wow, i had no idea. i just read chance's recount as well.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Heath heathpa...@msn.com wrote:
wow makes you wonder what the heck is going onand makes me less
interested in being a part of things like this...
Heath
http://heathparks.com/blog
--- In
barrett's post is right on target in terms of solutions, sounds like
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Heath heathpa...@msn.com wrote:
wow makes you wonder what the heck is going onand makes me less
interested in being a part of things like this...
Heath
http://heathparks.com/blog
I'm also glad that it wasn't like the Oscars. LA NY people
consolidating their power.
And Chance's personal story is depressing, but really... the whole
thing reads like a Greek tragedy. Pride before the fall. I mean, he
*really* thought he was going to the Oscars?? And brought all his
Gena, wonderful. RSS feed has been added.
And I see you're a frequent poster too, I like that.
Day 2...
The Knife Game.
Please people, do not attempt this at home. I have many years of injury free
Knife Game training and would hate for an amateur to get seriously hurt while
attempting to
Day 3 with a bit of music and art http://bit.ly/cHxJGd Watching other videos
when I can.
Gena
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mgmoon mgm...@... wrote:
Well, it's Sunday.
It starts today... Videobloggingweek2010.
April 11-17
Grab your camcorders and shoot some video.
Mike
Rupert Howe: And I can't agree with the `It's terrible for the industry!'
people. It will be *good* for the profile of web video, not bad.
...controversy drives box office success, mass media interest and general
awareness.
Hi Rupert:
Just a few thoughts...
There is a difference between
What service do you prefer to livestream from events?
Ustream, CoverItLive, something else?
Why do you prefer it?
We've used Justin.tv for some events very successfully. For the tech
geeks--They allow you to use Quicktime Broadcaster and hook into their
servers which allows for better quality.
what will help web video is better web video.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Mark Villaseñor
videoblogyahoogr...@tailtrex.tv wrote:
Rupert Howe: And I can't agree with the `It's terrible for the industry!'
people. It will be *good* for the profile of web video, not bad.
...controversy
Yes. An awards show sucked. Who knew.
The meat of the matter is that it showed the Hollywoodyist of the Hollywoodys,
not the best web video. It was about commercial success and not creativity.
They showed people that web video is about selling to the highest bidder,
getting sponsors, brand
I've been successfully livestreaming presentations at a conference
this week using ustream - it has worked flawlessly.
David
On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
What service do you prefer to livestream from events?
Ustream, CoverItLive, something else?
Why
this event was the first live stream i ever got to see. our lovely country
setting does not come with the internet, and our lovely superheroine series
routinely gets deleted for content after being flagged by pornographers who
don't like our standards. i wanted to see who prevails.
i was
I'd say at $3k a month in sales you are in the top 1% of people making money
in web video. You're also not doing advertising, right?
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:28 AM, daredolls dared...@gmail.com wrote:
this event was the first live stream i ever got to see. our lovely country
setting does
A thought re bad for the industry
There is no industry.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hulu, Netflix, Youtube, Blip, Vimeo, a hundred other web video service
providers, and thousands of web video producers would disagree. I've been
making a living doing web video production and editing for the past two
years. It's still fledgling, but it's an industry.
And yeah, this was bad for
That depends if you include the web porn video industry. Im not going to get
into a long debate about whether daredolls material can be labelled porn, in
some ways no, or at least very soft, in other ways its clearly fetish stuff
that will get the same sort of reaction from people video hosts
At ISOC-NY we've been using livestream without problems - we switched
from ustream a couple of years back just because the landing page
seemed a little prettier.
Our webcaster Lou Klepner recently purchased a couple of remote cams
and the wirecast switching software - you can see him putting it
Despite my OP on the Streamys being rather negative, and my tendency to be
negative and unproductive in general, I still care rather a lot about this
industry. We are well beyond the era where I would get caught up in fears that
the industrial aspirations of some would harm the non-industry
Another open source video editing package (that adds some live video
features to boot) that looks interesting:
http://lives.sourceforge.net
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the link to the software page: http://trac.videolan.org/vlmc/
Michael Sullivan: what will help web video is better web video.
Hey Michael:
I wholeheartedly agree, especially with respect to content!
Yet while content is king I think it also behooves both Vlogger and Web
Video Producer alike, as well as those wearing both hats, to consider issues
that
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Brook Hinton bhin...@gmail.com wrote:
Another open source video editing package (that adds some live video
features to boot) that looks interesting:
http://lives.sourceforge.net
Gabriel, the LiVES developer, has reached out to some on this group.
So far it's
This is pretty awesome:
http://newteevee.com/2010/04/12/google-to-open-source-vp8-for-html5-video/
That could seriously change the codec equation for the better.
Yep, its here. An open source codec that supposedly can compete with
H264. I look forward to actually seeing what the codec looks
I'm so bored by the idea of even more epic codec battles. Apple/
Safari/iPhone/iPad in h264 versus Google/Chrome/Phones/Set Top Box/etc
in ogg/vp8. Versus Microsoft and whatever they choose to do. No
compatibility between browsers for HTML5.
Seems like Apple are hardening their position on
Online video is not TV. Online video is not TV. Online video is not...
But this is interesting:
http://philipbloom.co.uk/2010/04/10/house-season-finale-shot-entirely-with-canon-5dmkii/
The TV show, House, will shoot an episode entirely on the Canon 5D.
I found it interesting since several folks
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
I love Apple and use all they have...but I dont like
the idea that I depend on their benevolence. Jobs will die...and
instead of a hippie entrepreneur, we'll get the ex-President of Pepsi
leading the company again.
So
yep.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Quirk qu...@wreckandsalvage.com wrote:
Yes. An awards show sucked. Who knew.
The meat of the matter is that it showed the Hollywoodyist of the
Hollywoodys, not the best web video. It was about commercial success and not
creativity.
They showed people
chance's story showed that charging nominees for participation is a dubious
undertaking -- since without nominees there would be no industry and no
award show in the first place. second of all, making anyone feel left out
(since this is the web, which is pretty much an all-inclusive type of
Jay: here is a great source of regularly updated info on any of the Canon DSLRs
( and a few other makes as well.) Roger.
http://blog.planet5d.com/planet5D
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
From: jay.ded...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:23:06 -0400
Subject: [videoblogging] TV episode will
27 matches
Mail list logo
