone at ABC learn to SPELL? It's embarassing that a news organization can't use a spell checker. I used to have a student job at a media house (if you think journalists can't spell, you should see the captions

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread WWWhatsup
First time I tried it I just got the Ad and nothing else.. Reload worked. My Yahoo! did accept the rtf. I thought the production was cheezy compared to RB, even the swing shotas were kind of mistimed. And webpage screenshots in embedded flash are not a good idea. Competition is good, right?

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Steve Watkins
I dont feel like that issue does any harm to the argument that people are the future of media. Its not going to be won or lost in an argument anyway, the viewers will decide by voting with their eyeballs. Depending on how you look at it, its now almost become accepted by the large corps

[videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Charles Hope
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry Amanda, please don't think I'm piling on you. It's just that a straw broke the camel's back. Why must people keep talking about the MSM... As if it's mainstream! It's a Corporate Media, and there's

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Ron Watson
This medium is going to be lost because people don't know how to talk about it. As if the Corporate Media is just going to give this shit away. Language is a powerful tool, and the Corporate Media are masters at manipulating it; that's what they do. You can say MSM or Mainstream all you

[videoblogging] You NYC Vloggers!

2006-12-13 Thread Charles Hope
I'd like to remind you that there is a mailing list specifically for us and our local issues. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nyc_vloggers/ See you all at the Art Bar on Friday!

[videoblogging] Re: Amanda's Up we're

2006-12-13 Thread Smithie Boho
Dating!! xoxoxo I'll see you later Amanda! Smooches Smithie Boho Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com

Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

2006-12-13 Thread Deirdre Straughan
On 12/13/06, Peter Leppik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Deirdre: Since it is ABC, I think the expectation is that the standards will be higher. LOL! All we do in this group is talk about how MSM sucks and we can do better! Well, now one of our own gets to go and prove it. But I can't