[videoblogging] Re: NOOOOOOO!!!!

2007-04-14 Thread Steve Watkins
Its good to be concerned about this stuff, thanks for posting about it. Luckily I dont think its quite as bad as it sounds. Ive read the following very boring document to get some detail on what they might be looking at exactly: http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Hearings/2007/n2007-5.htm You are

[videoblogging] Re: NOOOOOOO!!!!

2007-04-14 Thread Casey McKinnon
I created a Facebook group called Canadians for New Media Freedom here: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2319008732 In all honesty, I don't care about trying to highlight Canadian voices... I believe you'll find your audience if people like you, so why force Canadian content on Canadians?

[videoblogging] Re: NOOOOOOO!!!!

2007-04-14 Thread Steve Watkins
Oh I do agree that it could be a foot in the door. Its just really unclear how far that sort of censorship will go on the internet in the future, by any country. Do you know specifically what current regulation would prevent sexually suggestive or ass-rape jokes from being done by you if they

Re: [videoblogging] Re: NOOOOOOO!!!!

2007-04-14 Thread Rupert
That's absolutely my concern, too. And even if your content isn't censored as such, I'd be worried that you'd be subject to bureaucratic bullshit - having to get your content Rated, forcing users to confirm they're over a certain age, confirming the %age of your production team and

[videoblogging] Re: NOOOOOOO!!!!

2007-04-14 Thread Steve Watkins
From my limited knowledge as an outsider, Candas style of legislation looks to me like a cross between the wider EU way of doing things, some stuff that seems quite a bit stronger, similar to France and their sense of strong promotion of one national culture by government. with the close

[videoblogging] Re: NOOOOOOO!!!!

2007-04-14 Thread Steve Watkins
Oops sorry I didnt mean to typo Canada. Found an article from some years back when there was some focus on much the same issue: http://www.articledashboard.com/Article/The-CRTC---the-Internet--Forbidden-Domain/176409 Im not sure Id agree with its use of that strange child pron case judgement as