For the record, I don't really have any issue with Andreas making the
manifesto, I will say that like Verdi and Cheryl stated, for the
manefisto to come out after soliciting video's etc, put me off. I
would have liked to have known that before hand. The manifesto is to
a degree trying to
Steve Watkins wrote:
Anarchism
as it is popularly misunderstood, has a flaw in that either external or
internal forces could
take control and intimidate people far wose than their own government ever
could.
It is impossible for chaotic gangs of rabble to even dream of slaughtering or
Sometimes maybe but other times the regulations are there for very good
reasons, such as
public health. Would removing regulation of advertising benefit the honest?
Deregulation of the banking sector in recent decades plays a large part in the
financial
nightmare that has begun.
I would
Hello videobloggers!
Sorry I've not been around much (mainly lurking) but I am working on a
video project right now that needs some disaster footage, think
hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, extreme weather conditions... Also
looking for some good city-scape stuff, lots of building in a big
Hi everyone,
Has anyone ever had to pay to use tubemogul.com or do you know if
there is a limit per month or year on how many videos you can upload?
Thank you,
Jill
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is impossible for chaotic gangs of rabble to even dream of
slaughtering or
stealing on the scale that governments have in the 20th century.
I'm pretty sure the slaughtering in a lawless society, where people
are
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of you are assuming network scarcity. Networks are only scarce
when
regulated by a government (FCC, USPS, et al.) Most government
regulation is
designed by large corporate lobbyists to thwart competition
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 4:01 pm, noel hidalgo wrote:
dear america,
you are truly becoming a third world nation ruled by corporations.
See, that's not the feeling I get for plans that work by charging people
for bandwidth by use. This is one company picking one service to try.
Customers may
Eh, I'll probably just use mefeedia and cross my fingers...
Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The only other easy solution I can think of is the tagging thing -
ie.,
everyone upload to Blip and use the same tag. Then subscribe to the
rss feed
for
Geoff, I've been using a free app called ffmpegx. It's worked pretty
well so far, and you can find it here:
http://homepage.mac.com/major4/
Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, geoffdgeorge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I recently took a trip to San Francisco, and I wanted to use some
You mean like the Internet?
Hi Charles!
On Jan 18, 2008 2:05 PM, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judging from some of the attitudes here, one might be inclined to think
that
vlogging was invented by the government and promoted by grants.
[Non-text portions of this message have been
Oh come now, thats a bit of a distortion. Technology evolves, government often
provides
the research or the money for research that enables the foundation of the
technology. In
recent decades the trend is then to opn this technology up for other uses,
commercialised
by the private sector,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see how my arguments would appear empty to anybody who can't
distinguish
between having benefited from and in spite of. They can observe
plucky
survival under harsh conditions, and credit the survival upon the
Chris wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you put honor system in quotes? I never used that phrase.
It wasn't
the honor system or any other sort of kindness that put cheap cell
phones in
the hands of nearly everybody in the West, rich
The Internets were largely, if I recall, developed by private companies
(like BBN) under (D)ARPA grant. While the funding came from .gov, the
innovation came from .com. Soon thereafter .com pretty much took over,
no?
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL
The real world isn't black and white, even if we'd like it to be. There
are varying degrees of regulation. Some regulation can be good.
Stifling regulation is rarely, if ever, good. Pink unicorns may have
managed to bring us a chocolate river while some regulation existed, but
you'd be
While I generally agree with you that corporations are not automatically
evil, that government is not automatically good and that free markets
are wonderful, I still find it curious that you insist that there are
no defenses of free markets reliant upon such ludicrous assumptions.
I'm sure
Chris wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if I'm not willing to place implicit trust in this mystical
honor system you seem to believe in, that will magically rein in
these entities that have so far shown no compunctions against raping
the
Chris wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Eddie!
There are probably fewer than five people on this list that would
find any
value in the old-school ARPANET the government gave us decades ago.
Everything
newer than that, and the cheap
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some equivalent to Godwin's Law regarding free market fights?
There should be.
Rule Number One: You do not talk about Free Market Fight Club. ;)
Chris
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brian Richardson -
WhatTheCast? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something tells me if I needed the government to do that for me it
would
cost $30,000 in somebody elses tax dollars, take two weeks to produce
and sound like it was recorded on a Victrola ... and
Hi Chris,
cross my fingers? :)
You may want to try:
http://mefeedia.com/tags/semanal08/videostream_widgets/
(this is available for any tag)
We are working on developing something even better in this area, and
have taken the wish list posted by Rupert on the Ning site as a
starting point.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I, like you, had no idea how naked self-interest could
paradoxically result
in good quality at affordable prices, my worldview would be equally
depressive.
Arguments of quality and price are not the whole of the
Hey Eddie!
There are probably fewer than five people on this list that would find any
value in the old-school ARPANET the government gave us decades ago. Everything
newer than that, and the cheap hardware and software that made vlogging
possible, is a chocolate river brought to us by pink
The only other easy solution I can think of is the tagging thing - ie.,
everyone upload to Blip and use the same tag. Then subscribe to the rss feed
for that search.
But that breaks down if people are using YouTube or other non-blip places to
upload their videos.
Just some thoughts...
David
On
Ok we will call it a lakeside discussion ;)
Heath
http://batmangeek.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jay, I think this would make for an interesting panel at
vloggercamp! Not only fair use, but the overall effect of
linking,
etc
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i dont think there are any plug and play systems you can install for
group projects.
Ning certainly does make it easy and they do let you customize.
they own the content as far as i can see.
I've no aversion to
I think Jay is right from the creators' perspective, but I would like
to look at this from a different angle, namely the relationship
between a video maker and the subject. When I ask for permission to
photograph someone without a written release, I usually explain why I
am taking the
Jay, I think this would make for an interesting panel at
vloggercamp! Not only fair use, but the overall effect of linking,
etc
Heath
http://batmangeek.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Two laywers (one from NBC, the other from Columbia law
Ive not tried any white label social networking stuff myself but this
comparison chart may
be useful to you:
http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/wlsn_comparison_chart.html
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
Actually this was one of the more civil discussions I've seen here in recent
months, although hilariously cynical and sarcastic at points. Enjoyed
reading it. Some good points all around, I learned a couple things to boot,
and was confused thoroughly by others. Like, do these river-dwelling
I have used this Tubemogul since the last week of December. I have been able to
upload videos on 12 sites once. Not paid so far. Here are some pros and cons
about the Tubemogul.
1. Pros: absolutely free
2. Pros: the statistisics to show how many people watched each day on each
site and
Is there some equivalent to Godwin's Law regarding free market fights?
There should be.
Brook
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
www.brookhinton.com
studio vlog/blog: www.brookhinton.com/temporalab
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 5:45 pm, Chris wrote:
I don't think anybody, short of a few free market utopians, suggested
that anybody was arguing the government should be doing everything for
everybody.
True, but it seems people want someone to save them if the cable company
decides to charge per
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arguments of quality and price are not the whole of the argument.
There's environmental impact, fair treatment of labor and a whole lot
of other factors that I don't feel an unregulated free market would
adequately address.
On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Charles HOPE wrote:
There are probably fewer than five people on this list that would
find any
value in the old-school ARPANET the government gave us decades ago.
btw, who are the other four? Hey, Mr RichardShow, are you one?
our particular kind of value
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you put honor system in quotes? I never used that phrase.
It wasn't
the honor system or any other sort of kindness that put cheap cell
phones in
the hands of nearly everybody in the West, rich and poor. It
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Eddie!
There are probably fewer than five people on this list that would
find any
value in the old-school ARPANET the government gave us decades ago.
Everything
newer than that, and the cheap hardware and
dear america,
you are truly becoming a third world nation ruled by corporations.
sincerely,
noneck
ps - it's great to see that after 6 months traveling the globe,
america is starting to take after other innovation leaders... i for
one can't wait to get back to dial up! i love pine
I have been working with them for some time. I upload almost daily a new
episode to cross post elsewhere. So far have not received any notices about
limits or about fees. I like the convenience, the interface, and the stats
(assuming they're as accurate as to be expected - but don't get me started
Here is very interesting research comparing different ways that various sites
(blip.tv, Veoh, Vimeo, Google Video and YouTube) encode Flash video.
http://hastalavistavista.wordpress.com/category/video-datasheets/
Are there any ning alternatives for us non-techies, for whom a
customized WordPress site isn't an option?
I've a hankering to set up my own vlog challenge community, but would
rather run my own AdSense ads than ning's (and I don't want to pay
$19.95 a month for that option).
Jay, I think this would make for an interesting panel at
vloggercamp! Not only fair use, but the overall effect of linking,
etc
cool! though I think at Vloggercamp we should have no panels.
we can have workshops or time to hang out and talk about these things
by a lake with no wifi.
Yes, rumors have been going around that they're about to go to a paid model.
In fact, someone I know was contacted by them yesterday saying he'd gone
over the submitting new limit and they wanted to discuss a paid model
with him
Note: They did not delete his account. To their credit, they
fwiw,
i met mark rotblat from tubemogul last year at a vlogger meetup
i got the impression that this was intended to be a for-pay service.
However, upon looking at the current site, i see nothing about
pricing for more than the 10 vid limit.
markus
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Bill Cammack
On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Charles HOPE wrote:
There are probably fewer than five people on this list that would
find any
value in the old-school ARPANET the government gave us decades ago.
Everything
newer than that, and the cheap hardware and software that made
vlogging
On Jan 18, 2008, at 2:18 PM, geoffdgeorge wrote:
So, I recently took a trip to San Francisco, and I wanted to use some
footage from old tourism videos of the city that I found on the
Internet Archive. Most of the videos there are either MPEG-4 or MPEG-
2 files, and here's where the problem
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rupert, Zenuno, and I have been a little bothered by Ning.
Dont like how it sends notifications emails without the message text
(only
link to site).
Plus it doesnt look like we can get access to the info we're all
Steve Watkins wrote:
Sometimes maybe but other times the regulations are there for very good
reasons, such as
public health. Would removing regulation of advertising benefit the honest?
Deregulation of the banking sector in recent decades plays a large part in
the financial
nightmare
Thanks for the link - excellent reading!
We have found that the abandonment rate goes up exponentially when the
user has to wait more than 3 seconds for a video to load. YouTube
consistently delivers on this playback experience - partially because
of their philosophy on bitrate and partially
yay!
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Chris wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All of you are assuming network scarcity. Networks are only
Yes, rumors have been going around that they're about to go to a paid model.
In fact, someone I know was contacted by them yesterday saying he'd gone
over the submitting new limit and they wanted to discuss a paid model with
him.
Note: They did not delete his account. To their credit, they
I don't use Tubemogul, but a bunch of people here have mentioned that
they like it. I haven't heard anything about them having a limit on
their uploads or having to pay for anything.
--
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jt_hanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
All of you are assuming network scarcity. Networks are only scarce when
regulated by a government (FCC, USPS, et al.) Most government regulation is
designed by large corporate lobbyists to thwart competition pressure from
smaller players. Deregulation benefits the honest.
David Meade wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ive not tried any white label social networking stuff myself but
this comparison chart may
be useful to you:
http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/wlsn_comparison_chart.html
Thanks, Steve. This definitely gives me
Brian Richardson - WhatTheCast? wrote:
My cell provider gives me the option for a flat rate SMS email plan,
which is one reason I use them over other providers. For every
per-megabyte cable provider there will be an alternative all you can
suck WiMAX or DSL provider.
But surely these low
Simpler than ffmpegx is Mpeg Streamclip. You do need to have either
Compressor, DVD Studio Pro, or purchase the quicktime mpeg2 component
though, but the program itself is free:
www.squared5.com
Basically, yes, you need to get the files out of a temporally
compressed format and into something
57 matches
Mail list logo
