Hello,
Has anyone tried YouTube video ads?
There seems to be 2 kinds...
- http://www.youtube.com/advertise#videoads
- http://www.youtube.com/advertise#invideoads
Any one has any experience with these?
What kind of targeting is available with these?
What's the paying scheme? CPM? CPT? CPC?
I don't think file *size* is as important as data rate.
Like Verdi's saying, you want people to be able to view your videos
without them constantly stopping to buffer. The better quality you
can get at lower data rates, the more likely you are for people to
watch your show and not get frustrated
that is the trick though, finding the right data rate, now for Macs
there are all kinds of good advice on that but for PC'sit's hard
to findit's something I am playing with a lot right now, trying
to find a good data rate and size for PC's.
I have for a while been exporting as an avi
Well the data rate settings should be the same on Windows as on OS X. The
problem is if
your video editing package doesnt have the right encoder built in, and you have
to go to
an intermediate format that is then loaded into an encoder. Ther are potential
problems
where either quality is
Yeah I think you are right. I love simplicity but seem bad at achieving it
myself. Im trying
through, have put ideas about needing a new fancy flash player to power this
stuff, to one
side for now, JW FLV player is good enough for a start, and Im getting way
ahead of
myself.
For prototyping
Yes,decent source footage is vital, but its easy to throw away that advantage
with poor
choice of final encoding settings.
The more I watch that video, the more I see areas that would have benefitted
from a
higher bitrate. The nature of the footage also lends itself to tolerating
low-bitrate
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,decent source footage is vital, but its easy to throw away that
advantage with poor
choice of final encoding settings.
Absolutely. People don't understand that compression is as much of an
art as filming or
I've been thinking about what Charles said.
In theory we could extend wordpress' trackback mechanism.
I'm not sure exactly how it currently works, but we could basically
just extend it to identify video enclosures and embed those in the
original blog post comments area.
This might be THE
Excatly Bill, dead on, the more movement you have and the lighting is
key. That is where I noticed it, when I did a 'music video' of my
driving around, a lot of footage was shot was I was driving at a
fairly high speed (50 mph) with the trees flowing by, etc at the
recomended file settings,
You know. I remember reading somewhere that, when the HTTP
protocol (that the web is build upon) was being designed, they
actually wanted a include a mechanism to keep track of what other
pages were linking to you.
If I recall correctly, the HTTP Referer and yes you're suppose
to
Rather than extending the TrackBack or Pingback protocols, perhaps we
could support the marking of the video (and being the content...
and thus the thing being a video comment) with some Semantic HTML.
I.e., using HTML classes, special HTML elements, and HTML rel and
rev attributes to express
The SEO value of TubeMogul or TrafficGeyser is that you can
IMMEDIATELY get your video ranked highly in a search, even on highly
competitive search terms. And with many sites, you can link your
profile page and/or keywords back to your site, so you also boost your
own page. Let's assume everyone
Actually I just remembered that I solved a problem similar to this
when I was writing the VideoPress Video Embed plugin.
The VideoPress Video Embed plugin provide code other people can use to
embed your video on other people's pages.
The thing is, I marked that embed code semantically with a
Charles,
Regarding semantic markup... Indeed.
That's why i made mention of XFN earlier to imply that taking the same
concepts of people relations through semantics (my profiles and
friends profiles and discovering connections), the same should be
applied to the conversations being had among these
I use little Sony earbuds and I haven't experienced any delay. Maybe try
messing around with the AT and wind cut options? Not sure.
On Feb 5, 2008 1:10 PM, Christopher Polack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone experienced an audio delay while using headphones with the
HV20? I've tried it
I like the use of cite and rev/rel -- it's meaning that's already defined.
cite
a rel=enclosure class=comment href=...
type=video/...img class=thumbnail src=thumbnail.jpg //a
In Response to: a rev=comment
href=http://example.com/what_i_am_commenting_to;.../a
/cite
Seems to say it all.
If you're using Flickr why not just let flickr resize them?
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
Motorsport Videos
http://TireBiterZ.com/
Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
On Feb 5, 2008 11:38 AM, John Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit off the
Thanks Charles, I'll start there and see what happens.
JC
--- Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you're using Flickr why not just let flickr
resize them?
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
Motorsport Videos
http://TireBiterZ.com/
Vlog
comments below
On Feb 5, 2008 1:33 PM, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the use of cite and rev/rel -- it's meaning that's already defined.
cite
a rel=enclosure class=comment href=...
type=video/...img class=thumbnail src=thumbnail.jpg //a
In Response to: a rev=comment
Hey,
On Feb 5, 2008 10:33 AM, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the use of cite and rev/rel -- it's meaning that's already defined.
cite
a rel=enclosure class=comment href=...
type=video/...img class=thumbnail src=thumbnail.jpg //a
In Response to: a rev=comment
It's wonderful to see excitement about this topic again, but as Sull says
some level of samepageism is missing. I also have a feeling this list is
not the optimal place to design such a system (a smaller working group
would be better for starters).
The last time the topic was seriously
Mmm yes. It makes sense to talk about it here, but only if it can be done in a
way that
encourages wider input. It may b hard at this stage as a working prototype
might be a lot
clearer to the masses than attempt to put it into words, but may as well keep
talking about
it here for now
On Feb 5, 2008 3:12 PM, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no problem with rel=cite as an evolving standard... but most
people don't use it yet and there's no reason we need to stick
strictly to links using rel=cite.
Anyway, it's irrelevant if we're using trackbacks. I assume
Here here.
I'm very pleased with where this is headed.
I'd like to keep the conversation as open (non-technical) as possible.
Where you say media agnostic... I completely agree. It would be
cool to have images embeded in the responses as well... and of course
audio clips.
We could make the
I was hearing an ³echo² type thing last time. Freaked me out, but it wasn¹t
on the tape. Luckily.
On 2/5/08 1:22 PM, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use little Sony earbuds and I haven't experienced any delay. Maybe try
messing around with the AT and wind cut options? Not
On Feb 5, 2008 3:50 PM, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmm yes. It makes sense to talk about it here, but only if it can be done in
a way that
encourages wider input. It may b hard at this stage as a working prototype
might be a lot
clearer to the masses than attempt to put it into
Hi John,
If you¹re spending all that time scanning them, which takes time, I¹d
suggest scanning at print resolution, which is 300 dpi. You never know when
you might need something going to print. You can always downconvert for web
later. But you can¹t take web ready art and make it print ready.
Just scanning.
Sweet, love the gravatar idea and that you already have included video
enclosures in the comment RSS feeds.
Can't wait to read up on gravatars (http://site.gravatar.com/). There
have to be other explorations of this idea too. I think a user
thumbnail is a natural piece of
Check your settings to see if there's an audio setting to listen off tape.
If there *is such an option, that's very cool to know since that is a more
'pro' kinda thing - to hear what you've actually recorded as opposed to a
signal that just goes straight through the camera electronics.
That made
Yes, yes and yes.
I had a 'no-brainer' FCP project that should have been a couple hour render
take all day.
QT7.4 caused a memory leak in FCP4.5 that required me keep an eye on iStat,
watching the
memory consumed, but not released by FCP. Once it got near to maxed out I had
to quit the
I still keep my video at 320x240. Unless there is a really good reason, I'm
doing some real
high art lets say (which I'm not), there is no reason to waste that much
bandwidth. The
bandwidth is not free and it is not limitless. Someone somewhere has to pay for
it, and I dont
see the point of
Wow - 320x240. I haven't produced video that small in over a year. I think
that 512x288 is the minimum I'd do, and most of the stuff we shoot is
640x360. We recently produced the video for the Santa Barbara International
Film Festival and we did Flash, iPod 640x360 and HD 960x540. We interviewed
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7.4 also breaks renders over 10 minutes long (that's rendering time,
not project time) in After Effects, and misc. problems have been
reported with pre-FCPStudio2 Apple Pro products as well, though its
the After
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still keep my video at 320x240. Unless there is a really good
reason, I'm doing some real
high art lets say (which I'm not), there is no reason to waste that
much bandwidth. The
bandwidth is not free and it is not
Looks interesting.
February 8-10, 2008
http://www.video24-7.org/
35 matches
Mail list logo
