Who was charging to encode in DivX?
Jim V
DivX, Inc.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I was looking for.
I decided on the hi-quality single bit h.264.
(Are they still charging content creators to encode using DivX?)
Any other opinions
IIRC, DivX was a $500 purchase if you wanted to encode video using DivX.
Of course that was around 2000-2002 or so, and it totally could have
been less money, but I remember wanting to use it, but not wanting to
pay so much to do so legally.
$19.99 is a much better price.
Ron Watson
On the
The $20 is the price for the software div pro, wheras I think the $500
dollars refers to the license to distribute div-encoded content that
divx sells to commercial users.
I seem to remember vaguely ranting about this stuff, and questioning
whether it would affect vloggers, ages ago. I thought I
We have had an open offer of not only free encoding license vor video,
but also covering mp3 encoding for quite a while now. I've been here
since 2002. Non commercial has always been free.
Anyway, hit me up if you have any DivX questions or want more info
about free licensing.
Jim V
DivX, Inc.
Just dreaming here but what would be cool is if the people you are
collaborating with could see what you are doing real time. Almost
like remoting in to your PC but completely secure and allowing
multiple people. That way as someone is editing you could have
someone else looking for the next
Wow that videostring thing was very similar to a daydream I had 2
wekks ago, great to see that someone already tried it. I am fascinated
with the idea of video as language, but as they seem very aware, its
not obvious exactly how to achieve this, and words are used in video
quite a lot, which
Cheers, thats another exciting service for sure! Has some stuff in
common with recent ponderings about non-video media (eg photos text
blog) being blended with video into something that you watch. Their
implementation so far seems like a clever idea but Im already put off
by lots of silly little
Nice dream :) It could be achieved to a certain extent using the sorts
of remoting stuff you are referring to, think something like VNC has a
'view-only' mode? But in practice it wouldnt be ideal for most people
to do it that way?
What I hope is that online tools make this sort of stuff not only
